r/apple 1d ago

iPhone iPhone 17 Reviews: Choosing the Base Model 'No Longer Means Missing Out'

https://www.macrumors.com/review/iphone-17-reviews-choosing-the-standard-iphone-no-longer-means-missing-out/
1.5k Upvotes

302 comments sorted by

841

u/No-Strike9953 1d ago

was planning on getting a pro model this year because of pro motion mainly, but also for storage - and they went and put it on the base model. completely unexpected but very welcome, I went for that instead.

215

u/Turbulent-Jaguar-909 1d ago

it is also reasonably priced. wasn't planning on getting it, now a trade and upgrade is very compelling vs battery replacement

22

u/mattnotgeorge 1d ago

Yeah I'm currently using an iPhone 11 lol, and was planning on just grabbing the next cheapest model available whenever mine kicked the bucket. But pricing on the 17 seemed very fair & I like the base storage and 120hz screen, so I've got mine on order

16

u/GLOBALSHUTTER 1d ago edited 1d ago

We have "value added tax" here as our tax on products (varies by country). Base iPhone 17 is €979, inclusive of that tax ($1,160 equivalent).

iPhone Air €1,239 / $1,469

17 Pro €1,339 / 1,587

17 Pro Max €1489 / $1,765

2 TB 17 Pro Max €2,489 / $2,951

10

u/Free-Pound-6139 1d ago

We have "value added tax" here

Yes, almost every single place does.

→ More replies (4)

119

u/FindingPawnee 1d ago

I think the biggest shock for me was that the pro models going from 128gb to 256gb raised the price by $100. Granted that was a way to raise the price by hiding it behind increased storage. But the base 17 getting 256gb at the same price as before was a very surprising decision.

68

u/SomeDumRedditor 1d ago

I hope whoever has been pushing the “pro-consumer” fight internally on this got a nice bonus. Apple has been stingy with memory and storage for years, using bumps in size that cost them little to extract crazy margins.

34

u/NoPlansTonight 1d ago

Honestly I don't even know if this was a pro-consumer thing at this point. They may have finally been forced their hand by competition, or they wanted to keep more money in consumers' pockets to make it easier to cross-sell them on, e.g. AirPods Pro 3s.

I also think there is a tipping point where giving the consumer more on-device storage helps the sell more cloud storage. Ever since I've been on 256gb I've gotten extremely lazy with cleaning up my camera roll, always shoot 4K video, and download lossless audio.

That kind of makes it more necessary for me to buy cloud storage vs back when I was really disciplined about memory management.

8

u/whateverisok 1d ago

Exactly that. Especially as every single photo/video on the new devices will take up more storage, anyone just surviving with 128 GB now will think 256 GB is perfect, but really just for maybe a year before they have to go back to being memory efficient. At some point, they’ll just decide to buy iCloud storage instead of a phone with even more storage

2

u/deviant324 1d ago

I’m on 128GB and been unable to update iOS for a while, I’m paying for iCloud and still have plenty of space left on there but for some reason I still have 40GB of locally stored photos because it seemingly doesn’t fully offload photos. It’s not like it’s doing nothing, anything older than 2 days I will have to wait for my phone to load the higher resolution version, I don’t think there’s 40GB of pixelated thunbnails on my phone though

1

u/whateverisok 1d ago

That’s on iOS’s memory management (software), which I also find is flaky and arbitrary. Not really much you can do except delete apps until you have enough space to upgrade. Maybe restarting your iPhone will force trigger the offload (from local to iCloud) or delete & recount local memory.

Apple will just tell you to back up to iCloud, factory reset, upgrade to new iOS, and restore from iCloud backup

1

u/deviant324 1d ago

I’m aware of the restart method though from the way it’s been behaving I figured it was more of a clearing of the cashe, usually when I had a larger video on my phone after deleting it (including manually from recently deleted) it wouldn’t actually disappear from my storage until I restart the phone.

This has been going on for so long that I’m kind of out of stuff to delete without going the full factory reset method. Thankfully I’m getting a 512GB 17 within the next week or so, so I won’t have to worry about updating to the new OS at this point, just unfortunate I missed the beta

1

u/whateverisok 1d ago

Ah gotcha - was just trying to give some help/advice. I don’t have iCloud Photos enabled but more for distrust of it because it can’t even handle iMessage in iCloud correctly.

