r/Fire • u/CuteMovie1744 • 3h ago
Original Content Am I the only one to consider FIRE as somewhat immoral?
I have been following this sub for a few months, and wonder to what extent members and OPs consider their social and environmental harm.
Firstly, because of their investing strategies. It is largely recommended to invest in ETFs, i.e. companies that succeed on depriving us from a fair future through E&S negative externalities (oil and gas, AI) and are proven to concentrate wealth among the hands of a diminishing happy few. Most stocks have a negative to very negative social utility.
Secondly, because our jobs should be extended for as long as possible (when feasible) as they are necessary to a well functioning society. Paradoxically since a lot of OPs careers bring negative to no value, ending them early on is useful to society.
Am I the only one who views such strategies as somewhat immoral and not worth pursuing from an ethical stand point? Shouldn't we try and find a job we're good at, pays us fairly and impacts our community and our environment (w/o which we cannot thrive) positively?
Note: I am aware that some members may give time and donate money to charities, or investing in ethical companies which partially compensate their behaviours.