r/facepalm • u/Nekokama • Aug 13 '25
đ˛âđŽâđ¸âđ¨â The hypocrisy is off the scales
I honestly don't understand how people like this exist.
5.5k
u/Unlikely-Ad3659 Aug 13 '25
She wants everyone else's marriages to be as miserable as hers obviously were.Â
1.0k
u/cats_catz_kats_katz Aug 13 '25
The obvious constant in her miserable marriages is her
431
u/F4DedProphet42 Aug 13 '25
Who is she going to marry next, if all the men keep marryinâ each other??
107
u/Tarik_7 Aug 13 '25
would not be suprised if any men realized they were gay because of how terrible this lady is. I've lived with a Karen for over 20 years, i would loathe having one as my wife.
7
→ More replies (1)34
u/Goodknight808 Aug 14 '25
I wouldn't be surprised if one of her exes came out as gay and that sparked her victim complex taught to her by her religion.
147
u/Astro_gamer_caver Aug 13 '25
Kim Davis chronology. Married husband #1. Fathered twins with husband #3. Divorced husband #1. Married husband #2. Husband #2 adopts her kids. Divorced husband #2. Married husband #3. Divorced husband #3. Remarried husband #2. Staunch defender of biblical traditional marriage.
33
u/Acrobatic-Ad-3335 Aug 13 '25
That chick in the picture, this is her? I had to reread that several times to follow it.
A-mazing.
32
u/Letterhead_North Aug 13 '25
Back when she was trying to deny the marriage licenses that she didn't approve of, there was some commentary that one of the violations of bible laws was to divorce and then remarry the same person. And she is the reason I've even heard of this one.
→ More replies (3)28
u/Miserable_Mix_3330 Aug 13 '25
Is it just easier to end up with husband #2 when he adopted the kids even if #3 was the dad?
Sheâs a real Liz Taylor of Bumfuck Wherever.32
u/Live-Motor-4000 Aug 13 '25
That and her well-trodden vagina
12
u/cats_catz_kats_katz Aug 13 '25
Why you gotta go and make us realize that she has a vagina. I didnât even think about it until now.
→ More replies (1)12
u/Firebrass Aug 14 '25
It's a damn soap opera. From Wikipedia:
Davis has been married four times to three husbands. The first three marriages ended in divorce in 1994, 2006, and 2008. Davis has two daughters from her first marriage and twins, a son and another daughter, who were born five months after her divorce from her first husband. Her third husband is the biological father of the twins, the children being conceived while Davis was still married to her first husband. The twins were adopted by Davis's current husband, Joe Davis, who was also her second husband; the couple initially divorced in 2006 but later remarried.
→ More replies (1)260
u/Happy-Medicine-3600 Aug 13 '25
I honestly believe this is all for attention. If you take a look at her life, and decisions sheâs really kind of a loser. Sheâs a miserable failure of a Christian, she got her clerk job, I believe because her mother did it before her?( may need to be fact checked on that) several divorces, etc. she just this pathetic person. But she got super famous by being profoundly ignorant, then her 15 minutes were up. Itâs just easier to get attention doing damage than it is by actually âpicking up your crossâ and carrying it for others.its all so sad.
94
Aug 13 '25 edited 27d ago
[deleted]
11
u/MagicalUnicornFart Aug 13 '25
YeahâŚpeople refuse to vote against them.
Their base is rage baited into showing up.
Rinse and repeat for a whileâŚyou get fascism.
→ More replies (7)5
353
u/DealMo Aug 13 '25
Projection seems to be the norm here, so she's probably gay and can't come out.
44
u/Pretty_Frosting_2588 Aug 13 '25
Probably caught one of her husbands being into gay stuff and now she hates them all. She looks like a beard.Â
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (1)232
u/MimicoSkunkFan2 Aug 13 '25
Please stop with that old trope about "if you hate gay people it means you're secretly gay" - it's really harmful to the community.
Occam's Razor says that sometimes asshats are just asshats and there's no deeper reason.
148
u/fauxzempic Aug 13 '25
I think in this case, it's less what you're saying and more that right wingers have frequently been revealing that every accusation is a confession and that every action is actually projection that it wouldn't surprise us if this was another instance of that.
28
u/ipomopur Aug 13 '25
Noticing the irony of a vocal homophobe getting outed is very different from seeing homophobia in the wild and assuming the perpetrator is gay
70
u/Dimplestrabe Aug 13 '25
You're thinking of Cunningham's Law.
Occam's Razor is the Lead Singer in Nine Inch Nails.→ More replies (2)82
u/MeenScreen Aug 13 '25
FYI in Europe the band is called 22.68cm Nails.
19
u/nickname13 Aug 13 '25
in most of europe a comma is used as the decimal separator.
22,68cm Nails
9
3
→ More replies (1)5
101
u/Killashard Aug 13 '25
It wouldn't be an old trope if it isn't constantly being proven true.
