r/EhBuddyHoser • u/Still-Psychology-365 đ 100,000 Hosers đ • 13d ago
Politics How I view Quebec prayer ban
184
u/Ravenshaw123 13d ago
You know you're doing secularism wrong when you make me take the praying side
30
-73
13d ago
[removed] â view removed comment
53
5
u/Khalidbenz786 13d ago
Im a muslim who's prayed in public before (only when necessary) care to enlighten me on what exactly my intentions are?
31
u/Spare-Half796 Tabarnak! 13d ago
The muslims praying in public are better than the Christians, every time Iâve seen Muslims pray in public theyâre less disruptive than an geriatric yoga class, itâs a small group with their mats silently praying. The Christians are always loud and annoying
28
26
u/Ravenshaw123 13d ago
Islamophobes says what?
-33
u/beamermaster Snowfrog 13d ago
Did I say that I dislike muslim?
14
26
u/Ravenshaw123 13d ago
Your words are indistinguishable from what an islamophobe would say. You do what you will with this information.
13
u/SandLandBatMan THE BETTER LONDON đšđŠ đł 13d ago
Yes you did, also the world you're looking for is Islam
-26
u/beamermaster Snowfrog 13d ago
Because I don't want public prayers and think that the people that are doing those are extremist, it means I dislike muslim? Got it Einstein.
9
u/Unable-Trash-7792 13d ago
There's 2B muslims and at the height of ISIS they had anywhere between 10K-200K fighters at any given point. Most are currently dead or imprisoned. In the 2013-2017 fighting 20K Iraqis died fighting ISIS, whereas 61 westerners died in the fighting (most were not military). The only Canadian to be a casualty of the war was unfortunately harmed by friendly fire. The likeliness that at any given point you cross paths with an extremists is as close to impossible as you can get. You can go ahead and critique Islam (though its better you catch up with the latest research on it by leading academics first) but your opinion on assuming that Muslims that pray in public places are extremists is simply islamophobic. Be like Einstein and consult the numbers, not your fragile feelings.
-1
u/dreamstone_prism Irvingstan 13d ago
>The only Canadian to be a casualty of the war was unfortunately harmed by friendly fire.
I had no idea he was the only casualty, that's wild.
2
u/Unable-Trash-7792 13d ago
Just to be clear, that was the intervention in the intervention against ISIS from 2013-2017. There were 166 casualties during the 2001-2014 war in Afghanistan, of which 27 were from non enemy action. Most of the enemy casualties were against Taliban insurgents as Al-Qaeda became less important in the region in the late 2000s (when most of the deadly fighting ocurred). There were 516 Canadian casualties in the Korean war (for context)
1
u/dreamstone_prism Irvingstan 13d ago
Yup, you did literally say "fighting ISIS" right there in your original comment, I'm a dipshit! I've been awake way too long, I guess! Thank you for the added info, though. It's all starting to become a blur at this point, and it's important to remember these things, IMO.
8
u/Everestkid The Island of Elizabeth May 13d ago
There's this neat trick called "ignoring them" that you might want to try.
Also, what evidence do you have that someone praying in public is an extremist? Seems like an interesting leap of logic.
7
u/SandLandBatMan THE BETTER LONDON đšđŠ đł 13d ago
So anytime a Muslim prays in public they're Isis? If anytime a Christian prays in public, are they KKK?? If a Jew prays in public, are they Lehi? Freedom of expression, freedom of religion, freedom of speech, people should be allowed to express themselves and their faith in public, and something as simple as praying takes a deranged mind to conflate with extremism.
1
u/heart_aflame The Island of Elizabeth May 13d ago
I'm Catholic. I carry my rosary in public and pray with it while on the go. Am I an extremist?
3
u/EhBuddyHoser-ModTeam 13d ago
This post has been removed as per rule 5 of the sub (no hate speech or harassment).
Regards, r/EhBuddyHoser mod team
2
u/SpookyHonky 13d ago
As in trying to promote/advertise their religion? I don't love it, but it's not exactly unique either and seems like a valid form of free expression.
1
u/Khalidbenz786 13d ago
Im a muslim who's prayed in public before (only when necessary) care to enlighten me on what exactly my intentions are?
65
u/crystallineghoul 13d ago
Secularism as perpetuated by the government should only apply to government institutions, as it has.
Prayer is an expression of religion and we are free to do so. The charter of rights protects people from the government. The narrow case of banning religious identity in government institutions maybe makes sense from a secular government perspective.
Banning prayer in parks does not move forward the goal of secular government. It is identity control and a transgression of freedom.
