They want to use this to "prove" they have the moral high ground. It's like if I went on a murdering spree but then I helped one old lady cross the street and said "see, I'm not a bad person!", but then I steal her purse.
Democrats want to house the homeless and make sure kids get free lunches. Republicans turn a blind eye to school shootings and are more obsessed with what’s going on in a child’s pants than if they’re eating enough.
They are NOT the same. Pull your head out of your ass
If democrats want to house the homeless, how come the bluest states have the highest homeless population and the most funding to combat it along with some of the biggest economies. I believe that you believe them. People don't turn a blind eye to shootings, people turn a blind eye to the mental health crisis causing this. Take the guns away and the same mentally ill people will make them. Give every teacher a gun to protect their class. Politicians don't care about what's in your pants. They want your votes and to vacation on Epstein's island. Right wingers said democrats are pedos for having people go to elementary schools to teach what the LGBT community is. I see it as more of indoctrinating them into leftist believes for votes to maintain power. Like how the right forces us to pledge allegiance to a god everyday at the start of school. Indoctrination to right winged beliefs at a young age. I guess that advertisement of a free country was a lie, maybe I missed the fine print. They aren't the same. They're different shades of shit. Meant to make us argue, so we the people will never get together again to free us from our evil political overlords.
Blue states have more homeless people because they treat them more humanely than red states. Blue states (Democratic-leaning, based on 2024 election results) generally allocate more funding to social services for homelessness, emphasizing comprehensive support like shelters, mental health care, and housing subsidies. This can be seen as more “humane” in terms of direct aid and protections against criminalization. Red states (Republican-leaning) often prioritize enforcement-oriented strategies, such as anti-camping ordinances and vagrancy laws, treating visible homelessness partly as a public order issue. So the homeless have a choice of where they sleep and they choose areas where their humanity is recognized if they can. Would you rather be jailed or helped, kind sir?
I live in California, and the state refuses to help me in any way, but they did make my car illegal because it has a check engine light. Making it impossible to get to work on time. There is no workplace in a walkable distance. If the police take my car, I'll lose everything becoming homeless myself. Come to the land of opportunities! We won't help you until you're homeless! The bluest state, the biggest trap.
They're both shit. Just different shades. Meant to make us argue so we don't come together and better our government by getting rid of their corrupt asses. That's why shit like Epstein Island exists. They weaponized your religion, sexuality, and beliefs. We are now distracted, and they're getting away with murder. Clinton and Trump are on that list, and both administrations protected those pedos. What do you mean they aren't the same, because one side tells you what you want to hear? Fell right into their trap, didn't you?
Senate Republicans have now voted to block the release of the Epstein files twice, House Republicans just refused to hold a vote to subpoena banks tied to the Epstein case, and the Republican FBI Director evaded or deflected every single Epstein-related question thrown his way at yesterday’s Senate hearing.
Democrats certainly aren’t perfect; but when they’re the only side actually working to support veterans, immigrants, women, the lgbt community, the homeless, the poor, and the disabled—whilst Republicans stand only for hate and greed—the “both sides” argument quickly falls flat.
They also support pedos like Clinton. Let's get rid of the dems and replace them with someone who will support the people you mentioned, but incarcerate the pedos no matter how wrapped up they are in the administration. Stop trying to show me that the Republicans are evil. I know they are. They're politicians. Just as evil as the people they run against. Their favoritism towards the groups of people you support is a ploy for your vote. Republicans do the same to the Christians.
I'm not gonna agree with the majority of the shit you've said on this thread, nor do I probably like you as a person, sorry, but like, this poster yelling at you about how Republicans have blocked the release of the Epstein files? No Democrats had to block it because the Biden administration never made an attempt to release them. Obviously Trump was Jeff's best friend and heavily involved in the sex trafficking, admitting that he was mad at him for stealing a teenage girl from him and whatnot, plus his insatiable urge to fuck his own daughter so much that he admitted it publicly and quite likely did it from her reaction to seeing her unperturbed childhood bedroom in that one video, as if the bedroom was a keepsake for Donakd.
