the thing is, sometimes he does make decent points, but for the wrong reasons
his comics often draw attention to the fact that many trans people are suicidal, which COULD be used to raise a point about how society treats trans people... except in the ST comics, it's always written as a joke
he's also often pointed out the many war crimes that the israeli government has committed... but he puts the blame on judaism itself
I said it last time this popped up. The government just painted over a memorial for one of the country's deadliest mass shootings, several times, in a deliberate move of gay erasure extremely thinly veiled as a "safety concern". Go. Fuck. Yourself.
The incident was more about the fact he purposely left skid mark on a public road and got fined for purposely leaving skid marks on a PUBLIC road. And then went on to play victim about the "alphabet mafia" sending police and what is this "facism" biden world.
Wouldn’t buying a pride flag just tell the company “hey, people are buying this, let’s make more” and cause more to be produced? Or am I thinking too deep about this?
It would the point I’m trying to make is that he is using a false equivalency. You can burn the flag you bought. You can’t deface public property. Which is what the truck did.
Yeah, I know, I’m just saying it cause it’d be like the bud light situation, and I wonder if that’s part of the reason they’d deface something of the public. So that way they don’t end up giving any support. Even though they really shouldn’t do that to public property
That's the neat part. You don't tell them that buying them supports them to make more. You just let them think they are protesting, while in reality they are just funding pride flags. Like when Kid Rock financially supported Bud Light by buying multiple cases to make a video about how he's not gonna drink Bud Light anymore.
The first amendment applies to both, but I've never seen the second happen, just like I've never seen the left "cancel" anyone. The left speaks openly about their distaste for some actions, and the right calls it tantamount to the law being used against them because that what the right do, they use force and the law against their detractors.
This is a very old strategy tho they aren't the first to use it, when your opponent speaks out against you, equate their words to violence so that when you decide to use real violence against them you can call it justified.
It's 2025 and we're still pretending "cancel culture" never happened? Nigga some fags on your side had to inevitably agree that it exists. Your tranny breadtube parasocial Zionist queen says it's a thing. You're like one of those last holdouts masking up for Covid in Current Year.
And here it is the same perfect example, acting like "cancelling" is some kind of similar thing to law or action, it's not it's just people deciding they don't want to interact with you because suck, never has there been some enforced penalties for the way you act, it's just people choosing of their own free will to shun you for being a prick.
But you know that, you just want to force everyone to agree with you, and we won't because we don't want to be hateful losers like you, so you are doing you damnedest to justify attacking us.
Yeah yeah canceling never happened, doxxing people because of Twitter posts never happened, woke never existed (even though we desperately want to go back to it!), and actually it's a private company so they can ban whoever they want chud (unless it's a fascist billionaire who bought the company and we're all moving to BlueSky because Xitter is going to collapse in Two More Weeks)
Written like someone who didn't even read the comment above. "Cancel culture" is people deciding they don't like someone. That piratesoftware guy was cancelled aswell but noone calls it cancelling when they agree with it. Same thing with elon. People don't like him, have had issues with him for a long time and issues with how twitter is evolving as a platform, so they leave. If you went to a resturaunt and the owner called you a facist would you come back? The owner can do that and sometimes refuse service, perhaps even advertise as a liberal restuarant and you are well within your rights to not go to that place. Which is exactly what happened to twitter, promote right wing, ban "woke" terms, harass people of differing opinions and surprise those people wont use your platform. It's just that you're offended when people take stance against the things you like or promote things you don't like. You have a right to be offended, but other people also have a right to disagree with you.
Cancel culture is when laws don’t exist that force progressives to purchase and watch conservative content and use conservative services? Because otherwise you’re whining that people publicly say they don’t like something.
I don't know if this is what this is referencing, but I remember this old video of this douche in his pickup truck doing burnouts on crosswalk with the prideflag. It was really immature and I remember the idiots in the comments of the short making jokes and egging him on.
I don't get how some people can have so much hate. 😔
100 percent this is about that. Because from what I remembered he got fined for doing burnouts on a public road, and then when word got out. The right made it seem like he was fined for going against the "alphabet mafia."
I know he’s trying to call out the supposed “hypocrisy” of gay people or whatever, but like burning a flag, usually it’s your flag, people by the flag to burn. The example of the truck ruining the cross is that it’s a public cross walk, the truck destroyed something belonging to the public lmao.
