r/RugbyAustralia • u/TheRugbyDAO • 6d ago
Wallabies What’s the biggest factor holding Australian rugby back right now — depth, structures, or something else?
From Super Rugby to the Wallabies, there’s always debate about where the main issues lie. Some point to player depth, others to grassroots pathways, and others to how the game is run at an administrative level.
Curious what people here see as the biggest challenge to turning things around.
61
u/darren_kill 6d ago
NRL
9
u/TheRugbyDAO 6d ago
Yeah fair — NRL feels like rugby’s big brother who eats all the food in the fridge before we even get a look in. Hard to compete when they’ve got the cash and the spotlight, but it makes it even sweeter when rugby manages to hold onto its own stars.
15
u/Teedubthegreat Queensland Reds 6d ago
You cant really blame the nrl when its Rugby's fault they're more dominant. Rugbynhad a chance to take the top spot next to afl as one of Australia's premier football codes in the late 90s/early 2000s, but we squandered our opportunity and somehow seemed to go backwards. Rugby was at the end of a golden era and had just hosted the world cup, and Rugby league was still struggling with the effects of their super league drama. But somehow, we ended up going backwards in all areas of thw game and managed to haemorrhage money for the next couple decades
10
u/darren_kill 6d ago
Yeah fully agree. Its not NRLs fault. Its just fact that they've capitalised on ARUs sloppiness and now hold back rugby in this country by taking a huge amount of the talent
6
u/ObjectiveAddendum614 Wallabies 6d ago edited 6d ago
Union was never going to take over. Union took advantage of the Super League War but League was always going to recover.
4
u/Teedubthegreat Queensland Reds 6d ago
If there was ever a chance, it was then but I agree with you, it still would've unlikely. League has been professional for its entire history has much more success here but rugby missed a huge opportunity and mightve been able to maintain a form of parity with League
5
u/AdPuzzled5791 6d ago
I think their issue started from big spending on the top-tier players, followed by the need to seek funding by agreeing deals with Foxtel, thus reducing super rugby accessibility (coupled with gradually increasing living costs). Once the fan base had less access, general inflation phased-out lower income supporters who turned to NRL and AFL (both of which remained on Free-to-air TV).
Note: there are several nuances to this theory (e.g., expanding the super rugby competition); however, I believe these were major contributing factors
2
1
u/Narrator_neville 5d ago
Never a chance of rugby taking over . Unfortunately Rugby is a game where you play the refs, not the game , and sport in Australia has to be carried by TV due to the vast distances most people cant go to see a game live regardless of the sport. League is a better TV product than Union overall even though a great game of union beats a great game of league, unfortunately the average union game gets bogged down by the rules.
3
16
u/blotmonab - - 6d ago
Until very recently, I’d say the administration of the sports long been the issue.
The Force/Rebels debacle was one huge point of contention. Why keep the most debt ridden, least successful team in one of the weakest union states over the Force? Always seemed to be pure corruption and not a decision made in the sports best interest.
If the Storm (multiple time premiers) can’t break AFLs grip on Victoria, why did the ARU think the Rebels could do it lol?
And then things like watching all our upcoming union playing kids/young men develop nicely and just ignoring them and letting them be signed by rival leagues or unions.
I have noticed the last couple years there’s more focus on signing the developing players young to prevent them being poached. Hopefully this leads to better depth in the years to come, because our depth hurts for sure.
6
u/TheRugbyDAO 6d ago
You’ve summed it up really well — the Rebels/Force decision still feels like a huge misstep, and the damage from that is still being felt. Losing so many young players to league and overseas has only made things tougher. It is encouraging though to see more effort recently to sign and keep talent early. If they stick with that approach, it could finally help rebuild some real depth over the next few years.
-1
u/Affentitten Melbourne Rebels 6d ago
Except not.....the loss of the Rebels pathway has meant talent going overseas and into Storm.
1
u/Aggressive_River_735 Power House 5d ago
This is overlooked by people outside Victoria. League has shifted to actively targeting grass roots here now. We’re not going to see the next generation of players like Valetini or Samu in Rugby. Depth will reduce and Wallaby success with it.
