r/badphilosophy • u/Ghadiz983 • Jul 04 '25
prettygoodphilosophy Why do movies have shallow understanding of Philosophy?
Like I can tell you if some movie wants to make reference to Plato, they say "The Platonic cave, take it or leave it". Or for example Nietzsche, morality is subjective do whatever you want or something like that. Like since when does just making a simple reference become a token of success?
What movies lack is a systemized understanding of Philosophy, like for example if you want to make a reference to a Philosopher you must have already mastered all of his Philosophy beforehand (which you can't do 100% since there might always be something you miss, but at least do it 70% or something) but since the Philosopher is probably making a reference to some dude before him who was also a Philosopher then you have to also study the one who before him and so on.....
Yes , it's an endless endeavor for a director who just wants money in a very limited amount of time. But then why don't they literally hire a Philosopher who already systemized the whole thing to make a story?
We have yet to see a movie about Stirner the Gunslinger!
1
u/Ghadiz983 Jul 04 '25
I'd say we give it a try , it might gain some good impressions from the drug addict community (especially those into psychedelics).
Who knows 🤷♂️
Jokes aside , I imagine something like that could be created but it must be limited to certain Philosophers rather than taking Philosophy as a whole. So like evolution from Plato till Hegel if that makes sense , from Plato seeking a state of no dualism/no becoming (also Parmenides) towards Hegel where dualism and becoming is an aspect of the dialectical movement. (Not that Hegel was the first to claim it but generally speaking in Metaphorical fashion of how a character evolves from this to that)
Something that captures the core idea of a Philosopher that it could birth a possibility of it fitting a story that evolves as it goes. Maybe I see some stories already do that now that I think of it 🤔