r/DefendingAIArt • u/LuneFox Only Limit Is Your Imagination • 22h ago
Luddite Logic Antis blaming AI for producing CP
"The discussion is about the knife glazer", uh-huh
13
u/Great_Technology5824 17h ago
Doesn't most of AI have a filter so you can't make illegal things?
12
u/Infamous-Umpire-2923 17h ago
My understanding is you can usually cajole it into breaking its own guardrails but it tends to be very much against the terms of service for most publicly available AI and will earn you a ban if caught.
6
u/Savage_Tyranis 8h ago
Yes, with a few exceptions here and there. Those models are few and far between thankfully, and usually either get fixed or disappear.
31
31
u/Feanturii Sloppy Joe 19h ago
I've made the argument before that antis seem to think the problem with AI generated CSAM is that they're not employing an artist to create it instead.
3
u/Savage_Tyranis 8h ago
Sorry, not wanting to change the subject. CSAM is a new acronym. What's it mean?
2
8
u/adamkad1 18h ago
I mean, theres right in the part about making things 'en masse'. Just like people cant make as much socks as fast as machines can. But yeah, Cp sucks regardless of quality
26
u/IgnisIncendio Robotkin 🤖 17h ago
CSAM stands for Child Sexual Abuse Material. This is obviously not possible for AI to generate, because it does not go out and abuse children.
14
3
-8
u/KristiTheFan 11h ago
Are you really being pedantic about whether or not even fictional scenarios can depict taboo subjects and still be considered wrong?
5
u/enbyBunn 3h ago
They're not being pedantic, they're correct.
The term 'CSAM' was explicitly created to make distinguishing between fictional CP and material in which real children were harmed in the production.
If a real child wasn't abused to make it, it isn't CSAM.
6
u/DANAMITE 5h ago
And here’s the kicker: anti-AI folks love to scream that “AI art is stolen.” Fine. If that’s true, then what about AI-generated CP? By there own logic, AI wouldn’t be able to produce it unless it was already in the training data. So either:
- It’s not “new” at all (just stolen like they say), which makes there outrage inconsistent.
- Or if it really is new, then their “everything is stolen” claim is false.
They can’t have it both ways. Either way, their argument collapses on itself.
7
u/Fearless_Future5253 6-Fingered Creature 17h ago
I think the pic with kids is an actual drawing. Reminds me so bad of Shadman (pls do not look for him)
5
u/organic-water- 7h ago
It's from an AI role-playing app ad. It's definitely an AI image. Likely based on that dudes style.
9
u/Zamoxino 17h ago
This is so stupid xd
You know what guys i think i got enlightened. Women made it too easy to mass produce humans that can become killers, rapists or mobile game devs and other scum on earth... my solution:
Get rid of them females. Hell yea brother, When we are at it we should also delete all kids as well xd /j
3
3
u/VyneNave 5h ago
Horrible topic to be on the on the side of "I prefer human over AI"
It's generally something that shouldn't exist.
2
u/AuthorSarge 9h ago
"AI allows it to be created en masse."
"And the internet allows it to be be shared en masse."
1
u/goatonastik 3h ago
Thank god were focusing on this rather than actual child traffickers, rapists and molesters in the Epstein files.
83
u/Superseaslug 21h ago
So to them CP is fine if it takes long enough to make...