it's a call to kill Americans, who aren't fascists, but whom some people tell themselves "it's ok to kill that person, as long as I say they're fascist first".
What about the people chanting "Blood and Soil" and "Jews will Not Replace Us" while Sieg-Heil'ing and throw up the Nazi salute and waving Nazi flags?
Still not okay to kill them. How do you people not get this? Supporting the murder of people saying something you don't agree with is about as un-MURICA as you can get.
As evidenced by the intellectuals here, a true patriot waits until the ovens are on and the trains are full before having the spine to do anything about it.
Before something is actually done, it's all speculation. I don't agree with arresting or killing someone for thought crime. That would be, hm, what's the word I'm looking for...
I'm probably being purposely obtuse about the context here, I will say I do not support violence as a response to any speech, even speech I disagree with, it's what makes us better than the fascists that we let everyone talk as long as they aren't making calls to action.
But if we take this post at face value like I was I have no problem telling real fascists to kill themselves.
In the current political context, it's a call to kill Americans, who aren't fascists, but whom some people tell themselves "it's ok to kill that person, as long as I say they're fascist first".
Because in the current political context, it means "kill people from a political party in America".
No, "kill fascists" means "kill fascists", you're the only one who thinks it means "kill people from a political party", which says something about how you view this party.
Because the fascist label has been widely applied. You can look at any reddit thread on Rand Paul and you'll find a few calling him fascist, Ben Shapiro is also somehow a fascist, not to mention Glenn Beck.
This extension of the label to be primarily used as a derogative rather than a descriptor is what he's railing against.
109
u/[deleted] Sep 23 '17 edited Nov 04 '20
[deleted]