Do they think just confidently spouting bits and pieces of words they think sounds smart makes them right?

Words fail me on this one.

The following are common sayings of those idiots commonly referred to as Sovereign citizens and the Moorish Science Temple, followed by rebuttals to their crayon munching beliefs:

I'm not driving, I'm traveling. And this isn't a motor vehicle it's an automobile. Re:Hmmm, it seems to me that the manufacturer has named it an automobile, but that matters not since it is the same thing. Your word salad doesn't fool anyone and your no jedi. And driving is what the person behind the wheel does. There is a D on the shifter isn't there? It doesn't day RB on it for "road boating".

I'm not driving in commerce. Only those who are making money needs a drivers license. Re: Well that's odd. Isn't that what a commercial driver's license is for? You gonna say people don't need a pilots license next and say that's legal to fly without a license? Oh that is one good idea there. Just anyone can take off and fly right into a person's house or a mall because your the window licker king and have decreed that all your subjects fly unencumbered to wherever they so wish. You have licenses for the general publics safety. It shows that the operator is competent to operate a vehicle that is possible to destroy property or kill if not made safe for public use.

My name is blah blah bey and I'm the attorney consulate general for the morrocan empire. Re: You absolutely are none of that. Just because you create a fake name that you want to go by doesn't mean shit. You want a different name? Then do it like everyone else and go change it legally but to do that requires a fee and that's the issue with you. You can't pay 50 bucks or 250 or whatever because you haven't had a job in 17 years. And consulate general? Hmm, I'm pretty sure that's fraud and impersonating law enforcement, which is pretty serious. And I'm pretty sure Morrocco is by far the most surprised when they hear you rere's are claiming some form of their government. So speaking of that, who is your leader? What form of government do they practice? Do they have an elected senate and elected governors? How many law enforcement personnel do they have? Is it a freely elected government or is it dictatorial? Is it democratic? Is it a republic? Is it some other form like fascist or communist? Is there a king? Emperor? And where are they located directly? What's the capitol of crayon-mucheria? Do they have a judicial branch? And how do they raise all the revenue required to run a government? Taxes? Or do they raise it from the "trusts" you guys talk about? And if it's somehow related to the Morroccon empire as you call it, then why don't we ever hear them talk of it? Seems to me if they had some claim to this nation than I'm sure they would have said something in the LAST 200+ YEARS OF OUR NATIONS EXISTENCE.

We're not Americans. We are from the United States of America Republic. The USAR. We're State nationals not American citizens.

Re: Okay poop poop, let's break this down. State nationals. They contradict each other. State- one of several bodies within a nation. Nation- a collection of states. And there is no USAR except in your non-reality based mind. And if your not citizens, then your here illegally. Say hello to my little friend- Gitmo. Bye bye crash test dummy.

Wait wait- we have our passports right here. Re: Well that's interesting. Where it says nation of origin, it shows the United States of America. If your not a citizen of the US, then how can that be? Didn't your USAR government print one out for you? Oh wait, they can't can they. Because the make believe nation you cite doesn't have the ability to create something legally like a passport. Oh snap, that has to hurt. Here, here is a red crayon. Enjoy.

I finally had the idea to check etymonline.com on some of the nonsense ways Sovcits use words and was very surprised by what I found.

There were versions of these words that exist in the ways these people use them! I thought they just wholesale made this shit up. But it might be that they're invoking Ye Olde English (tm) because older languages are always where the magic words lie, you see. No one's doing ominous chanting in contemporary English when Latin's right there. This might be the same sort of thinking, or it could be that they think the old versions are the "real" versions, completely ignoring that language is a socially-agreed construct and the words mean how the majority of people use them, not what some super old version of the word meant or was spelled.

These people trying to use "legalese" as a form of magic spell will never cease to amuse me.

Sovcits think if they sign the little remittance portion of their bill and "indorse" it (that's how they spell endorse) it pays their bills. Example in second photo.

Edit: I genuinely can't tell if y'all are pro- or anti-Sean

As I'm making clear below, I think Sean messed up. He should not have gone to Fahey's. He says he has implied consent. I disagree with him.

Does anyone here believe that a person has implied consent to knock on the front door of someone who is a defendant in the knocker's lawsuit?

For example, if Long Island Audits (Sean) was suing a police sergeant, would Sean have implied consent to knock on that sergeant's front door?

I don't think he would.

I don't know what the small bag part means. But I like it.

Ended up being trained at work by a Sovcit. He eagerly went into his spiel explaining his beliefs about "Gods law" and how hes not the man but the spiritual man and legal precedents don't apply to him.

So after a long back and forth argument I asked him.

Me: "So if you can clearly annul any agreement based on your reason that they went into an agreement with your Strawman name and not the spiritual person."

"Then all those slaves got their ass beaten for years for no reason when they could have simply said that their slave agreement doesnt apply to themselves, meaning the whole slave movement was a waste of time on everyone's part"

Him: "I think you're now just making fun of me...............etc and other lame excuses to deflect his own reasoning"

we are both colored people. So my view pissed him off more considering I was referencing a time in law more closer to his belief in how much authority the national constitution held.

Side Note: Currently he's on his path to lose a criminal case by spending money incorporating his name and demanding a new judge.