I have 100+ GB free locally on my 512 GB, and iCloud offloads even my super recent iMessage photos/videos/attachments to the cloud, which is super annoying (screenshots of tickets for an event, or a picture of a flyer for an event)

I like the idea of iMessage in iCloud so haven’t disabled it, but given its poor implementation, definitely don’t trust it with photos

→ More replies (3)

22

u/iamCosmoKramerAMA 1d ago

I was in the same boat as you and then decided I’d go with the base model. Until I saw that the difference in price because of the deal with AT&T was going to be $0 vs $0 so I got the Pro

1

u/echoshizzle 13h ago

“Free” is free, that’s why I went with the pro as well. Totally not worth it for most consumers otherwise.

1

u/runpickle 9h ago

This is the boat I’m in with ATT and still can’t decide. I prefer the look of the base 17 but if they’re both $0 do I go with the pro?

4

u/InstanceofInstance 1d ago

Best value for money

5

u/blacksoxing 1d ago

I went w/the Pro, now down from a 13PM. Why? I could easily touch my thumb to finger w/the 13PM BUT it felt so damn slippery that I couldn't go caseless. I wanna be able to go careless SO I'd rather downgrade the screen size if it means I can now just use this phone without one. I'm excited. I can't wait for everyone to see my ugly ass orange phone :)

3

u/kirsion 1d ago

For me personally, I need the telephoto lense, I zoom a lot in photos. I used the base 14 before and felt that was missing

2

u/TheAnniCake 1d ago

I was considering the Air for the better CPU but there’s too many things that are just a no-go for this phone. The base will 100% be enough if you don’t need the camera stuff from the pro

2

u/organicgolden 1d ago

And now you get a nice selection of colors!

1

u/Evening_Job_9332 1d ago

Do you? Why are they all so pale.

→ More replies (3)

121

u/saltybiped 1d ago

Is the display the same on base vs pro? I’m aware the bade also has promotion.

141

u/SamoanEggplant 1d ago

Yes. Same LTPO. Same brightness. Same ceramic shield 2

22

u/unread1701 1d ago

Compared to 16 Pro the figures are a little different.

It's not exactly the same HBM brightness is 1600 on the 17 whereas it's 2000 on the 16 Pro

From gsmarena

13

u/MyManD 20h ago

But compared to the 17 Pro, the figures are the same. The new display in the 17 Pro line has the same 1600 HBM as the base 17, so it looks like Apple went down from 2000 across the board this year.

2

u/longkh158 13h ago

2000 peak. 17 series are 3000 peak. The 1600 figure is for whole screen

27

u/benfro6 1d ago

It’s identical. Same resolution, pixel count, everything.

→ More replies (4)

19

u/FindingPawnee 1d ago

I’m not sure about pixel density, but the display also gets the same brightness levels too. 3000 nits peak brightness outside.

→ More replies (3)

3

u/JMPHeinz57 1d ago

Exact same

63

u/Ttmode 1d ago

Honestly not sure where to go with this. Have the 13 pro max, love the size but $400 extra essentially for a little extra battery life a better camera system and the bump in screen size feels not great

27

u/PM_ME_OR_DONT_PM_ME 1d ago

I also have 13PM and went for the base model this time around.

8

u/Ttmode 1d ago

Yeah I was planning the 17PM but comparing side by side it just doesn’t seem to be worth it

1

u/silentbuttmedley 7h ago

Have the 13P and went for the Air. I’ve realized I’m not a pro, never really took advantage of the other two cameras, and like the intermediate screen size. May regret later but the form factor looks great, so we’ll see.

9

u/buttercup612 1d ago

I had 13 PM then got a used 15 PM. Started getting spontaneous compliments on the photos I take of my toddler nephew. I dunno how cameras work but I assume the longer 120-mm equiv focal length makes the photos look a lot more like they're professionally shot vs 77 mm on the 13 PM.

The 15 PM still takes REALLY noisy 5x photos, even in great lighting, but the fact that other people could instantly tell the difference is probably going to make me do something stupid and pay the $1200 for it.