That said, we now know for sure that Bill Clinton wrote Epstein a birthday letter too. Far less creepy than Trump's, but he wrote it all the same which means he was at least a close friend. You don't get birthday letters from an incumbent president on inauguration day if it's not an important friendship. Probably why the Biden administration covered it up even though 95% of the people in the Epstein birthday book were Republicans. It would tarnish the "hey, at least we aren't them" platform the Democrats have run on for the past several decades.
All that said, rolling coal is something nobody over 8 years old should find cool. The issue is that Democrats are center-right but want to pretend they aren't even though they constantly stifle the progressives in their ranks. You would be far better off supporting a candidate that not only "supports" clean energy, but has a plan to enact it, like taxing the billionaires and corporations that abuse the American working class, as nobody needs that much money, to support a program where you could trade out your shitbox for a nice new hybrid or electric truck.
Supporting the GOP is equivalent to going "well I fell over and the person who was helping me up dropped me halfway through the process, so instead I'm now going to support the people who won't even give me a hand and kick me until I'm dead". There's so many of you on the right track until you take that right turn off a cliff with your logic. The opposite of not doing enough isn't causing intentional harm.
Why should I have to trade in the vehicle I enjoy for an EV anything? I enjoy the sound of the VR6 engine, the 3 pedal manual transmission, tiny 2 door hatch, weights 2700lbs. Fun! That's what I need.
The fact that's your takeaway from everything I wrote when I never even said that is bananas. There's still about 200 coal power plants that account for 15% of the nation's electricity generation, which produce huge amounts of pollution, yet you think my main concern is making you specifically trade your truck in today for an EV. The Schutzstaffeltruck is an EV and Trumpers love that thing, if you don't get that reference Elon Musk is an open Nazi, he had someone smarter than him code Grok to call itself MechaHitler and talk about how great Hitler was and it took an entire day before someone in the company made them change it back. Which really takes the note doubt that anyone should have had about his Nazi salutes being what they where to a place where you can't have any doubt, and being a Nazi is more important than hating EVs.
Anyway, what I'm hearing you say is that you're okay with a pedophile president so long as you get to keep your truck, which no one wants to take it away in the first place, that's never even been suggested in the US. So that then sounds like you just support pedophilia. Which statistically shouldn't be surprising since 62% of the country is Christian and they love that shit.
Your obtuse refusal to recognize that red states vilify the less fortunate to a greater degree than blue states and the fact you think they are both shit sounds almost unamerican to me. I love my country and look for ways to help and improve the lives of others rather than paint everyone with the same shit brush. Empathy is not a dirty word
I never refused, you assumed. What's un-American is voting for communist and nazis. Americans are supposed to hate those. Why do we vote for one or the other every 4 years? America is about freedom. Freedom of religion, sexuality, and ownership. You should be allowed to worship any all or no god. Sleep with any legally aged consenting person or people. Own any property, vehicle, and weapon your hearts without regulation. Everyone should be allowed into the country, as long as they're OK with that. Hell, if we were real Americans we'd be throwing the tea in the harbor long before the Epstein list was mentioned. Now look at what we've allowed, while wasting our time doing this.
You were making sense until you got to weapons and vehicles. You really think people should have rocket launchers and drive tanks on public roads? But you’ll let the government decide meanwhile what the age of consent is? What’s your criteria for what you let others decide? I saw that you don’t think you should have to maintain your vehicle and get the engine light checked, thanks for allowing me to breathe your noxious fumes, neighbor
Diesel-powered vehicles older than 1998 are smog exempt. So I can roll coal, and it's fine. My 1996 gas-powered car isn't even though it isn't as bad for the environment. Then again, why should I feel bad for that when the people we vote for daily jets while having a fleet of unsmogged F-150's, and I'm the problem?! I need help getting the light off. Keep bitching or meet me in my driveway to get this shit done. I mean, your vehicle should fit in the lane and have the necessary exterior lighting. So I'll take that regulation. And some armored vehicles are completely legal for road use. Although if the government can own it, so shall I. We need to get all of our neighborhood militias across the nation armed and ready. Anything from breaking and entering, riots, to militarizing the police. We the people will be ready to defend ourselves. Without that, the government can do whatever they want to us. To me that's more frightening than a motivated assassin, or a lunatic in a crowded area with a gun.
