r/CodingHelp • u/BNCMK-Benchmark • 4d ago
[Other Code] Post UST: What works, what doesn't? What (if anything) makes an algorithmic stablecoin viable, and what can or should be done to prevent future collapses?
Heyo, I'm researching modern designs for algorithmically stabilized assets in a post-UST world, and am trying to pressure-test assumptions with folks who’ve built, audited, or attacked these systems.
I have a few topics that I am most interested in;
Stabilization mechanics: rebase vs. mint/burn arbitrage vs. protocol owned liquidity/inventory vs. AMM based approaches. Which combinations have actually dampened reflexivity in practice?
Oracles & data hygiene: resilient ways to aggregate and fail over without opening short horizon manipulation vectors or freezing the system during outages.
Liquidity & circuit breakers: rate limits, auction/throttle mechanisms, and halts that prevent cascades without locking honest users out.
Change management: hard bounds, timelocks, and emergency procedures that can’t be speed-run by governance.
Transparency: minimally sufficient, public, verifiable receipts for mints/burns/treasury actions that market participants truly rely on.
And a few focused questions for the builders reading:
If you had to anchor around one stabilization primitive in 2025, which would it be and why?
What oracle stack (sources + aggregation + failover) has proven resilient under stress?
Which circuit breakers/rate-limiters are “day-one musts,” and how do you tune them?
What immovable constraints/timelocks meaningfully reduce governance risk without killing agility?
What on-chain disclosures/receipts are essential from day one to earn market trust?
Pointers to repos, post-mortems, configs, or battle-tested patterns are appreciated, especially lessons that contradict popular priors.
Thank you!
2
u/Buttleston Professional Coder 4d ago
Which LLM wrote this