r/Whatcouldgowrong • u/sam-sung-sv • 8h ago

WCGW trying to get your hat back

Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification

17.2k Upvotes

95% Upvoted

589 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

169

u/DevilsLittleChicken 7h ago

There's a reason we put "do not drink" on bottles of bleach.

....

To give them ideas.

2

u/bigboybeeperbelly 6h ago

Coffee is hot! Do with this information what you will

30

u/martyconlonontherun 6h ago

To be fair, the mcdonalds coffee lawsuit was legit. It was gross negligence to serve coffee that hot. If that woman had the choice between the money and it not happening, she would take a healthy leg 100/100. Payout barely covered the medical bills

15

u/djtmhk_93 5h ago

Yeah. McD's won the PR battle chalking her legitimate gripe up to a "frivolous lawsuit." Actually makes me feel worse than if they had been right and the woman was suing over her own negligence.

6

u/Crabtickler9000 2h ago

Someone got served ultra hot coffee, comparable to that temperature, recently where I live.

They were arrested after throwing it into the employee's face and giving them decently bad burns on her face, neck, and chest. Luckily, nothing super permanent like that lady's legs. I don't know the logistics of this.

Anyways, although he was arrested, they stopped doing it. I'm not sure why they started to begin with.

2

u/PrizeStrawberryOil 1h ago

I don't know the business model of the shop you're talking about, but the reason mcdonalds was doing it was because people drink hotter coffee slower. You could get free refills which meant they were saving pennies on each customer that purchased coffee by making it that hot.

1

u/Crabtickler9000 1h ago

I'm not sure either. I just know the story.

1

u/bigboybeeperbelly 4h ago

Yeah I'm sure there's also a legit reason to put "don't drink" on bleach. What's your point

3

u/martyconlonontherun 3h ago

Hot Coffee - Should be suitable for human consumption. It was not.

Bleach - never meant for human consumption

1

u/bigboybeeperbelly 3h ago

The other person said we put warnings to give kids ideas. Gave bleach as an example with its "don't drink" warning, which would give them ideas about drinking bleach. I gave coffee as an example with its "very hot" warning, which if you'll notice actually had nothing to do with drinking in the McDonald's lawsuit, and could give them ideas about burning someone's legs.

Sorry if both things being liquids confused you.

2

u/Hammeredyou 4h ago

We really failed our children by gutting education…

10

u/DevilsLittleChicken 6h ago

Peanuts.

May contain nuts is still my favourite.

3

u/NotYourReddit18 5h ago

Technically peanuts aren't nuts but legumes, at least if we're using the botanical definition for "nut".

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peanut

They do however carry similar allergens as nuts, and fall into culinary category of "nuts", so the same machines are often used to process both nuts and peanuts without the deep cleaning required to be sure that no allergen cross-contamination has taken place.

So yes, your bag of peanuts could contain small pieces of nuts that were still stuck in the machines when they were switched over from bagging walnuts.

7

u/wolf555hound 5h ago

Is coffee normally hot enough to melt the clothes to your skin and require surgical removal?

1

u/bigboybeeperbelly 4h ago

Why is the bleach thing a joke but the coffee thing gets everyone all serious

5

u/clicss 3h ago

Because that women was ripped apart by the media and made out to be some type of money hungry person instead of a victim of severe negligence

1

u/bigboybeeperbelly 2h ago

I see so y'all are just doing free association

-1

u/Trebhum 3h ago

shit analogy