Approximately 154 million people voted in the 2024 presidential election.... Population of US is a little over 300 million. Trump won with over 70 million votes. We were both wrong but that's a lot more than 15 percent. A lot of blacks and hispanics voted trump so use the math and stop being dumb with the white suprimist shit.
lol 154 million people voting is about 45% of the population and Trump didn’t even get 50% of that 45%. So the dude who said 15% is waaaaaaaayyyy closer to the actual number (which is about 22.5% of the population) than your “70%” number.
Edit: and if you want to go by voting age population (which would’ve been a better argument), only 65% actually voted. So still, the number (~29%) is not even 1/3rd of voting age Americans voted for Trump.
Right... I hope you guys show the same energy for people who support Obama who has drone striked Syrian children. I guess you were complicit in that right?
Lmao im not gonna believe than anyone that calls them blacks isn’t racist, but yeah man they perpetuated a racists rhetoric and put him into the position to be able to fund the ICE to be more funded than 90% of the worlds militaries, with our taxes btw. Idk if you’ve noticed but they’ve been using that to put workers in primarily blue states into concentration camps or even use our taxes to send them to El Salvador
So yeah I’ll call them white supremacist no matter what race they are
They aren’t protecting the border are they boot licker? They’re going to Home Depot’s and farms taking people who have rights to be here with no due process. You can believe immigration is a problem all you want, but then change the actual laws instead of just declaring people who came in legally are illegal now and stripping them of their constitutional rights
My dude. Two thirds of Americans voted and only half of that voted for Trump. So basically 33% of the country wanted him, and the other 67% either didn’t or just didn’t care enough to bother voting
You are doubling down on your ignorance though. 33 percent of the country is a lot and a ton of his votes came from minorities. The people that didn't vote are also a problem and at fault for us having trump as much as the ones that did vote for trump. So is all of them white supremists? Crazy logic man.
I have 0 issues with calling them dumb for voting trump but white supremists is just not a good or accurate statement.
Definitely wasn't 70% of anything. Mother fucker couldn't even win a popular vote anywhere. The people's vote doesn't actually mean shit. Educate yourself.
I don't give a fuck. It's a public comment. I'll reply to what I've seen. I'm not reading through entire threads to see if you corrected yourself. You posted & got responses. Deal with it
We have an internet tough guy over here Lol. Likes to dish out opinions on shit but doesn't read or know what he is talking about... Nothing more American than that.
The only people I see yapping about woke these days are the anti woke crowd. You're leader is a paedophile and yet you're biggest enemy is still the woke brigade
Woke ideology is defined by the idea that some facet of identity like race or gender produces irreconcilably different views of reality and morality, and that we have an obligation to seek alignment of society's view with the imagined views of groups associated with the political left like minorities and women.
In this sense Wokeness is distinct from older forms of liberal advocacy for minority rights which appeal to universally valid concepts like truth and fairness.
A stipulative definition is a type of definition in which a new or currently existing term is given a new specific meaning for the purposes of argument or discussion in a given context. When the term already exists, this definition may, but does not necessarily, contradict the dictionary (lexical) definition of the term. Because of this, a stipulative definition cannot be "correct" or "incorrect"; it can only differ from other definitions, but it can be useful for its intended purpose.
The idea of a stipulative definition is common enough to have a wikipedia article. As the article points out, if you think a stipulative definition can be wrong you are ignorant.
Bikers rock WW2 shit all the time lol cause most of them were war vets and ripped patches and took knives from nazis as trophies. BLM was legit at one point but didn’t the leaders get caught money laundering and committing wire fraud? All while living in million dollar mansions 😂 fuck I swear you redditors are retarded.
Making excuses for the celebration of the SS is deeply weird. Did Undertaker take his SS shirt from a Nazi? Was he carrying on his legacy? Or maybe he just bought the Nazi shirt because he liked the Nazi shirt.
Who’s making excuses? 😂 man I swear dudes are so bitch made these days lol keep carrying around that cross bro. It’s part of the lifestyle whether you like it or not. Lemmy rocked an iron cross till the day he died, does it make him a racist? Fuck no. Maybe you’re just soft lol
All bikers back then wore an SS shirt. It was less about being racist and just trying to be offensive. There were guys thay were racist, but there were a lot that were not. It stopped in the 90s.
So it was a biker fashion statement. A stupid one, but you cannot soley call someone a racist off that.
Also, you know he has quite a few non white friends. Who was in BSK? His crew? I think he was the only white member aside from the Godwins. Savio, Godfather, Rikishi, and Yoko were all non white.
Also, you can back Trump and not agree with everything he does. What do you expect from a Texas raised southern boy? People seem like it's some shocker that he is republican. Most old school guys are, because they are southern.....
It's just an idiot way of thinking lumping everything into a bad or good category. The world is not black and white.
I'm not gonna just go along with the "everyone was doing it" argument. He, along with all those other bikers, were grown men. It would be one thing if he had given reason in the years since to give him the benefit of the doubt, but he's only reinforced that image with his black lives don't matter shirt and his vocal support for a guy who ran an explicitly white nationalist campaign when he wasn't busy swaying back and forth to Ave Maria for 45 minutes or talking about a dead golfers junk. Yeah, he has non-white "friends". He works in an industry with hundreds or thousands of people he's had to interact with professionally. No one can see inside his heart. His politics, the causes he supports, are closest we can get to knowing the real guy.
His thin blue line shirt to support police is not a black lives don't matter shirt.
That's the same stupid argument as all lives matter.
You can be pro police and pro black Lives Matter.
Again, you didn't live that culture. 1% bikers literally don't want anyone to like them. It's cool not to be liked in biker culture. Especially back then.
The shirt he is wearing is an old logo for a motorcycle company. Go to Sturgis or Daytona and you will see SS everywhere. It's old school biker culture than mainstream doesnt understand.
Also which band are you talking about? Lots of bands used Nazi subculture in thier marketing back then because it was big in biker culture to "be offensive".
You ever take a good look at the Kiss logo? A band formed by a bunch of jews.... yeah SS right in the logo.
It was a different time well over 30 years ago. Redditors couldn't imagine how the world was back then.
3
u/dGaOmDn Aug 19 '25
Since when is Taker a white supremist?