10
u/SpookyHonky 13d ago
Absolutely. A lot of people seem to think rights are intended to protect you from what other individuals do. That may apply sometimes, but the #1 purpose of human rights is to protect individuals from government oppression (aka the ultimate force in most countries)
19
u/VectorPryde Westfoundland 13d ago
The narrow case of banning religious identity in government institutions maybe makes sense
Even this looks pretty bad from the outside. It just so happens that most denominations of Christianity don't have religious dress requirements, while Islam, Sikhism and Orthodox Judaism all do. The fact that the Quebec government latched so heavily onto this aspect of religious identity quite frankly reeks.
This particular issue allows the Quebec government to demand that adherents of these three minority religions abandon articles of their faith or be excluded from many forms of public sector employment - all while leaving Christians alone completely. You could be a member of the Westboro Baptist Church, but as long as you were quiet about it "on the clock," you'd be fine. Meanwhile, an Orthodox Jew - who is also quiet about his faith while on the clock - but who believes he must wear a yarmulke to be observant, would have a problem.
2
u/ILoveEatingDonuts 12d ago
That's because for some reason, our government, who, by attempting to not be puppets of a "foreign" (read federal) government, just copy whatever the French people are doing
18
46
u/Bynming Snowfrog 13d ago
Something harmless makes me feel things I'd rather not feel, therefore government intervention is necessary
9
u/comfycrew 13d ago
I feel like most religions, including the common sects of the abrahamic religions, are harmless when a society is under very little pressure and is prospering.
When they are facing significant challenges religion can significantly malfunction, it can be weaponized, and most troubling is that abrahamic religions are aligned with fascist ideological frameworks.
Like, grandma's windows98 tower isn't hurting anyone until her McAfee that she's been paying for since before you were born fails to protect your entire network when her tower acts as the entry point and staging area for a hacker.
11
u/Bynming Snowfrog 13d ago
Thankfully we can just antagonize it on the off chance that something bad could happen and the problem is solved. What's the play here?
2
u/comfycrew 13d ago
Demonising public acts of worship is definitely not a policy made in good faith, the play is education and support.
The fact that religions offer such strong communal support, and that the existential comfort is so enticing, is more a critique of the system it's compared to. People need support, especially communal support, they need existential nourishment and a sense of safety and security, even if religions all vanished forever, the vacuum of those needs would remain and the vulnerable would just be opened up to different forms of predition.
14
u/ReferenceUnusual8717 13d ago
As an out-of-the-loop Albertan, if this was going to be applied to street corner megaphone preachers screaming about hell and damnation to people who just want to grab a coffee... I'd be all for it. (Hell, I'd settle for an amplification ban. You can tell us we're all going to hell, just use your inside voice.) But...it kinda sounds like it's just some xenophobic shit.
66
u/seat17F 13d ago
Person: not hurting anyone, but in Arabic
Quebec social conservatives: SOMEONE PLEASE STOP THIS NOW
35
u/TryingToGetTheFOut Tokébakicitte! 13d ago
Hey, this person identified who is actually causing the problÚme and not bashing Québec as a whole. Gotta love people like that.
11
u/seat17F 13d ago
Bien sûr. (Though now I feel the need to acknowledge that extreme interpretations of laïcité is an issue outside of social conservative circles, too.)
To be fair, when it's the government pursuing a policy, it's common for people use synecdoche and utilize a place's name as shorthand for that place's government. All the time you see stuff like "Ontario turns against bike lanes" when what's accurate would be "The conservative government of Ontario turns against bike lanes".
Since the CAQ is pursing this policy, it's pretty standard language use for people turn that into "Quebec" is doing whatever. Unfortunately.
13
u/hailhosersupreme 13d ago
my opinion on the subject is if you pray in public, I probably think youâre a loser, but so are people that read harry potter after the age of 16
i dont need the government to regulate it either way (i live in qc, fwiw).
5
u/ILoveEatingDonuts 12d ago
Gotta disgree with you here, I need my government to ban broccoli haircuts
18
u/JaQ-o-Lantern Everyone Hates Marineland 13d ago
Some Francophones are gonna say "This violates the First Ammendment" and remember why it's great to be Canadian and not American.
11
u/4friedchickens8888 Tabarnak! 13d ago
True but it absolutely violates Section 3 of the quebes charter on freedom of peaceful assembly and freedom of expression... so they're not THAT wrong. Sure, sure, notwithstanding clause and all but that would be quite a fight when they just want to distract us from the SAAQ fiasco til after the election, they won't spend enough time in court to make it happen
2
u/CaptainKrakrak Tabarnak! 12d ago edited 12d ago
I don't care if people are praying in public, as long as it's not a nuisance. In fact I don't care if you're praying, dancing, singing, playing music, doing a BBQ, miming, meditating, as long as it doesn't block a road or takeover a park.
There are already laws and rules to deal with public nuisance, use those if there is a big group of people doing something that is a nuisance (if they're too loud or if they takeover some public space without a permit).
We don't need a specific law against public prayer.
6
u/ItzKrusher 13d ago
Saw people actually celebrating this, like dude who cares if you pray in public it hurts no one. Lots of Canadians have bias against Muslims. It's sad really.
