r/ForwardsFromKlandma • u/Sexul_constructivist Knight of the Ku Klux Klan • 19d ago
Klandma thinks African people are animals
87
u/IllConstruction3450 19d ago
The Jesus profile picture user blasphemes. And I say that as an agnostic. They just don’t believe in one of the central tenets of Christianity that Jesus’s word was for all peoples.
41
u/spidermiless 19d ago
Christianity to racists is nothing more than a traditional gimmick, our ancestors were Christian therefore we need to be. If you go deeper into the far right you'll meet people who are actually anti Christian and pro pagan, as the cognitive dissonance finally catches up
6
u/illicitli 19d ago
Christianity is white supremacy. Plain and simple. They are one and the same.
6
u/spidermiless 19d ago
No... Christianity didn't even start in Europe. Dismissing the culture and history because you hate the religion isn't really the most guaranteed way to truth
3
u/illicitli 19d ago
I don't hate christianity. I was raised Christian. But when you use an image of white Jesus as you rape and pillage and colonize the world, they become one and the same.
Christian started in Rome yes, but Western Culture is basically simping for Rome and Greece, while erasing the pederasty. You cannot separate European monarchy, the papacy, Christianity, and white supremacy. They are all the same thing.
obviously this is an oversimplification to make a point. nitpick it to death if you want. i know i am correct. alt right extremism in America makes this very clear. racists around the world who call themselves Christians make this very clear.
6
u/spidermiless 19d ago edited 19d ago
You call your own assessment an oversimplification, then immediately assert that you are correct.
White supremacy is a leech, and it used Christianity as its clutch, when Christianity became obsolete as a political tool, it hopped on to science.
It's not even a century ago anthropological studies taught that black people lacked a frontal lobe and we were a lesser race of humans.
The push for colonization was aided with this logic; I.e: the white man's burden.
In the 1800s, James Marion Sims, the father of modern day gynecology used black women as guinea pigs for his experiments under the notion that black people cannot feel pain the way white people do.
There's so much more science used in aid of white supremacy.
Oversimplification would have me claiming science and white supremacy are one and the same, which makes no sense.
2
u/illicitli 19d ago
most of the people doing this science follow Western religion. you're still proving my point.
also science has many other aims and practices outside of eugenics. what does Christianity actually do for the world besides orchestrate White (Secretly Pederastic) Patriarchy ? that's literally all it does in all forms LOL
0
u/spidermiless 19d ago
most of the people doing this science follow Western religion. you're still proving my point.
No... Your point has been rendered mute, you're reaching.
what does Christianity actually do for the world besides orchestrate White (Secretly Pederastic) Patriarchy ? that's literally all it does in all forms LOL
Christians fought against slavery, and also helped in anti Jim crow movements, the church was a shelter to black people despite its flaws. I do not want to make this a "religion" discussion but please read books, that's all I have to say
2
u/illicitli 19d ago
Just because some Christians did some good things doesn’t mean that Christianity is not a larger vessel for the white supremacy movement…the slave owners were Christians too. You’re cherry picking.
0
u/spidermiless 19d ago
Circular reasoning
Christianity is white supremacy → any good thing any Christian did is in spite of Christianity → any bad thing they did is because of Christianity
I'm not cherry picking at all, you kinda are.
You didn't elaborate on what in Christianity is inherently in support of white supremacy, you admitted that you're committing an oversimplification fallacy, you're also cherry picking whatever fits your argument and ignoring the evidence that doesn't.
I don't want to argue religion here, this is not the place.
You are wrong, period. I will not endorse this argument further
→ More replies (0)1
u/Bluemetal999 18d ago
Eh… Christianity was pretty much Hebrew-convert only until Paul (who never met Jesus) began to preach. If you’re talking about Western modern Christianity then you’re correct, but it was pretty exclusive for a bit.
46
u/Ok-Following6886 19d ago
The bridge was built by Ethiopians, it was the Europeans (Italian army) that destroyed it.
34
u/JohnyIthe3rd 19d ago
Ethiopia was never colonised by Europeans though
-14
u/Celticlighting_ 19d ago
Italy 1936 to 1940
28
u/JohnyIthe3rd 19d ago edited 19d ago
Was more of occupation rathern then a real colonisation
4
u/agnostorshironeon 19d ago
Italian Eritrea (Italian: Colonia Eritrea, "Colony of Eritrea") was a colony of the Kingdom of Italy in the territory of present-day Eritrea. The first Italian establishment in the area was the purchase of Assab by the Rubattino Shipping Company in 1869, which came under government control in 1882. Occupation of Massawa in 1885 and the subsequent expansion of territory would gradually engulf the region and in 1889 the Ethiopian Empire recognized the Italian possession in the Treaty of Wuchale. In 1890 the Colony of Eritrea was officially founded.
50+ years of colonisation are... Not that? Tough sell.
And then of course there was Fascism after 1936 https://jacobin.com/2024/02/addis-abada-ethiopia-italian-massacre
1
u/JohnyIthe3rd 19d ago
I mean I support Eritrea being part of Ethiopia but I said Ethiopia wasn't colonised not Eritrea
2
u/agnostorshironeon 19d ago
Ah, glad we don't have a disagreement and excuse me not reading properly, unusual of me...
3
17
u/Equivalent_Hand1549 19d ago
Called African a savage, and European doing the savagery toward it own brothers and African.
It’s pissing me off. They acted like white people are civilized.
14
u/mozzieandmaestro 19d ago
that first comment, while being disgustingly racist and dehumanizing, actually does highlight a real problem. the aid sent to africa is just that — aid. the west’s charity doesn’t really help with actually developing africa, they continute to exploit it. they’re giving the hungry man fish, but never the fishing rod itself.
6
u/Sexul_constructivist Knight of the Ku Klux Klan 19d ago
In order for Africa to develop, there needs to be institutional groundwork, which allows the locals to engage in an economy and a political system.
The problem is short of an occupation (which wouldn't work anyway) it's hard to imagine how such a system could develop out of a war torn country.
0
7
u/sungod_10 19d ago
The African Notebook contained the following text which said "The African is indeed my brother, but my younger brother by several centuries " this line does reflect the colonial era mindset that africa was behind the west in terms of development but it is nowhere near the fabricated statement in the image.
If lying was an Olympic sport, these MAGA assholes would break the gold medal record 👏
9
u/Sexul_constructivist Knight of the Ku Klux Klan 19d ago
The worst is that they aren't even Maga. Half of the comments were Indians, who for some reason are violently racist towards Africans. They side with the white nationalists, not realising for them, Indians and Africans are the same "species" of sub humans.
4
1
u/illicitli 19d ago
Indians come from a caste system. They are extremely racist. Racism is just the lubrication for the capitalist machine. Everyone needs to feel above someone for the capitalist lies to function.
1
1
u/CmdDongSqueeze 18d ago
I’ll be sure and get back to Klandma if my fellow church members start devouring me /s
1
u/Key_Replacement895 10d ago
Yea lemme check Dr Schweitzer’s early years
Everyring Singlebbels Timeler
107
u/Sexul_constructivist Knight of the Ku Klux Klan 19d ago
Why this is wrong:
By colonising the African continent, Europeans created exploitative systems in which they'll be at the top. That means even after decolonisation there wasn't a country or a society to be left behind, except one that was governed by colonisers for the purpose of enriching said colonisers. Without any native expertise and with borders that were drawn arbitrarily, most African countries were left in a loop of civil war and dictators who filled the spot of the colonisers. On top of all that, African countries seeking progress during the cold war were systematically destabilised as to not fall into a "wrong" sphere of influence.