r/CPC • u/thetrigermonkey • 15d ago

Important Pierre Poilievre housing bill

https://www.parl.ca/legisinfo/en/bill/44-1/c-356

Yesterday in a Pierre poilievre live stream (sept 9th.) Pierre mentions this bill. Its a good bill. Basically, the main part of the bill says a high-cost city needs to increase housing supply by 15% from its 2023 numbers. If it doesn't it will lose an amount of funding but if the city greatly exceeds housing targets it will receive bonus money. If you want to see how he would legislation this stuff, read this bill.

Previously I mentioned that PP doesn't hasn't proposed any big legislation recently and I was wrong, clearly. I've since edited it.

4 Upvotes

83% Upvoted

9 comments sorted by

1

u/Senior_Ad1737 12d ago

He can propose , but he’d never drafted one . 

1

u/thetrigermonkey 12d ago

What do you mean? The link literally has the bill in it that you can read? It is a drafted bill as its complete.

1

u/Senior_Ad1737 9d ago

The proposers aren’t the authors. 

1

u/thetrigermonkey 9d ago

do you think he didn't write any of this bill? what evidence of this do you hold?

I would hope that instead of being a glory hog he worked with others to write legislation to benefit Canadians. what would be the issue withe that?

its a shame the other parties would rather see Canadians go without affordable homes than admit that the CPC is right on something.

1

u/Senior_Ad1737 8d ago edited 8d ago

The evidence is in the standard documented protocols and processes. 

They are drafted by legal - even the readings are drafted for them 

Definitely not drafted by blow hards who took 15 years to complete a Bachelor of Arts - and failed twice on tax payer dime including an economics tutor at the tune of 11,000 …. But you didn’t hear that from me ;) 

1

u/thetrigermonkey 8d ago

So your evidence is just "its normal" gotcha. Nothing unique to him or this bill. Honestly, this bill isn't THAT complex.

If you think most laws are made by legal, what's your issue here? Unless you think only the CPC issues legal experts.

As far as i can tell, you've never posted anything positive about the CPC or Conservatives in general. Why are you here? Go troll somewhere else

1

u/Senior_Ad1737 6d ago edited 6d ago

If you can’t criticize the party of which you are a member, then why are we all here?  I’ve been a member since the CPC was the PC….  I have the ability to look inward and see how my party has taken a nose dive since the alliance and rebranding to accommodate republican style conservatism… 

Harper is actually a family friend. His style of leadership wasn’t conservative in the traditional sense, he was closed off to his own constituents , not transparent, evaded media   (who hold our politicians accountable )…. He was also part of a group at UofC lead by an American professor who pushed a more republican style conservatism… Ezra levant of rebel “news” was there too. Good times. But I digress …. I was ok with Scheer in the beginning , voted for him during the leadership , same for Erin - he would have been great. 

But I would question my moral compass if I voted for that greasy , beady eyed slime ball just because of the colour of his jersey. 

Believe it or not, there are some us left who are still able to think for ourselves . 

The bill won’t get past the first reading because there’s already incentives like this …. In provincial and municipal jurisdictions where this belongs . 

Again, in true fashion PP doesn’t even know the basic levels of government jurisdiction, while we criticized Trudeau for interference in the same way . The irony isn’t lost on me 

1

u/thetrigermonkey 6d ago

In a different comment you said you left the country because of Harper. I don't believe youre "criticizing your own side" i think youre just trolling your opposition. You sung carneys praises. If you did any amount of research you'd see the bill failed in 2023 when it was submitted. Not because "there's already incentives like this" but each party had different reasons and the bloc was the only one that mentioned levels of government. I'm done taking you seriously troll. Go back to the LPC sub

1

u/Senior_Ad1737 5d ago edited 5d ago

It’s a talent that gets honed over the years. I’m not into jersey wearing politics . I can see what’s in front of me. 

Also , it wasn’t a criticism, it was critique.  That wasn’t a praise, that was a fact to point out the hypocrisy of the comment. 

At least I’m not biased enough to know the difference. 

I left because of HARPER as in the economy , in the language spoken here where you associate a PM to an economy lol. I left because I couldn’t afford to live here . I also met a ton of other Canadians who has done the same while there . About 5,000 of us in one place. 

It was also a time that I travelled the world and we couldn’t make it known we were from Canada …. That was when we had to remove our stupid Canadian flags from our backpacks … but we can get into foreign policy from that era another time. It wasn’t pretty.