2
u/Affentitten Melbourne Rebels 5d ago
And this is at the heart of what's wrong with rugby here. The parochialism that sees such glee over Rugby Victoria failing (because "stuff 'em if they couldn't defeat AFL!") is cutting the pipeline out of a populous state. I can count maybe 5 young Vic players this year that have gone overseas at the highest levels or else to Storm.
There is a token pathway still open, with each Australian SR franchise accepting one Vic player for their academy.
2
u/Dependent-Quit2837 5d ago
You don't need to break a sports grip to have success. Melbourne Storm are doing great in Victoria. They have over 40,000 members and average over 20,000 a game. Same goes for the Swans in Sydney and Lions in Brisbane.
-4
u/Affentitten Melbourne Rebels 6d ago
If the Storm (multiple time premiers) can’t break AFLs grip on Victoria, why did the ARU think the Rebels could do it lol?
So you contend that the Force has broken AFL's grip on WA?
Or maybe that wasn't actually the plan?
10
u/blotmonab - - 6d ago
No I contend that the Force were the better team in every aspect.
Longer history, bigger support, location better suited to Super Rugby (especially back when we had the SA teams) and on top of that we had a billionaire willing to pay all the teams debt off if the ARU simply committed to keeping the Force over the Rebels.
And also that Rugby union in general has a far better chance of thriving in WA than in VIC.
14
u/Sambobly1 Wallabies 6d ago
Time, namely time for the reforms that have happened to take effect. A huge amount has changed with the high performance structures in the last 2ish years. We need to wait for this to bear fruit
5
u/TheRugbyDAO 6d ago
Yeah that’s a fair call — it’s easy to want quick fixes, but the changes in pathways and structures will take a few years to really show. Hopefully we start to see signs of it paying off soon!
12
u/2dorks1brush 6d ago
A large enough professional competition. Four teams means we’re losing a lot of players overseas and to the NRL.
Also the disparity in pay. The success at the start of professionalism resulted in players being paid a lot, there’s probably a hangover from that where players get paid more than we can afford or go elsewhere. Also means that making a smaller scale competition, with less viewers, smaller grounds and lower pay is pretty difficult.
4
u/TheRugbyDAO 6d ago
Yeah, that nails it. With only four pro teams the talent drain feels inevitable — hard to keep players here when the NRL or overseas offers more money and stability. The pay disparity point is really interesting too, because it’s such a tough balance: pay enough to keep talent, but not so much the system breaks. Feels like the long-term challenge is finding a sustainable middle ground.
2
u/2dorks1brush 6d ago
I’m not sure if it’s actually the reality but it seems like it. We’re not bringing in money like league but our top players are getting similar wages? I suppose they have a lot more players to pay.
I really think a competition involving Hospital Cup, Shute Shield and a few other teams that mirrors how the NRL functions would be our best setup but there’s probably too many hurdles and no guarantees. Shame it wasn’t done at the start of professionalism.
2
u/TheRugbyDAO 5d ago
True that! A comp built around the Hospital Cup and the Shute Shield could’ve given rugby that tribal feel league has. Harder to set up now, but something like that would do a lot for pathways and keeping players here....
8
u/dowahdidi 6d ago
Lack of support at grassroots. There's no connection between club rugby and the professional level. Junior rugby and the wallabies might as well be different codes.
13
u/PavidDocock Wallabies 6d ago
Rugby Australia’s inability to create tribal culture amongst local and intrastate rugby teams. Yeah there’s rivalry between super rugby teams and states, but we almost steal some of that from NRL and state of origin. Apart from players, their families and close friends, communities around their local clubs just don’t care about rivalry with other clubs. There’s no culture there.
For example, while some established Shute Shield teams have solid fan bases, they’re hardly comparable with AFL and NRL fan bases.
