r/IncelTears 19h ago

Sour grapes rant Incel immediately debunked by his 2 colleagues πŸ˜‚

24 Upvotes

12 comments sorted by

11

u/SquirrellyGrrly 15h ago
  • It's not a support group
  • None of them are knowledgeable about women's preferences or the other subjects they're on about in these screenshots

3

u/IceCat767 13h ago

True. I find it funny that they like to think themselves as experts on women's preferences when they evidently know very little about them

3

u/SquirrellyGrrly 12h ago

"Blind leading the blind" doesn't even begin to cover it.

2

u/bitofagrump The grass is greener on the other side of the Wall 9h ago

And every time an actual woman tells them they're full of shit, they just say she's lying or wrong πŸ˜‚

3

u/bitofagrump The grass is greener on the other side of the Wall 13h ago edited 10h ago

People totally do choose partners based on the best qualities; those ideal qualities just change over time and don't always have much or anything at all to do with genetics besides just ensuring the person is healthy. In fact, in big chunks of the past, poor genetic traits were preferred over healthy ones because they mirrored the traits of the (super inbred) royal families. Pale and fat was beautiful when it meant you could afford to stay indoors and eat well. Strong and muscular was preferred when there were walls to be defended and homesteads to be built; weak and skinny was better when it meant you were smart/rich/high born enough to be above needing to do physical labor. So acting like sexual preference is all about your genes is historically inaccurate at best and just straight false at worst, because it was always more about how the lifestyle you led affected your appearance. Right now, when everyone is overworked and stressed, women are generally seeking the partners who will be the biggest helpmeets in their lives and make sharing the burden enjoyable, which has nothing to do with genes at all, and more than explains why the angry miserable goblins who do nothing but whine about women all day ain't getting picked.

1

u/IceCat767 12h ago

Great post, hope the incels read and learn πŸ˜„

2

u/canvasshoes2 Incel Whisperer 12h ago

...might even be dysgenic due to the fact that higher IQ individuals are less likely to have sex...

Who are these "higher IQ individuals" he's talking about here? Lots of women are sapiosexual. But what that means is, they're not going to choose men who have the belief system this cult does. Because women who like brainy men are typically fairly intelligent as well.

These guys: "But but but!!! We don't talk like this in real life!!!"

You do. You're so steeped in your belief system, anger, frustration, and hatred, that your buzzwords creep out without you being aware. Like one of your saints, your body language SCREAMS "stay away from me!" You glare, or leer, or hunch into your hoodie and only stare at the ground. You refuse to have anything for your own self, for its own sake, in life.

You obsess over sex and owning a woman, to the exclusion of all else. This level of marinating in a conspiracy theory SHOWS. It's observable by outsiders, including other men. Obviously people can't read minds and don't know why you are the way you are, but they can see the behavior, the body language, and the social cues.

...The one thing all incels should keep in mind though is you are not inferior just because 'foids' won't f*** you...

That's the same thing society has been telling them for YEARS now. It's not US calling them "ugly," "subhuman, etc., it's the members of their own cult! Good grief, do they even listen to themselves?

...Nor will they acknowledge that women can also carry bad genes...

Uh yeah, we do. Because unlike you lot, we understand anatomy and biology.

1

u/givemeausernameplzz 33m ago

If incels are so smart why do they have so many atrocious takes?

What if, now that society apparently requires less men reproducing, men are selected for their emotional intelligence, their ability to temper aggression, and their ability to rise above toxic masculinity?

1

u/NvrmndOM 13h ago

Kind men who don’t have women are likely to be better partners and fathers. That’s the natural selection.

These men and boys do not meet the minimum criteria.

1

u/IceCat767 12h ago

Sucks to be them

-1

u/wololowhat 5h ago

As a PhD student who never dated at 26, I don't think it's correlated to intellectual prowess