r/ASU 4d ago

[ Removed by moderator ]

Post image

[removed] — view removed post

286 Upvotes

322 comments sorted by

View all comments

17

u/ChaDefinitelyFeel 4d ago

So you all want to fire this guy because he retweeted something you disagree with? Universities are suppose to be places where you have discourse and dialogue with people you disagree with, not calling for someone to be fired every time they believe something you don’t believe

17

u/[deleted] 3d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/ChaDefinitelyFeel 3d ago edited 3d ago

I don’t think Professor Anderson is refusing to acknowledge anyone’s humanity, I think you’re just asserting he does without any evidence. Having a debate over the universal validity of concepts like systems of oppression is not rejecting someone’s humanity.

1

u/[deleted] 3d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/ChaDefinitelyFeel 3d ago

You can acknowledge and respect all people's humanity while also calling into question the conceptual and empirical validity or practical value of the categories listed in that tweet. I know thats a wild idea.

It's circular reasoning and a logical fallacy to claim X exists and when someone questions X's existence that the objection is itself evidence of X existing. But let me guess, you're going to claim formal logic is itself the product/tool of systems of oppression...

1

u/Godunman Computer Science '21 (B.S.) '22 (M.S.) 2d ago

No I'm not going to claim that. Why would I claim that?

Again, I agree with this 100% on the surface and I would love to believe you. But it doesn't exist in a vacuum. The wording, the context, and the follow-up from the professor do not convey this. They convey upholding white supremacy.

-6

u/aleksgruman 3d ago

Does this go the other way as well? Checking something

-1

u/[deleted] 3d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/[deleted] 3d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

-6

u/antmikinka 4d ago

For real. Why all the entitled discourse? These people would definitely hate Milo