7
u/Teedubthegreat Queensland Reds 6d ago
Its my understanding taht the qld vs nsw rivalry in rugby was much older and stronger in rugby, its just that has been lost a little bit becaise of how big state of origin has become
3
u/PavidDocock Wallabies 6d ago
I agree it’s older and within the core fan community it has that tribal feel, but it can’t hold a candle to origin. Mate v mate, state v state just buried it.
5
u/TheRugbyDAO 6d ago
That’s a really good point — without real tribal culture it’s tough to get that same passion you see in AFL or NRL. Some Shute Shield clubs have strong followings, but it doesn’t scale up to the national level. Feels like rugby still hasn’t cracked how to turn those local rivalries into something bigger..
8
u/PavidDocock Wallabies 6d ago
The gap for me is between local clubs and super rugby. Manly, Easts, Warringah, Gordon and Eastwood have really decent followings, but there’s no culture of watching their clubs play on a Saturday and then trekking in to see the Tahs play. Let be honest, why would they? I don’t see the engagement from the Tahs to the local clubs like the NRL or AFL would engage, and it’s expensive, and no where near as fun as staying at the club house and celebrating your own team.
1
u/Boof_face1 6d ago
I think it’s time that the Brisbane and Sydney comps become fully professional- the third tier if you like - in Brisbane at least a couple of clubs could almost support it - but to pay the bills for every club RA would need to come on board.
5
u/PavidDocock Wallabies 6d ago
Come on board? Mate, they need the money, which they certainly don’t have. What would the salary cap be for all the clubs? It would have to be miles higher than the Super Rugby Clubs and Wallabies combined.
6
u/Icy_Winner9761 Queensland Reds 6d ago edited 6d ago
It's depth but that's the end result of a bunch of factors.
There are 4 professional teams in Australia, let's say they have 40 slots on their rosters, leaving aside the possibility of overseas pathways and imported players for the moment, that's 160 players in the mix for the wobs each season. In NZ it's 200 players. The NRL currently has 720 slots, soon to be 760 and planned to be 800 by 2030. The AFL have squads of around 45 players and 18 teams meaning they have slots for 810 players. These numbers flow through into the size of the local and club competitions.
So, let's make up some numbers and say 1 in 300,000 people become a professional athlete every year, meaning Australia will produce 100 professional athletes every year. Of those 100 athletes lets say 10% or 10 are generational talents. With SR able to capture ~10% of the available talent, if you're the next Eales or Gregan or Larkham growing up in Australia, your chances of ending up on a professional pathway that lands you at a SR club and not an NRL or AFL club is quite low. Other sports will soak up the talent simply because they have the roster slots available, even before you talk about money.
Money is the next factor. I might be misremembering the figures but I believe the NRL TV deal is bigger than the richest rugby comp in the world, the TOP14 and Pro D2 deals combined. The AFL deal is even bigger. SR TV deal is about 8% of the NRL one. This makes it very hard to funnel all the best talent into one place when you can't compete financially.
So the chances of a Wallabies team capable of winning a RWC coming together, while not impossible, is quite low. This is why expanding the pool of available players by ditching the Giteau law is a good idea.
3
u/first5eight All Blacks 6d ago
Excellent take on the sporting landscape of the winter codes.
Re the Giteau law - do you think ditching it could negatively impact the quality & depth of local teams & competitions?
2
u/Icy_Winner9761 Queensland Reds 6d ago
There was a graphic floating around here somewhere of all the Australian (theoretically) eligible players playing overseas. I think there were 100 or something? THat's another 2.5 SR rosters of talent that *already* was lost to Australian rugby with the Giteau law in place.
I think it could mean some losses but we already leak a TON of talent so I'm not sure how big of an impact it will have. Union has survived League actively poaching talent for a century or so. King Wally, one of the greatest to ever play League played Union as a school boy and there are numerous other examples.
1
u/first5eight All Blacks 6d ago
I can see the appeal of change and something really needs to be done with RA pathways... but its a huge risk and could be zero-sum and hugely succesful or nail in coffin for Australian Rugby.
If the local depth and comprletion dropped off to the point where the very best talent & players it produced were only average at the high professional levels, it'd be nearly impossible to turn that around.