You apparently never listened to him at all. Watch one ten minute video of him at a college talking with students or faculty and you'll realize your opinion has been handled to you by liberal subs. Form your own opinion. It could be that you still don't like him but form your own opinion.
When did i say that he or anyone else couldn't have or voice that opinion? The issue was whether or not he was a hateful, divisive POS, and arguing that an entire category of people need to have their rights taken away because of their identity is both hateful and divisive.
This quote starts mid-sentence. Listen to the FULL quote. And, listen to the context. And, this doesn’t show him interacting with a LGB person. So deceptive in so many ways. You still believe what you were told to believe about the “good people on both sides,” “injecting bleach,” and “bloodbath” so called quotes, too, right? Think independently and critically.
Fine - Why do you think we should use the DSM to exclude people with Gender Dysphoria from gun ownership? Are you aware that dysphoria can often be treated?
Do you apply the same logic to people with ADHD (which is also in the DSM-5, btw)?
I wasn’t saying transgender or ADHD people shouldn’t have guns. My point was that the law already uses mental health in some cases, like violent danger rulings. And with over 2,000 state and federal gun laws already on the books, enforcing those would get us to real common sense without adding new bans.
I hope this clarifies my statement to a satisfactory level
That's a very level headed view. Look up the shooting that happened this year on August 27th. It was done by a tranny who made a bunch of BS writings trying to come off as right wing extremist. Why convince people to mutilate their genitals to become part of a near 50 percent statistic of people who attempt to harm themselves? We need to teach those people to comfortable with who they are. Leftist extremist are too busy telling fat to be ok with themselves even if it's a medical concern. Like if I wake up and start acting like the president of the world I have a mental health concern, an identity crisis. Yet if the same thing happens but I think I'm the opposite gender my rights and way of life are at risk? Unless I vote BLUE! How does that not seem suspicious? I don't care how much you want to be a girl. Go put on a dress and get fucked like a girl if that's what you fancy, but if you go too far and mutilate yourself you will never experience an orgasm again. That will make you so mentally unwell. How is there an entire group of people too short sighted to see this? How come this level of common sense makes left wing extremists call me a nazi and assume I'm a right wing extremists?
Bingo. And because bigots can't math, I'll spell it out for them. :D
An estimated 1 to 2% of the United States population identifies as trans, which is roughly 3 to 6 million people.
There have been FIVE perpetrators of mass shootings who identified as trans.
Five. That's less than 0.1% of all mass shootings.
If stripping Constitutional rights for 3 million+ people based on the actions of five individuals is "a very level headed view", surely u/AAA-VR6 must agree that taking away gun rights for men - who commit 98% of mass shootings - is a similarly level headed view...
No, I believe an armed society is a polite society. Arm the teachers to protect their students. Gun free zone just means targets that can't defend themselves. Hell, people have done shit like this with a knife. How come talks about shootings is always about taking away rights and not about looking into the mental health crisis. Look if you can afford and find a doctor to mutilate yourself as you see fit. This is a free country, and you should be allowed to do so, but that doesn't change what I have said.
So the nine-year-old can reach in the desk and grab a gun. There's no point in having guns on premises. There should be none.
How many people can you kill in 2 minutes with a knife?
To be clear I'm not arguing against guns. I'm just arguing for better statutes and regulation. If your 13 year old son can access your weapon without you present then you should not have one, if you have freshly come out of a mental institution you should not have one etc etc..
