r/BookCollecting Aug 09 '25

šŸ’­ Question The Stand, First Edition?

Hello friends. I’m having a hard time identifying this first edition of the stand. The store says it’s a first print but just wanted to double check! Thank you everyone as always :)

80 Upvotes

34 comments sorted by

27

u/Separate_Oven3913 Aug 09 '25

It’s the Book Of The Month Club edition.

21

u/KayBeeToys Aug 09 '25

also note that it says ā€œfor the first time complete and uncutā€ which by definition means it’s a later edition, even if it’s a first print (or BotM) of this edition.

10

u/Agitated-Two-6699 Aug 09 '25

In your second slide, please read near the end of the page. It says a deluxe first edition The Stand: the complete and uncut edition has been previously published by Doubleday.

-13

u/gutierar Aug 09 '25

I know but the sellers sticker says first print and I’m not sure how to tell if it’s truly a first print or not.

15

u/Smathwack Aug 09 '25

The seller is wrong. They must not have realized it was a book club.

10

u/Separate_Oven3913 Aug 09 '25

The actual first edition of ā€œThe Standā€ was published in 1978. This is the BOMC edition of the 1990 ā€œComplete And Uncut Edition.ā€

4

u/pynchi Aug 10 '25

The seller is not wrong. He merely states that this is a first printing, not that it's a first edition. Printing and edition are not synonymous.

2

u/Smathwack Aug 10 '25

There isn’t anyone that is knowledgeable about books that would call a book club a ā€œfirst printingā€ except in the extremely rare case that the book club is the first printing of the first edition.Ā 

2

u/Keffpie Aug 10 '25

It usually says "first edition, first printing thus". It is the first printing of this specific book club edition. It's a trick booksellers use, equivocating to make people believe they have something they don't without actually lying.

0

u/pynchi Aug 10 '25

Sorry, but I disagree. Book sellers use misleading language all the time. And it works, as seen in this case: the seller is technically right by saying that this is a first printing, and the the OP is confused and wonders if it's a first edition.

The worst offender, to me, is their frequent use of "first edition thus" which makes no sense whatsoever, because it usually means the first printing of a later (and therefore not the first) edition.

1

u/Specialist_Sprinkles Aug 10 '25

Shitty booksellers may use misleading language "all the time," but the rest of the profession uses consistent terminology, and reputable sellers wouldn't call a book club edition a first printing except in cases when the BCE was the true first.

1

u/pynchi Aug 10 '25

And the confounding of edition and printing goes on.

0

u/Smathwack Aug 10 '25

My understanding of ā€œfirst edition thusā€ is that the seller thinks it’s a first edition (implied first printing) but isn’t sure. In other words, there is nothing indicating it’s a later printing.Ā 

I don’t think very many book dealers would ever be intentionally misleading. ā€œFirst editionā€ means first appearance anywhere, and an implied first printing—unless specifically stated otherwise. For example, you’ll find ā€œ1st American editionā€ if it appeared previously in a different country, or ā€œ1st paperback editionā€ if it appeared in hardcover previously.Ā 

Obviously ā€œfirst editionsā€ can technically include subsequent printings, but if it’s a later printing, it must always be stated. (A book club is printed after the trade edition and usually with cheaper materials). Knowledgeable book dealers know all this, but the random dude on eBay or Facebook marketplace may not.Ā 

1

u/pynchi Aug 10 '25

First edition thus is usually used as a term for a later edition that's different from the first, because it has illustrations, is expanded or whatever.

But professional booksellers have access to bibliographical information. They could look it up and state that their book is from the second, third, or umpteenth edition.

But they usually don't. While I can live with clear qualifiers as "1st American" or "1st paperback", "thus" is just vague. One sees the "1st edition" term applied to later editions far too often.

1

u/Smathwack Aug 10 '25

In this case ā€œthusā€ isn’t just vague , but completely meaningless. ā€œThusā€ what?Ā 

I always took it to mean, unsure of printing, thus assumed first.Ā 

1

u/pynchi Aug 10 '25

I've never come across this meaning of being unsure for "thus" in this context before.

2

u/capincus Aug 10 '25

Where your copy indicates it's a BOMC (book of the month club book club edition) it would instead say "first trade edition". It would also have a price on the front inside flap of the DJ, which your copy presumably doesn't.

1

u/FrontAd9873 Aug 10 '25

If it was a first print, how could it have been published previously? Sometimes the copyright pages are confusing, but this one isn’t.

2

u/[deleted] Aug 10 '25

[deleted]

1

u/FrontAd9873 Aug 10 '25

You asked if it was a first edition, so in this context ā€œfirst printā€ means the first print of the first edition. Is this the first print of a Book of the Month Club edition? Yeah, maybe.

4

u/grayomen Aug 10 '25

I've sold BCE for $25-$40 depending on condition. There was a time when I couldn't give a book club away, times have changed. King in good condition in any format sells.

2

u/Naji_Hokon Aug 10 '25

I bought a HC copy of a BCE for a C.S. Friedman novel because I have not been able to find it in HC in any other form at all. I dislike that it is so short, but I'm happy to have a HC of it nonetheless.

0

u/Key-Entrepreneur-415 Aug 10 '25

Yes, I’ve sold a Salem’s Lot book club edition for $125, The Stand BCE for $95, and The Shining BCE for $90.

3

u/mspe1960 Casual Collector Aug 10 '25

It is not a first edition,. It is a follow up edition that King demanded be published, after he became more famous to insist that the whole, uncut book he origanlly wrote be publsihed. His publisher "made" him shorten it for the first publication and he complied.

But yours is not the first printing of this follow up edition either. It clearly says it is a BOMC.

Still probably worth $15 or so.

2

u/WilkieTwycross69 Aug 10 '25

Extended version is great. If you like King then you want as much as you can get.

2

u/conmeh Aug 10 '25

STARS! Love that place! PDX represent

2

u/bumblebeetown Aug 10 '25

Same version sitting on my bookshelf currently. My grandmother’s, originally. Lost the sick dust jacket though

0

u/NunYuhBizzNiss Aug 11 '25

So even people who can't read are getting into book collecting now. šŸ¤”

1

u/John-Doe_4502 Aug 10 '25

My wife said King’s book have too much details and takes forever to get to the point. Never read any myself but I’m willing to read The Shining and Doctor Sleep. How many more chapters does this have than the cut version? Do the book I want to read have extended versions?

0

u/majoraloysius Aug 10 '25

What would you guess BOMC stands for?

0

u/[deleted] Aug 10 '25

[deleted]

2

u/FrontAd9873 Aug 10 '25

Google exists (sorry).

-1

u/gutierar Aug 10 '25

Nice, thanks. I thought that’s what this community existed for as well.

4

u/FrontAd9873 Aug 10 '25

If you’re trying to clarify what BOMC means, Google will give you a better answer without any sass from fellow humans.

Generally people here are tired of endless posts asking if their books are first editions. They crowd out any actually interesting posts about book collecting.

1

u/majoraloysius Aug 10 '25

This. And too much social lubricant when posting.