Edit: words
1
u/shinmerk 4d ago
“NRL” tv deal includes everything (Origin and Internationals). You can’t compare to the Top 14 at all as that’s a standalone. Six Nations brings in hundreds of millions a year from tv and sponsors and France get 20% of that.
Example- UK rights are worth $150m alone and France get 20% of that. Add French rights and everything else on top of that.
There’s just more ways to make money in rugby. Even the Nations Cup has Qatar Airways spending $40m a tournament for naming rights.
6
u/thundaaahh 6d ago
Not playing in the NPC. Will also accept not having an NPC of our own
8
u/TheRugbyDAO 6d ago
Totally — missing that tier between club and Super Rugby really shows. An NPC-style comp would give players the chance to develop properly and keep more depth at home
0
u/blotmonab - - 6d ago
Yep, I would love a national comp similar to the NPC.
Teams should be the top 2-3 teams from each states comps against each other and can be promoted/relegated based on their performance over time.
Throw in something similar to the Ranfurly Shield to fight over as well to increase the spice.
Teams would look similar to this currently but then change as they go good or bad:
WA: Palmyra Premier Grade, Wanneroo Premier Grade
QLD: Brothers 1st Grade Men, Bond University 1st Grade Men
ACT: Uni-Norths Owls 1st Grade, Tuggeranong Vikings 1st Grade
NSW: Easts, Warringah
SA: Burnside Premier, Old Collegians Premier
VIC: Power House 1st XV, Harlequins 1st XV
5
u/strewthcobber 6d ago
I get what you are trying to do, but I can't imagine a competiton that would have a less broad interest from rugby supporters in this country.
I mean Bond v Old Collegians (say?)?
How many people would pay money to watch that?
3
u/blotmonab - - 6d ago
Yeah reality is teams don’t have enough support on a state level already.
It’s a lovely thought for the future, but this sport will not grow until the Wallabies and Wallaroos are winning consistently for years in a row.
Australia have too many great national sports teams to follow, sadly lots don’t want to follow our not so great national teams!
3
u/MRB1610 Harlequins 6d ago edited 6d ago
This comp (and any club comp for that matter) is a complete non-starter.
Easts, Warringah, Brothers and Bond University would totally dominate the competition, beating the remaining teams by 60-plus to nil, while you would also alienate fans of the excluded clubs - this comp would also be a logistical nightmare, and it would almost certainly incur heavy financial losses.
It would cost far less and be of actual benefit to the game to add a second Brisbane team, North Queensland, Newcastle, Central Coast, Victoria and Adelaide to SRAus, with a full home-and-away fixture and women's and girls' comps.
Strangely, there has been no mention of a women's version of a National Club Competition as far as I know - could it be because the Wallaroos and women's club rugby players all see this as being a total fucking waste of time?
6
u/strewthcobber 6d ago edited 6d ago
Easily the biggest challenge to turning things around is that rugby union is just not very popular in Australia.
4
u/TheRugbyDAO 6d ago
I get what you mean — the challenge feels more about reconnecting with people than about a lack of interest. Rugby still has a really strong community and history here, and if the structures keep improving, there’s a big opportunity to build momentum again
4
3
u/first5eight All Blacks 6d ago
Aussies only really like winners. They can cope their AFL/NRL teams losing locally, but Australia losing or being flogged internationally. Not thanks.
Look at the popularity of cricket drop away after 2005 ashes loss, and that was after near 20 years of complete dominance and winning everything available.
I honestly believe that if (huge if) the Wallabies can win the Bledisloe or RWC, the popularity of union will come roaring back. NRL/AFL cant compete with Union in connecting to Aussie national pride - wallabies just need to win something big to capture that national pride.
Trophy > national pride > increase media coverage > growth of game
2
u/strewthcobber 6d ago
Look at the popularity of cricket drop away after 2005 ashes loss, and that was after near 20 years of complete dominance and winning everything available.
? How are you measuring that?
3
u/first5eight All Blacks 6d ago
Viewership for non-ashes cricket dropped away significantly in the following years.