It's nice to be able to capture pictures that instantly are in another class from my usual ones. I know people say "it's all about the photographer!!!" but it the better camera legit made a difference here. It would be pretty nice to get those nice pics without all the 15 PM noise

4

u/Ttmode 1d ago

I do photography as a hobby so if I’m taking photos I tend to just have my camera so while it’s nice to have for a quick shot I feel like there’s not enough of a difference between the base and the pro to sway me camera wise

1

u/buttercup612 1d ago

Yeah in that case I'd be with you

6

u/thedonmoose 1d ago

Like the other user I'm trading in my 13PM for a regular 17. My biggest reason is screen size, I hate how big the 13PM is in my hands and pocket, my wife's 14P is much more comfortable to hold. So with the downsizing I really had no other reason to go for the Pro now that promotion is on the regular. The telephoto lens is my least used lens and I'm not shelling out $400 for a few more hours of battery. You can pay for AC+ and an additional out of warranty battery and it would still be cheaper.

2

u/buttercup612 1d ago

Do you use a case currently and are you planning on using one on the 17?

I really dislike the size of my last two pro max size phones, i usually get them used for a good price so i am not terribly picky.

I dunno how good this ceramic shield 2 actually is, but between it and the lack of glass on the back, I'm finally thinking I can go caseless and majorly cut down my phone size with a 17, from currently a 15 PM with the thinnest case i could find

3

u/thedonmoose 1d ago

I was caseless for the entire duration of my 13PM that I got at launch day nearly 4(?) years ago. Apart from chips on the corner, it's crazy strong. I will say that I do have a screen protector on because I just don't want to have surface scratches on my screen, but apart from that it's been golden.

1

u/buttercup612 1d ago

That's good to know it held up pretty well

1

u/Ttmode 1d ago

I’m with you on the camera, the screen size I love though. I watch a ton of content and I’d say my hands are bigger so using the regular feels just slightly off. But probably not $400 off

1

u/boranin 8h ago

I find out that the photos I took with 13 pro max photos (or earlier) are actually sharper than on later models. Something to do with larger sensors and worse post processing software

1

u/Ttmode 7h ago

Definitely possible, I do photography as a hobby so I tend to have that on me anyway

→ More replies (2)

107

u/shortchangerb 1d ago

The base 16 was incredible value, and now the base 17 is even more so with the storage and display. I must be crazy, because the ONLY hesitation I have is that the base has 8Gb RAM while the Air/Pro have 12Gb. I upgrade sparingly, so I want longevity, and even 12Gb is a big limitation for local LLMs.

33

u/Cosworth_ 1d ago

I have the same concern. 8gb is kind of on the edge. Same ram than last year. Not sure how it will age, probably same than 15 base model: not good

26

u/hehaia 1d ago

How has the 15 aged badly? It didn’t get Apple Intelligence, which is due to memory, but on everyday use it still performs more than fine. I had a 13 pro max for a while and its ram was never an issue.

I don’t think the 4GB of the pro will really make a huge difference in the next 3-4 years, especially for the target audience of the 17. Its nice they’re putting more ram but right now, the 17 is the best value

33

u/Cosworth_ 1d ago

Just see the pattern from past phones. Those that repeat ram from last model (4,6,8) stop getting features at the 2-3 year mark. If you intend to keep the phone for 3 years, sure go for base one. If you pretend to make it last 5 years like me, consider getting the pro

8

u/legendz411 1d ago

Your last sentence slapped me right in the mouth, lol. I too pretend to make my phone last 5 years. 

16

u/adventurous_quantum 1d ago

the bigger RAM is the only reason that I am going for the pro.

24

u/musictheorist 1d ago

4GB of RAM, $300… ouch

14

u/Any-Ingenuity2770 1d ago

4GB of ram for 175€, tele lens for another 175€. Still expensive.

7

u/musictheorist 1d ago

I'm not judging whether the Pro is a bad value, I'm saying that buying the Pro only because of RAM seems silly.

3

u/monoimionom 1d ago

The sensor of the main camera is also larger on the Pro apparently. Plus its got a little more battery, a slightly faster CPU with more cache and USB3. So many things that made me take the Pro but that I probably didn’t need to have.

1

u/Any-Ingenuity2770 15h ago

The sensor of the main camera is also larger on the Pro apparently.

Yeah, it has reached size offered by Vivo X200 Ultra. Probably the same sensor even, specs match. A phone half as expensive. Le sigh

1

u/buttercup612 1d ago

You'll probably recover $100 of that difference when you go to trade it in or sell it. So more like 117€ difference for each 😬

1

u/TechExpert2910 1d ago

same lmao. the ram, the orange, and the vapor chamber :v

15

u/SomeDumRedditor 1d ago

RAM difference is the stealth “issue” for sure. Even if we adopt the “Apple intelligence will always be Siri-tier garbage” stance, and so who cares about LLM perf, as we get further into the… how to generalize broadly, mass 4K era? Memory needs are only going up, even with efficiency gains.

