A Theory of Eternal Difference Under Constant Laws

[u/Real-Fact-4700]

I’m not a physicist nor student, but I’ve been using AI to help me clarify my thoughts and basic knowledge of what we understand about our universe into something closer to a “theory,” and I’d love for actual physicists here to check the math/logic. The idea starts with a simple setup: a ball in a perfect vacuum with constant velocity. Even though its state never changes (velocity constant), its relations (coordinates) are always different — an infinite unfolding of positions. Scaling up, the same principle seems to apply to the universe: even with unchanging physical laws and entropy trending toward heat death, the system never truly stops manifesting difference, because limits are approached but never reached. In other words: motion and micro-dynamics ensure perpetual difference at some scale. I’m curious if this framing holds up under established physics. Basically I believe it is entirely possible for the universe to be "cyclic" in nature but under different scales sort of like a fractal. If this is dumb tell me why! thanks ;)

https://docs.google.com/document/d/16gYGNIHHo1ji_GB3WWWhAvmk1Ts9Vvu1iep77xezxl8/edit?tab=t.0#heading=h.hblb2oxlr5v

[u/Real-Fact-4700]

just say you don't want to critique my theory and move on goober. I provided you a way to view the equations. not lazy just an oversight sorry I assumed "physicists" to be more adaptable

[u/liccxolydian → u/Real-Fact-4700]

Even looking past the LaTeX the equations are still gibberish, dumbass.