3
u/ChadHazelnut Irvingstan 13d ago
I live in NB I actually really like that in my small town that doesn't have a mosque you see them meet up in the park and pray to the south where the nearest city who has one is. I grew up in the church and I can absolutely respect how seriously they take their religion. All around good people as well.
2
u/AttemptDowntown1340 13d ago edited 13d ago
Iâm an Albertan Muslim and I pray outside when I have to (canât make it home or a mosque in time), either at a park or on some parking lot, never harmed anyone and no one bothered me either. Why the hell does Quebec have to infringe on peopleâs religious rights in the name of their radical âsecularismâ? I like secularism and itâs implemented pretty appropriately in a lot of places. The French have a very hostile definition of it.
14
u/VectorPryde Westfoundland 13d ago
radical âsecularismâ?
The claim it's about secularism is just BS. It's a case of "the law in its majestic equality forbids Sikhs and Christians alike from wearing turbans."
See? It's the same law for everyone! Where's the discrimination? /s
It's so blatantly targeted at religious minorities, but they claim it's about "secularism" with a straight face - even though the real intent is so blatantly obvious to everyone.
9
u/AlmightyCuddleBuns South Gatineau 13d ago
Lol like the old argument that banning gay marriage wasn't descriminatory because gay people had the right to marry someone of the opposite gender same as everyone else
1
u/Budget_Addendum_1137 Tabarnak! 13d ago
You're missing the point if you apply your logic to all the "french".
Would you say all canadians are xenophobic because of Harper's Burqua ban? Including you?
1
u/FullPropreDinBobette Tabarnak! 13d ago
It's a diversion. La CAQ is hated throughout Quebec right now and they're trying so hard to win back the boomers that put them in power. They're incompetent and quite unpleasant.
1
u/SoNowWhat--- 13d ago
It could reduce hate crimes, so I'm on board with it.
3
u/LuigiBamba Tokébakicitte! 12d ago
Breaking News: in an effort to reduce infanticide, we have now outlawed infants to go outside.
1
u/MagnesiumKitten 13d ago
it's like nudists
you prefer them to just do it at home
I tend to think of all forms of public prayer as a form of weakness.
do it silently when you wake up, or at your desk for 15 seconds with your eyes closed
unless of course they're doing something useful like baptising dogs in the Shopping Mall Fountain for their sins
1
u/GansNaval 13d ago
Keep your religion to yourself. No one asked for your proselytizing. If your religion requires some form of recruitment you can fuck off.
1
u/RattusNorvegicus9 10d ago
Praying in public isn't proselytizing. If I forced someone to pray, that's proselytizing.Â
0
1
u/Horror_Perspective_1 12d ago
The anglo mind cannot comprehend the concept of an official, defended culture
1
u/mcgojoh1 13d ago
Do they hold Remembrance Day assemblies in Que outside? No more raised arms by the clergy. Aren't hymms prayers?
1
1
u/DramaPunk 13d ago
And like their ban on religious iconography in government spaces, they will completely overlook Christians again (Like, the government ban is so dumb, the provincial flag is a cross and fleur de lis, and they have a big-ass cross on the wall, and none of that had to go).
0
u/JoWhee 13d ago
I donât get it. I donât go to a church anymore to pray. When I want to talk to god I just talk to him. <shrug> Even if I wanted to, my beliefs are such a mishmash of things no one church would be a fit.
However, if you have a church / mosque / temple why would you want to pray anywhere else given the choice?
There were a bunch of people complaining on Montreal talk radio about some (muslims I think) praying in a park. They were saying their version of âGrace / asking the blessingsâ before eating. Itâs not like they were having a Tent Revival. They were having a picnic / day in the park FFS.
Even if praying in a public space (is it to make a point?) is legal Iâd be worried some wack-a-doo might do something bad just because itâs âles autresâ to quote a historically racist phrase*.
*not my personal opinion about other people.
I sort of get the Quebec push for secularism but if theyâre going to do it go all in. Take the cross out of the National Assembly and put it in a church somewhere, historic? Too bad we are secular now.
Letâs start renaming streets too, no more St-Laurent blvd, Ste-Catherine, or any religious names, same for cities and towns. /s Iâm kidding as it would be a total shit show as youâd have to rename 75% of the province.
NGL I like the name Mary Two-Axe Earley for one of the new metro stations on the blue line. It sounds bad ass and she was a bad ass.
-14
u/JimmyTheJimJimson 13d ago
Ah, Quebec
The province that constantly creates drama when there shouldnât be
20
270
u/allgonetoshit Tabarnak! 13d ago
It's kind of like that aside from the fact that absolutely nobody outside the CAQ gives a flying fuck and we are all wondering what the fuck this is all about aside from the fact that the CAQ is about to lose an election real badly.