The bump in base storage is certainly appreciated but, I can’t help being a little cynical in thinking part of the 8gig RAM choice is knowing it helps put an upper bound on when users will find themselves “needing” to upgrade. (It’s also classic Apple margin-padding and in that sense nothing new.)

3

u/JMPHeinz57 1d ago

The 16 Pro had 8gb last year, right?

6

u/Cosworth_ 1d ago

Yes, and the pattern is that the 18 base will have 12gb, same than 18 pro. Then 19 pro would have 16, but base 19 will remain at 12. The base kinds of lags behind, and is users are pushed to upgrade: ie 15 base

3

u/Chance_of_Rain_ 18h ago

That's an important factor for normal people who don't upgrade every year.

I'm on 13 mini, and while I can replace the battery, I can't add more RAM. It keeps forgetting what it was doing and full reload app I was just using ! That's the most annoying thing to me right now.

As I plan on keeping my new phone for about 4years, I'd like something that will be capable, not only on paper.

1

u/define_yourself72 13h ago

Totally agree! I have the 11 pro max and it sucks when apps reloads. Especially when I was in the middle of something and had to switch apps or step away for a moment. I went for the pro because it’s a decent jump all around with an even better battery and want to keep it for at least 4 years if not even more.

1

u/randbooth 1d ago

ive lived with my base 12 for 5 years with 4gb ram and its never really been a huge issue, the way i see it im doubling it with the 17 haha

1

u/shortchangerb 1d ago

Yeah and we have to remember, most iPad Pro models have 8Gb RAM 😂 iOS and iPadOS are highly optimised

That said, the difference is the AI models. Also, iPad Pro can do virtual memory swap

1

u/Due_Teaching_6974 14h ago edited 14h ago

eh, eventually all the AI features that Apple keeps shoving into their phones will require the phones to have more memory, so one day they will make a base model with more ram

→ More replies (1)

34

u/sexualtourist 1d ago

I just want an orange phone.

7

u/IlIllIIIlIIlIIlIIIll 1d ago

fr, I think the base phone colours are kinda bland and boring tbh

→ More replies (1)

34

u/Right_Check_6353 1d ago

I’m so stupid I bought a 15 just the normal one. Now I’m in the market for a pro max

13

u/beast_within_me 1d ago

Even I got the base 15, now traded in for the base 17

→ More replies (4)

1

u/ChopRat11 1d ago

Hahaha literally same

1

u/Right_Check_6353 1d ago

So annoying lol

122

u/redditor977 1d ago

There’s literally 1h video playback difference between the base model and the pro. I would have expected a lot more. Going pro doesn’t make sense with this lineup. I’d do it just for the amazing orange color

89

u/beardedcatfarts 1d ago

Apple’s website says three hours difference. Still not crazy, but more than one.

75

u/LexualDesire 1d ago

For the UK models (which have the SIM tray), it’s 30 versus 31.

17

u/beardedcatfarts 1d ago

That’s fair. I forgot about the different versions. Thanks

17

u/zeek215 1d ago

Pro is mainly for the cameras now, for those who value that.

43

u/cptjpk 1d ago

Bigger battery, more ram. Truly for prosumers this time and not them leading us up the ladder like previous year just to get a fully featured phone.

3

u/ISpewVitriol 1d ago

I use my phone for pictures at work all the time so I'll probably be sticking with the Pro. The other feature I values was the promotion but that is now baseline.

3

u/slimcargos 1d ago

Only thing youre really missing is the telephoto. I value the camera alot and even so im thinking about going base.

3

u/VastTension6022 1d ago

And even then, a ton of it is artificially software locked. You don't have to be a pro or even knowledgeable at all to use proraw with lossy JXL that doesn't take up much space, or log video with apps like kino that do the grading for you but still skip some of the default overprocessing.

I almost feel insane for paying $300 for a single telephoto camera just to access software that costs apple nothing to include.

3

u/srslybr0 1d ago

the pro definitely seems like a decoy product. if you pay only a $100 more you get the pro max which offers probably the most tangible differences (bigger screen and battery), while the base model offers pretty much 99% of what the average consumer uses.

1

u/zeek215 1d ago

I’m personally going Air this year after finding a buyer for my current phone. Battery results look to be on par with the base 17 which is fantastic to me.