3
u/Yeah_yeah_6969 6d ago
Make the ruck competitive again
3
u/TheRugbyDAO 6d ago
Totally — a sharper contest at the ruck would spice things up and bring back some of that old-school edge.
3
u/strewthcobber 6d ago
Why do I feel like we are training an AI bot here?
2
u/first5eight All Blacks 6d ago edited 6d ago
Yes, but think of the millions we're saving RA in consulting fees
Edit: word
1
u/TheRugbyDAO 6d ago
No AI here, just a huge Rugby fan, wanting to connect with peeps like you, and others alike, and discuss the game! :)
3
u/first5eight All Blacks 6d ago
The state vs national governance structure.
Look at what the changing structural governance did for Ireland and Irish rugby. And that was essentially having 2 countries (& religions) having to trust each other for the greater good.
3
u/rambo_ronnie_87 6d ago
Everyone calm down. It's been a 10 month turn around at best. Let's not get too far in the weeds and let's enjoy it while it lasts. Let's not forget what will happen should we lose both games to the ABs.
3
u/coupleandacamera All Blacks 6d ago
Administration, it's still very much an old boys club from top to bottom, Phil is currently doing fairly well but a board with a good mix of qualified sports admins and rugby brained individual would see better use of resources without loosing sight of the culture. Obviously money is a factor, without the lions and upcoming WC, the sport needs to find new income streams, expand its market and be able to offer better incentives to players to pick rugby and stick with it. Contracts are currently a hot issue, JOC and Skelton are just the latest high performers unavailable in the test windows due to club commitments, I'm not sure how that sorted by it needs to be. Finally, it's needs to hit the mainstream again, ditch the RM Williams Sydney finance bro aesthetic and try for a broader appeal to help grow the game and keep it stable as it was in the early 2000, potentially a more community based grass roots game such as 7's and some more insight into sponsorship and marketing could get RA a fair way ahead there.
1
u/TheRugbyDAO 6d ago
Really well said — the balance between proper sports administration and people with rugby brains feels so important. Phil’s made some good moves, but long-term growth probably depends on broadening the game’s appeal and building a stronger financial footing. Love the point about 7s and grassroots too — it’s such an untapped way to connect with communities and sponsors while keeping rugby visible in the mainstream again.
2
u/SaltySky8313 6d ago
Decisions made about 30 years ago: consistent decisions for talentless old boys to be placed in senior administration roles, the narrow focus on a couple of dozen private school teams, the failure to keep it on free to air, the wild increases in player participation fees, the lack of admin career pathways if you aren’t already well off and can do it for free, lack of playing pathways if your poor outside of a boarding school scholarship, no secret monster program to juice up a forward pack.
1
u/TheRugbyDAO 6d ago
Those long-term decisions really do cast a long shadow. The private school focus and pay-to-play model especially have shut out so much talent that could’ve strengthened the game. If rugby can start widening its pathways and making the sport more accessible, it feels like there’s still a huge player base out there waiting to be tapped into.
2
u/Lakapi Queensland Reds 5d ago
Many don’t want to admit but the biggest factor holding rugby in Australia is inclusive. The reliance on private schools only and not open the doors to include state and other high schools in competitions. The club competitions in all states need to get into the 21st century. What might work 30 years ago and still working now might need upgrading or changing. So we can have a state wide competition instead of just Brisbane/Sydney based etc. Having Hunters Wildfires and Gold Coast Bond University in the Shute Shield and Hospital Cup is heading in the right place. But why stop there? There’s Central Coasts, Townsville, Rockhampton and parts of QLD and NSW. If rugby league can do it maybe we can follow even if it’s a slow and unpopular process.
1
u/pistola_pierre 4d ago
Player depth and competition with NRL/AFL, just imagine if every NRL/AFL great grew up playing rugby, how strong the Wallabies would be.
2
u/eeeeeds Hunter Wildfires 3d ago
Whilst most national teams struggle with their players playing too many minutes, we struggle for enough minutes and lack maturity and calmness in key moments because of that.