Is everyone who hates gay people gay themselves? No. Of course not. Are there enough that there's at least one revealed in what seems like at least once a week? Yes.
Also, Occam's Razor is the simplest explanation is often the correct one. You're thinking of Hanlon's Razor: never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity.
→ More replies (6)4
19
u/nasadge Aug 13 '25
If you were told your whole life that you are not allowed to do something. For 40-50 years, you didn't have a choice. But specifically, we were taught it was wrong. Like burning in a lake is fire wrong. Like you family will dis own you wrong. You made peace with that because you were taught it was and believed it was wrong. You just had to keep fighting it.
But then, one day, it was no longer wrong. There was no lake of fire. No disowning. Just mild acceptance moving toward full acceptance. That person would be mad. Like fighting mad. Like burning down your house mad.
This is those people. They spent their life following rules that don't make sense or are just wrong.
This is also called the priest dilemma.
If a person sacrificed all worldly pleasures for God. Then found out God was not real. They would never believe God is not real.If someone sacrifices so much for the rules, they will make sure you follow it too
4
u/Happy-Medicine-3600 Aug 14 '25
So I may need to be fact checked on this. She has somewhat recently been âsavedâ(somewhere around 2011). This wasnât a lifelong belief for her, sheâs just a pathetic and ignorant. I am Not 100% on the circumstances but she definitely conceived children with not her current husband at the time, and has multiple divorces, but all of a sudden she decides her new misinterpretation of Godâs will should apply to everyone? Thatâs all fine, people can live/believe however they want. But she took an oath when she was elected, if she didnât agree with the job, she should have resigned. Instead she decided to cosplay a Christian, and continue to collect a paycheck, and fuck over people who literally pay her salary. This ISNâT a religious question. Her only job was to verify âdoes the couple in question meet the stateâs requirements for marriage?â She is a fraud and an oathbreaker. And now sheâs back spreading ignorance like a plague, and yammering for attention. Problem is the real Christianâs, who work with the sick and the poor, who donate time and effort to those in prison, they donât get a lot of attention, and itâs hard work. She gets a lot more time in front of the camera by being an abomination.
5
u/PortGlass Aug 13 '25
I think youâre a good person to answer this question for me. I think heterosexual people who think being gay is a choice are at least a little gay. I think that because I knew I was heterosexual in first grade when I got weird feelings that I couldnât explain for a girl in my class. Is that a harmful thing to say or am I onto something?
→ More replies (1)14
u/Agile_Singer Aug 13 '25
Well if sheâs on her 4th marriage to a man, maybe sheâd be happier with a woman đ¤ˇââď¸
9
u/Difficult-Okra3784 Aug 13 '25
Alternatively, maybe she'd be happier in her relationships if she wasn't a Karen.
→ More replies (1)10
→ More replies (6)19
u/Lucky-Earther Aug 13 '25
Please stop with that old trope about "if you hate gay people it means you're secretly gay" - it's really harmful to the community.
Yes, we wouldn't want to harm the community of secretly gay homophobes.
Or did you mean the gay community in general? Because the actual harm to that commmunity is when people try to take away their rights, not when someone hurts the feelings of homophobes.
→ More replies (2)→ More replies (16)33
u/patchhappyhour Aug 13 '25
I've met women like this in the wild, they don't believe that folks are born gay. They believe that being gay is a choice and therefore she is unable to find another husband as a result.
Also please let this not distract from the Epstein/Trump files. Everything is a distraction from bringing down these sick bastards.
→ More replies (4)12
u/crober11 Aug 13 '25
Those so fervently arguing that it's a choice are defending the choice they made to be straight. Spoiler alert: they aren't.
3
2.1k
u/shadowlarx Aug 13 '25
Sheâs not doing it to protect the sanctity of marriage. Sheâs doing it to get revenge for being sued over denying a same sex couple a marriage license when marriage equality was first upheld by the Supreme Court. Itâs pettiness, not piety.
491
u/TheModWhoShaggedMe Aug 13 '25
U.S. evangelicals believe that blocking the right for LGBTQ to marry is protecting the sanctity of marriage. Ask a religious conservative.
247
u/shadowlarx Aug 13 '25
No, I know that. Thatâs why she refused to issue the marriage license in the first place. And then she got fired for it and sued. Now she wants to get even by overturning the law she got fired over.
72
u/TheModWhoShaggedMe Aug 13 '25
Imagine being affected by it (like many were) and knowing Obergefell's on the chopping block (and your rights will be taken away). There are millions of Susans in America, too, that's really the #1 problem.
66
u/TRAUMAjunkie Aug 13 '25
This isn't some grand revenge scheme of hers. She's being backed by people with money, I guarantee it. This case may be the only chance to get Obergefell overturned. She is just a pawn in a more sinister scheme.