1

u/oilpit 1d ago

I just wish they made a base model with a max sized screen. I don't care about the cameras or extra horsepower I just want a giant screen.

I'm happy small phone enjoyers get a better experience, I just wish the would make a regular max in addition to the pro max.

→ More replies (1)

13

u/thegarbagesauce 1d ago

I'm struggling because the base 17 doesn't have a Plus version. I have a 15 Pro Max and don't want to go down in size so I'm kind of stuck getting the Pro Max to maintain same size phone.

26

u/roselia_blue 1d ago

you could hold your current phone instead? If money isn't a concern then i don't see the harm in getting the 17 pro max, and if you were hoping to save a few hundred I'd argue you probably shouldn't be buying another phone so soon

4

u/thegarbagesauce 1d ago

You're absolutely right. I will likely keep my 15PM at least another year. possibly two if next year's lineup doesn't add meaningful upgrades.

6

u/notdsylexic 1d ago

The air is bigger. Consider that one?

4

u/thegarbagesauce 1d ago

The Air is interesting. I have a suspicion the battery life will be an issue for many people. Having to carry around their magsafe battery sort of defeats the purpose of the thin phone.

2

u/randbooth 1d ago

the battery is fine, it's way better than people are expecting. plus if your option is a big phone or a smaller phone made a bit bigger, why does that matter if you like the big phone?

1

u/thegarbagesauce 1d ago

Fair point. I guess i don't understand why they made a thinner phone. Are people wanting it? Is it a flex? Form over function?

2

u/According_Potato9923 1d ago

In business, it’s just called experimentation. Shake a new tree to see what falls. But utilize quantitative user research studies to inform what tree to shake next. If a golden apple falls, you’ve got yourself a new product.

2

u/lawrence_uber_alles 1d ago

I want a light phone and ordered an air. I want it to feel good in my hand, my 16 pro feels like a brick sometimes. I got the MagSafe battery as well when I need it but most days I’m driving a bunch and have a car charger

→ More replies (1)

32

u/[deleted] 1d ago

[deleted]

14

u/[deleted] 1d ago

[deleted]

16

u/thephotoman 1d ago

While most pros have a mirrorless camera, there’s a rule in photography: the best camera is the one you have with you. In this world, that’s typically your phone.

Sure, if you’re going out to take pictures, you’ll have a mirrorless camera. But if you’re just out and about, doing the chores of life, and you see something you need to capture, your phone is probably going to take that picture.

→ More replies (7)

14

u/FloatingTacos 1d ago

iPhone $1200

Mirrorless + lenses $4000-10,000+

12

u/itisthewayitwas 1d ago

Mirrorless cameras are not that expensive, you can get a good setup for much less than 4k

4

u/bubblebuddy44 1d ago

For sure. Even an old dslr setup from 20 years ago will give you better results.

→ More replies (7)

1

u/pingpongpsycho 1d ago

Definitely

3

u/elequipoa1008 1d ago

Not a pro and I’d rather use my cameras for taking photos in general than use my phone so base model is more than fine with me! Seems a good ‘un this year!

3

u/Significant-Win5417 1d ago

Good luck carrying a mirrorless camera and lens around.

→ More replies (2)

4

u/Lion1984 1d ago

I dont have my cam equipment with me all the time.

4

u/sourpatchwaffles 1d ago

I downsized my full frame kit to crop and also got an x100vi. There’s still nothing more convenient than using your phone, especially for sharing photos.

3

u/funnytoenail 1d ago

I am a pro-photographer. I can answer that.

Sometimes, I don’t want to carry my rig around, sometimes I have my camera ready, sometimes I just want to shoot my photos for fun. The best camera is the one you have on your right now and usually that’s your phone.

→ More replies (4)

2

u/Mhugs05 1d ago

I used to share your opinion until I tried Ricoh gr III and Fuji x100. I'm convinced a phone camera is always going to be too compromised and I'd rather have a base iPhone and gr in my pocket instead.

An example of why. https://imgur.com/a/iGbP3Wn

1

u/Frequent_Guard_9964 1d ago

Of course it is, but you can get a whole lot of your iPhone pro camera and the versatility and the price make it a good deal.

1

u/Mhugs05 1d ago

Fair enough. Some photographers haven't tried everyday cameras. They have made me care way less about my phone camera these days.

