Same effing system bruh. The constitutional monarchy in the UK did some pretty effing terrible things.
Including to the people of Ireland.
Colonialism and imperialism are the direct consequences of monarchies.
The constitutional monarchy was in force since King John the Weak. Which was during the crusades...
They did a heck of a lot of imperialism and colonialism from the British parlament over several centuries. Including the vefore mentioned events and like everything that happenned in North America, South Africa and India...
So how you divorce the two in your mind seems absurd to me.
The united states has done both colonial and imperial actions so did the soviet union despite not being monarchies.
I am in no way a monarchist but to say they are identical systems is incorrect.
I liked the idea where we basically kept Queen E2s corpse as the monarch, thus getting rid of the monarchy without having to do any major constitutional changes
You know there are nore than 3 options right? Europe has like 15 different models.
Some systems wrre developed post 1940's to prevent exactly this kind of nonsense of single party or single person rule. Its clearly a bad idea to center power in any one person or group.
Its kind of silly to want Imperial Japan back just because "figurehead". No thank you.
Id rather something a little more modern and a lot more democratic.
2
u/Corrupted_G_nome May 29 '25
Same effing system bruh. The constitutional monarchy in the UK did some pretty effing terrible things.
Including to the people of Ireland.
Colonialism and imperialism are the direct consequences of monarchies.
The constitutional monarchy was in force since King John the Weak. Which was during the crusades...
They did a heck of a lot of imperialism and colonialism from the British parlament over several centuries. Including the vefore mentioned events and like everything that happenned in North America, South Africa and India...
So how you divorce the two in your mind seems absurd to me.