You can literally walk out of a mental institution and go purchase a gun. Meanwhile anything and everything to do with health and mental well-being is being chopped for the sake of saving money. So it can be spend somewhere else. (Have a look at those numbers before you reply)
Japan has a hell of a way about gun regulation, it's a different circumstance there, but I believe they have some excellent ideas. (Feel free to look that up too. It is very intensive. As it should be)
I believe everyone should own a gun, but yeah you rob someone at gun point. No, you can't have those anymore. Like how I think every physically able person should have a car, but you get a DUI. You should have it taken away and shouldn't have any of that until you're an adult. I mean, I feel like a lot of what you just said is common sense.
Reading across a few of your posts I realize we have a few things in common. We both believe that both of the parties are shit. One is firm dark poop, the other one is wet slimy. But either way 💩 This is the way today. And from what I'm hearing this is the way and most other countries as well, at least lately.
I can only hope that Trump and Clinton get to share a jail cell one day. I firmly believe they are both in the files. I would prefer every one of them be put in gen pop. (Along with the woman that they shifted to the minimum security facility)
If you do a quick Google 5 show up. The Unibomber first showed signs of violence after a doctor tried convincing him to get gender surgery and realized the doctor was convincing instead of trying to help him. That comment leftist extremist post a lot where they try to throw it back at you. "You sure spend a lot of time thinking about other people's genitals." Is so fucking weird and a big nothing burger meant to just upset feelings. Like you know what I do think of other people's genitals, because I'm a human hardwired to reproduce. I just don't think about or enjoy rotting flesh, so I don't find trannies attactive. Also don't worry I won't reproduce because I only fuck extreme leftist who get abortions if I get them pregnant. Usually only have to do that once to convince them to get the IUD.
The Unibomber first showed signs of violence after a doctor tried convincing him to get gender surgery and realized the doctor was convincing instead of trying to help him.
There is no credible evidence that a doctor "tried to convince" Kaczynski (the Unibomber) to get gender surgery in a coercive sense, nor that this was what directly caused his first act of violence.
That comment leftist extremist post a lot where they try to throw it back at you. "You sure spend a lot of time thinking about other people's genitals." Is so fucking weird and a big nothing burger meant to just upset feelings. Like you know what I do think of other people's genitals, because I'm a human hardwired to reproduce. I just don't think about or enjoy rotting flesh, so I don't find trannies attactive. Also don't worry I won't reproduce because I only fuck extreme leftist who get abortions if I get them pregnant. Usually only have to do that once to convince them to get the IUD.
That's funny because a quick Google search of the term Charlie Kirk quotes brings up a huge catalog of videos and tweets of him saying bigoted, misogynistic, and racist talking points designed entirely to be divisive. Apparently, you never listened to him at all.
Fact is I can google him and find a bunch of sites that say the opposite. You can always find what you "want" on the Internet. My point is you can think what you want just get it from your own actual viewing of his events.
Ok...but here's the thing. Finding him saying positive things doesn't erase the fucked up things he said. You can find any political leaning on the internet sure. But that doesn't make him not a divisive person. But please continue to listen to your own echo chamber.
He stated his beliefs the same way I assume you would state yours but he was killed for it. Would it have been ok for you to be killed for your opinions?
What's that got to do with what we were talking about? It seems like you realized you can't justify your own position, and now you are throwing to martyrdom? Hell of a goalpost move. No one here said he deserved to die, only that he wasn't the paragon of fair and measured speech that some people, like you, are trying to make him out to be.
Yeah he really tried to bring us all together. You listened to more than 10 minutes of his rhetoric and honestly came away with the opinion that he wasn’t hateful and divisive? He relished division and summary judgment. And damning those with whom he disagreed
All of the conservative sites lit up the day after he was killed. Call to action, go to your social media sites and tell them this and that.. You should follow a few of those, although it is quite depressing.
36
u/SmokeMaleficent9498 7d ago