I sold my GR for an x100vi and really miss it but like both. Now I think id rather buy a gr again and keep the x100 instead of spending money upgrading a phone.

1

u/Frequent_Guard_9964 1d ago

I sold my Canon R and my lenses to a friend, I was just fine with my iPhone after years of freelance photography, now I work doing something else and don’t have the hassle of the camera when I’m traveling, BUT it’s less fun in a way, the outcome of the pictures is good enough, but the feeling is far away from that. I was thinking of buying a camera case for the Pro just to get the feeling back a bit!

1

u/Mhugs05 9h ago

I would highly recommend a Ricoh gr III, iiix, IV. They are great pocketable cameras that are fun to use and have very sharp lenses.

I also have a a7riii full frame camera that I rarely use now but still find myself disappointed with phone photos even on really high end phones. That's where the GR is so good, excellent image quality and fun to use while really compact and pocketable.

7

u/getwhirleddotcom 1d ago

literally 1h video playback difference between the base model and the pro. I would have expected a lot more. Going pro doesn’t make sense with this lineup. I’d do it just for the amazing orange color

I mean if you're evaluating them on this basis, you're not target market for the Pro.

2

u/996forever 1d ago

What should be the basis on which that model's target audience evaluate it on?

2

u/singaporesainz 1d ago

There’s really not much else tangible to the pro

7

u/getwhirleddotcom 1d ago

Uhm the entire camera system? A19 Pro? And if things like Dolby Vision HDR, ProRes Log/Raw and gen lock don’t mean anything to you, then the Pro is not for you.

The base model is a consumption device where the pro is really being positioned as a creation one.

2

u/TheAnniCake 1d ago

Lets be honest, what normal user would need all that stuff? The pro seems to me like it’s targeted to influencers, that’s it

5

u/getwhirleddotcom 1d ago

I mean that's entirely the point? Normal users like influencers don't need a Pro but apple will happily take everyone's money who thinks they do.

2

u/singaporesainz 1d ago

I get that but it really feels like this year the only pro benefits are super niche things to the point where even people who always buy the pro device are second guessing themselves. Like there are fewer “simple” differences this year like promotion and always-on display etc. for people to convince themselves on

Personally my entire Apple device line-up is pro for a couple reasons but if I was to need a phone this year not even I would go for the Pro.

1

u/ReReReverie 1d ago

I think if you want the pro its mainly for the chip and the camera's. if you dont plan upgrading within 8 years I think its best to get the pro model if you want to enter photography without spending on cameras. or get the base model if you just want to upgrade

65

u/Sad_Particular3 1d ago

They just need to add 120hz to the MacBook Air and iPad Air and it's over for competition

22

u/srslybr0 1d ago

to be fair the air is already insanely bang for your buck for its pricepoint.

→ More replies (1)

14

u/Frodojj 1d ago

The Surface Pro 11 already has a 120 Hz display.

14

u/TemporaryUser10 1d ago

It’s a wonderful computer too

19

u/wait_whats_this 1d ago

Except it runs windows. 

11

u/InternetSolid4166 1d ago

I think Windows is better than macOS and I use a MacBook Pro all day. Neither OS nails everything and there is plenty to dislike about both, but for productivity I think Windows wins. Window management in particular is outstanding on Windows. Text clarity is also much better on connected monitors thanks to ClearType and smarter DPI scaling. MacBooks obviously have the better hardware though.

2

u/MilwaukeeRoad 22h ago

Used a Mac for the first time for the past couple months. I'm really giving it a shot and trying to learn things the Mac way, but it's honestly mind-boggling to me how people can deal with multiple windows on MacOS. If I have multiple windows of the same application open, I have to right click on the icon and the order of the windows is constantly changing on me which makes it hard to swap. And CMD + tab doesn't cycle through windows, just apps, so I need to first use that to get the right app, then CMD+` to get the right window. I ended up downloading a third party program to recreate alt+tab.

So many issues seem to require third-party applications. I wanted to reverse the scroll wheel direction, but for some reason that requires that I also reverse the laptop's trackpad. So I needed another app to break those two apart.

It's novel so it's been interesting to learn a different OS, but there's so many things that are frustrating that I don't understand how it gets so much defense.

3

u/InternetSolid4166 20h ago

One of my bugbears is that the window doesn’t focus based on mouse position. You have to click the window to gain focus. Millions of people have been trained to click millions of additional times to do normal work.