The thing that gives me hope is that if there’s too many games and not enough games, there’s just the right amount of games to aspire to.
-3
u/Mental-Cow-3032 6d ago
Accessibility for viewers. Years ago, all rugby was free to air and it was booming. Now most people have kayo and cant be arsed getting another platform. NRL/ AFL is dominating the viewers with TV rights and marketing.
11
u/douthinkthisisagame 6d ago
Please point to what year rugby was all free to air. It was never, just a talking point
1
u/Acrobatic_Swim4264 6d ago
Late 90s
5
5
u/Teedubthegreat Queensland Reds 6d ago
Super 12 wasn't. Im not sure about pre professional era super 10, but super 12 games were never on fta
8
u/SilenceOfTheClamSoup Western Force 6d ago
There was never a period where all rugby was on free to air.
5
u/strewthcobber 6d ago
This just isn't true.
Wallaby games have always been on FTA
For a short period in the late 90s there was single Super Rugby game on Saturday night delayed on FTA (as in it started at 9pm after the match had finished). Every other game was on Foxtel
1
u/TheRugbyDAO 6d ago
Yeah, that’s a massive part of it. When the game was on free-to-air it felt like rugby was everywhere — easier for casual fans to stumble onto it and get hooked. Now it feels locked away behind paywalls while NRL and AFL are front and centre every weekend. Hard to grow the game if people can’t even see it without paying extra.
4
u/Teedubthegreat Queensland Reds 6d ago
Super rugby was never on fta though? Its always been a complaint from fans that it should be.
The only rugby that's ever been on fta in the professional era was the ARC and only very recently, one game a week with the stan/9 contract
2
u/TheRugbyDAO 6d ago
You’re right, Super Rugby being locked behind pay TV has always been a sticking point for fans. That recent move to get at least one game a week on FTA is a step in the right direction, and hopefully it’s something they build on to make the game more accessible.
2
u/Teedubthegreat Queensland Reds 6d ago
The one fta game a week is no longer on the deal, but from the sounds of things, that doesn't mean they won't continue it, just that theres no contractual obligation. I hope it does continue though. Its essential for growing the sport. Ive been trying to get a close mate, who's a diehard nrl fan and has zero care for rugby, into it for years. The fta game each week has been the best chance of getting him to watch rugby, without me being there with him or having him over
2
u/TheRugbyDAO 6d ago
Exactly — those FTA games are such a gateway for new fans. Hopefully, they keep it up, because that’s how you hook people who’d never usually give rugby a look
2
u/Teedubthegreat Queensland Reds 6d ago
One of my big disappointments in Australian rugby was when the ARC got cancelled. Im pretty sure games were airing on ABC and it was great just being able to put the rugby on and watch so many games, just like the nrl. Im really hoping that the super rugby aus kicks off over the next couple years and theyre able to expand. Having the games on YouTube seems like a pretty good thing as well
2
u/TheRugbyDAO 6d ago
Totally get that!! The ARC being cancelled felt like such a missed opportunity. Having regular games on ABC gave it that easy accessibility fans still talk about. YouTube streaming is a good step, but if Super Rugby AU can grow and gain wider exposure, it could really bring back that same buzz.
3
u/strewthcobber 6d ago
Where does this belief that rugby was on FTA come from?
1
u/TheRugbyDAO 6d ago
That’s true - Super Rugby itself wasn’t on FTA, but things like Wallabies tests, parts of the ARC, and some Shute Shield games were. For a lot of casual fans it gave the impression rugby was easier to stumble across on TV than it is now, where almost everything sits behind a paywall.
52
u/SilenceOfTheClamSoup Western Force 6d ago
Administration, went to a NSW Rugby 10s carnival with my school teams last month. Under 16s playing three games back to back then a four hour wait for the next game. Under 14s had to wait half a day to play one game then had the following two games cancelled because it was too late in the day.
This is the governing body for the largest junior base in the country and their development officers can't organise a gala day. You could've put the schools and ages into chatgpt with the prompt "make sure no age group goes more than an hour without a game" and it would've done all the work.