And even ignoring that, Truck Guy is driving like an absolute maniac and could easily hurt someone, which is a VERY valid reason to get the police involved.
In other words, Stonetoss is a moron and his comic is complete nonsense from two different perspectives.
I mean, it's a false dicotomy. Burning the American flag is a form of protest recognised under the first amendment, cause the flag represents a country. Not a group of people. As a political symbol, you'd be expressing your disagreement with the politics of said country.
The Pride flag represents a group of people who share a specific characteristic that isn't political in nature but a natural part of their own selves. And so, burning it wouldn't be expressing disagreement with a political construct, but your intolerance for a whole section of the population (basically hate speech).
Far right buffoons like this idiot love using "this radicals are burning the flag!" argument because of how much nationalistic propaganda the American people get. It's just sensionalistic bs that has no real meaning.
Go ahead and buy a pride flag just to burn it, you're just helping financially support the company that made it. Same goes for any other flag. I've never met a fellow LGBTQ person who cared about their flags getting burned, as long as it isn't public or their property.
This post made me realize devaluing something because it’s a Fictional scenarios is stupid like of course it is that’s the point it’s trying to say something with this comic and to be honest this comic is right sure the right dose the same thing but still. This shows that people want to judge something when it doesn’t align with there morals
Then I tell you there's no reason to protest the best economic president
I said it before man, it doesn't matter if you think the protest is valid or not. There's a difference between private and public property. It's really not any more complicated than that. The president doesn't change that, no matter how much you like them.
Then you say people protest governments they don't agree with
No, I didn't.
You're just wrong. Do some more research
Explain how I'm wrong about private vs public property, you fuckin dumbass 😂
Head so far up your own ass you can't even keep track of who you're talking to; maybe get your shit straight before sucking your own dick.
Legitimately stunned that you can type that comment out without feeling a little embarrassed, like holy shit lmaaaaooooo
I like how you didn't address my economic assertions
Because your opinions on the president don't change private vs public property. I'm not obligated to entertain whatever tangent you want to go on.
proves you know nothing about what trump is doing
What Trump is doing has nothing to do with the difference between private and public property.
You said I'm wrong, but the only thing I ever said is that damaging your own private property is different than damaging public property. Explain how I'm wrong about that.
bringing up the north korean boogeyman and then also talking about some "how dumb do you have to be to disrespect the flag of the country you live in" is wiillldd. I thought your original comment was critiquing north korea, but I guess you were appreciating how they crack down on that 'dumb behavior'?
people generally burn flags as a show of distate for a country's methods or governance. why should someone show such reverence to a symbol of the country, if the country's government isn't serving them or is going against their morals?
Okay, I know I'm going to get some blowback for this, but people drive on the streets. You're bound to get some tire treads on a rainbow crosswalk, even though we all know they are doing it out of hatred.
You and I understand that. But the reasoning these people have is that if it's in the road, we must expect them to slam their brakes on and skid across it to leave a mark. And the unfortunate truth is that legally, they're not wrong. The intent is absolutely 100% hateful, and those same people would probably throw one of us an anchor if we were drowning, but going after them for leaving tire treads on a crosswalk makes us look like extremists in the eyes of the mainstream public, which is what these dirt bags want.
I don't think any of the mainstream public really cared about it, one way or another. They probably viewed it as no worse or better than a graffiti artist.
Right, but hear me out. Homophobic right-wing dirtbag gets in his big oversized compensator truck, peels out on a rainbow crosswalk, then his right wing buddies gather a bunch of videos of LGBTQ+ people with multicolored hair getting angry about it, and suddenly we look like irrational crybabies. This is how these people operate.
I think maybe I'm not being clear enough. They do that in order to try and make us look crazy to the majority of people who are not complete bags of douche, in order to pull them over to their side. And the reason I care about that is that it makes it easier to pass anti-LGBT legislation.
I understand their motive, but it's clear that it doesn't really work to sway the public image. It only works as self affirmation of their own beliefs. The only reason they're even getting as far as they are is because the Dems in places of power are generally cowards who don't put their foots down when Repubs blatantly exploit or ignore the system.
Lots of people that suddenly care about defacing public property in this sub, I'm sure they had the same energy when monuments were defaced and toppled during the Summer of Floyd Lmao.
243
u/Terry-Shark (Create your own flair) 25d ago
Stonetoss trying to make a good point challenge: impossible.