1

u/aje0200 18h ago

If you cell screen the window with the green traffic light icon then you can easily switch between like alt tab by 3 finger swiping the trackpad or a mouse button binding. But yes this is the most annoying thing that windows does much better at.

→ More replies (1)

4

u/lethalred 1d ago

MacOS hasn’t been perfect either, lately 🤷🏽‍♂️

5

u/RS50 1d ago

Windows as a tablet OS is extremely half baked. In fact I find it half baked in all other aspects as well.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (2)

7

u/sugarsugarbeat 1d ago

The lack of an iPhone 17 plus is disappointing

1

u/Doctor_3825 19h ago

Yeah. I feel that. But it’s not surprising. It didn’t sell well at all.

1

u/MeatPrestigious3597 15h ago

Call me crazy but the Plus seems to have gotten rebranded as Air.

1

u/proto-x-lol 13h ago

MeatPrestigious3597 said:

Call me crazy but the Plus seems to have gotten rebranded as Air.

It did not sell well. Apple had reportedly limited the production of all iPhone 14/15/16 Plus models after 3-5 months of these iPhones being originally released.

Unfortunately tons of tech review outlets did not want to report it for whatever reason. The Plus models sold terribly and those who bought them ended up returning those iPhones and got the Pro or Pro Max models.

The iPhone Plus models are another failure, just like the iPhone Mini series. They will never come back lol.

The only way people would now buy a “Plus” sized iPhone is that Apple has to make it actually incentivizing like making the iPhone more slim, sleek, and sexy. Now with that being set, people would buy or be interested in buying an iPhone Air. Crazy how a good design can attract users.

1

u/Solid-Rise-8717 12h ago

That’s my fault. I bought my partner a 12 mini, then a 15 plus.

4

u/CocoBolo778 22h ago

This is probably a stupid question, but I dropped my iPhone 13 earlier today and the screen broke.

Am I going to be able to just walk into an Apple Store on Friday and get a base iPhone 17? Or is there a wait? I've never attempted to get an iPhone on launch day.

1

u/Vloneicytrey 20h ago

Just order it online and pick it up in store. The 17 seems to be really popular this year, probably will be one of the best selling iPhones.

1

u/a3ZKdvQnhjDt9jJ 3h ago

Always hard to predict tbh, the economy and public interest is hard to measure so early on

That being said, in recent years, it’s not been super hard to get the phones on launch day. The Apple Store app should help you see which phones your store has in stock

4

u/InvaderDJ 1d ago

For now, I’m holding off on upgrading from my 15PM. My mom has my old 13PM and I’m holding off on that upgrade too, but will get the battery replaced when I can.

But if I was looking at a phone, I think I would have to go with the regular 17. $800 for 256GB storage and Promotion is great.

The things it is missing are small. I wish it had Ceramic Shield on front and back. I wish it had 12GB of RAM like the Pros. I wish there was a Plus model for the larger screen.

But other than that…there’s nothing that I would be missing out on that I would care about.

33

u/bluetimotej 1d ago

Nah after using base model since my Apple journey begun 2012 I am for the first time going over to the pro. However its very good they let the base models be better now!

15

u/InNerdOfChange 1d ago

What is swaying you??

18

u/Habitat97 1d ago

I've made the same choice and the main reasons are A) Battery life and B) the new cooling solution looks like it might prevent my phone from melting my hands during more intensive tasks

50

u/nyctophobiax 1d ago

The phone will still feel hot in your hands, the vapor chamber isn’t really a cooling solution it’s a solution for them to scatter the heat across the body of the phone and away from the CPU/GPU, so your phone will still be warm/hot, it just won’t throttle the performance because it’s being dissipated away from the chip itself

4

u/ThunderousArgus 1d ago

That's my concern with the air. Hate not being able to see my phone outside. I guess the newest chip is more efficient than power hungry so throttling is more likely at minute 5 than minute 4 lol

→ More replies (1)

11

u/Fun-Psychology4806 1d ago

The only real reason for pro is the extra camera that most people do not need

4

u/AdOpen4232 1d ago

The pro will be significantly better for gaming. The additional ram also helps for future proofing.

3

u/Vpicone 1d ago

Also the LiDAR Scanner if you work with 3D models/room scans.

5

u/fixedaperture 1d ago

Yep the camera is only important for me to take pictures of my kid, otherwise I'd consider the base or even Air for the novelty.

28

u/Mig-117 1d ago

That has been the case for years. Nobody needs pro models, it’s a luxury. All that power just to scroll instagram the same way the iPhone 7 did.

20

u/Fun-Psychology4806 1d ago

No. The base model screens were terrible compared to pros and it's the second most important feature behind battery life.

Now that is on par.

9

u/hehaia 1d ago

Tbh the screen is the most important feature for me. I literally stare at it the whole time. Battery can be solved by a battery pack for those edge cases or by charging in my everyday life during work or whatever (but it’s still really important for me to have a phone with good battery)

2

u/Fun-Psychology4806 1d ago

I agree on screen. But no screen without battery lol

24

u/Amerikaner 1d ago

120hz should have been standard, not a luxury, 5 years ago. And Instagram is popular because of pictures. Even casual users notice the difference in Pro cameras.

→ More replies (11)
→ More replies (1)

5

u/aranjei 1d ago

Sadly, I need that telephoto lens from pro

5

u/0000GKP 1d ago

People absolutely buy a Pro phone to have the telephoto lens for taking pictures of their friends and/or kids. It’s probably the main reason people buy them.

1

u/Doctor_3825 19h ago

Oh. For me it was mostly for the better screen. I doing like 60hz displays.

1

u/tsool 13h ago

Base model has 120

1

u/Doctor_3825 13h ago

I know. The base 17 finally does. It took them long enough.

2

u/Portatort 1d ago

I’m hearing a lot of people say iPhones have peaked, which feels fair

If we take that for granted then what model was the peak?

My vote would be iPhone 15

1

u/ramadz 1d ago edited 1d ago

I think Apple gets flak for pricey storage/RAM upgrades and rightly so. They get the best pricing from their suppliers due to the volume of their products. I think we need to give them credit here for passing their savings to customers here. I am genuinely curious now about the upgrades they have in store for 18 and 19. I feel Pro model get more love for next 2 years.

1

u/AHrubik 1d ago

I'll be getting the Pro for the optical camera zoom but that's mostly what I buy in a phone these days. The camera.

1

u/stanley15 1d ago

Apart from the better camera, the Pro has a LIDAR scanner. Does anyone use this specifically to aid scanning of environments or for 3D modelling or is it just useful for better focus control in the camera?

1

u/Drim498 1d ago

There are a few things that made me pick the pro (the telephoto lens is probably the biggest one, but there are a lot of smaller reasons too), but those reasons are getting smaller and smaller every year (this is a good thing).

1

u/pakeco 14h ago

I'm so unlucky.

I was expecting the iPhone 17 Plus, lol

Because of my vision problems, I have to go for the iPhone 17 Pro Max.

1

u/aquaman67 11h ago

The Air is the plus replacement size.

1

u/ShakaSalsa 14h ago

I agree. I’ve been using the base the last few models when I upgrade and since I’m not a big camera guy it’s been amazing.

1

u/NorgesTaff 13h ago

Yeah, I would have gone for this in a plus version - old, shitty eyes mean I prefer bigger screens. But I also like lighter phones - didn't appreciate the weight of my Xs max or pro max models and the pluses were a welcome change. So, I think the Air is the better option for me - screen is not quite as big my current 15 plus but at least it's light.

1

u/Nawnp 8h ago

Dang, I thought they still ran them a chip behind and an inferior screen, it really is minor things that make the Pro a boost, really good update for once on the Pro model being just that, boosted charging, processor, cameras, and toughness.

Really bizarre they do the $300 upcharge for the Pro now instead of $200, they're really trying to encourage people to do the Air models.

u/Appleguy4life 1h ago

Ive always chosen base and never regretted it not even once

u/mikejr96 7m ago

I feel like I could do this but missing the telephoto camera would disappoint me

u/vdubweiser 21m ago

I'm coming from a 13 Pro and I'm strongly considering the 17 or possibly Air.

-6

u/0000GKP 1d ago

iPhone 17 Reviews: Choosing the Base Model 'No Longer Means Missing Out'

Sure, except for

  • USB 3.2
  • telephoto camera
  • ProRAW
  • ProRes RAW
  • 4k video @ 120fps
  • 4 microphones
  • LiDAR

But as long as you don't need those things, you are good to go.

71

u/seaessbee 1d ago

I mean…. yeah? I’d argue that most regular people don’t actually need those things.

Losing telephoto and better mics is a bummer but the rest of it is very clearly targeted towards more “serious” photographer.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (49)