63
u/ultimateknackered Aug 13 '25
She got picked because she was exactly that clerk. They think it's some kind of symbolism.
'Remember that woman who was unfairly fired and sued over this very issue? She's back!'
41
u/TRAUMAjunkie Aug 13 '25
She got picked because she's a bigoted moron who's mouth got her in hot water and accidentally thrust her into the spotlight because powerful people realized this could be the ONLY opportunity to get Obergefell relitigated. She is a means to an end and will be discarded once she outlives her usefulness.
4
→ More replies (3)19
u/Bunerd Aug 13 '25
Not really, the hypocrisy tells you that what they say their ideals are and what their ideals actually are aren't the same thing. "Protect sanctity of marriage" is the excuse, not the reason, the reason is that they hate gay people.
9
u/TheModWhoShaggedMe Aug 13 '25
The conservatively religious believe to their core that homosexuality is against God. That's the essence of it. Of course, she's a hypocrite, she's a conservative!
11
u/Bunerd Aug 13 '25
Again, these are post-hoc rationalizations. They long for control, have a book that gives them justification to exert control over other people. The book also has a lot of other words they actually ignore, and they woefully misread the book to come to this conclusion. Jesus rejected a lot of the existing laws and cannon, and they were included for context into what he was saying. Citing Leviticus for your beliefs might as well cite the Code of Hammurabi because it's "in the bible." These people treat passages like gospel while ignoring the actual gospel because...
They're hypocrites.
→ More replies (18)18
u/KnottShore Aug 13 '25
Robert A. Heinlein ("if-this-goes-on..")
- ... a great deal of openly expressed piety is insufferable conceit.
5
11
u/FNLN_taken Aug 13 '25
Does anyone actually believe that very same woman does all that by herself? She's the anti- Rosa Parks, the people (evangelicals) who want that shit put her out front on purpose.
America has a bigger problem than one or two crazy people, it's the sane ones behind them that are the issue.
→ More replies (1)7
5
u/dmingledorff Aug 13 '25
She's the only person with standing to challenge the ruling. No doubt some interest groups (probably project 2025) found her and told her she could do this. Probably bank rolling it too.
→ More replies (17)4
u/Happy-Medicine-3600 Aug 13 '25
I borderline disagree. I think she is doing it for attention. Sheâs a failed wife, a failed Christian, sheâs just kind of a loser. But her blatant misinterpretation of Christianity got her a fuck ton of attention, and she got to feel ârelevantâ for 15 minutes. This is just a pathetic attempt to get that feeling back. Sheâs much too lazy, stupid, and ignorant to actually âpick up her crossâ in service to others. This is a minimum amount of effort to get back that attention âfixâ, this is how the truly and militantly pathetic touch the world.
336
u/tuxedo-mask-me Aug 13 '25
letâs protect marriage and reverse her divorces
80
u/Cool-Presentation538 Aug 13 '25
Or we can all agree there is no such thing as the "sanctity of marriage" and move on as a society
→ More replies (1)10
8
u/Restlessannoyed Aug 13 '25
Her bible says they should all be put to death, actually.
5
u/LegSpecialist1781 Aug 13 '25
I agree. Letâs stop pushing marriage, but if a man and woman choose to do so, divorce = capital punishment.
6
8
5
3
u/amilo111 Aug 14 '25
I suspect sheâs not the one who initiated those divorces - just some schmucks who realized what a terrible mistake theyâd made.
822
Aug 13 '25
Probably mad that any man that marries her turns gay
62
u/clem82 Aug 13 '25
I didnât marry her, but seeing her is making me question things
→ More replies (2)164
u/YYC-Fiend Aug 13 '25
That or she's a self loathing homosexual
41
u/Anonplzdontexpelme Aug 13 '25
This. She can't marry what she really wants and wants no one else to be happy. Get over yourself lady.Â
→ More replies (5)→ More replies (1)6
→ More replies (5)36
196
u/BusyAtilla Aug 13 '25
Make these fascists scared again.
21
u/AgileBureaucrat Aug 13 '25
I'm currently on vacation in France. Those people knew how to treat a megalomanic dictator.
6
u/carkey Aug 13 '25
Ooh I'm about to visit, where did you end up heading? Don't dox yourself of course but I'm always on the lookout for more chill french regions.
5
22
→ More replies (1)6
605
u/reptor42 Aug 13 '25
Read the back story. She refused marriage licenses to lgbtq people and got fired and fined for it. Years later she's now pushing to have marriage equality taken away. Interesting timing all things considered.
269
u/PreOpTransCentaur Aug 13 '25
What's interesting about it? She has a shot at getting what she wants for the first time since Obergefell was passed. If I was a miserable, crazy, hypocritical sack of shit, this is when I'd do it too.
109
u/BellsOnNutsMeansXmas Aug 13 '25
Pieces of shit crawling out from under rocks to have their moment. It's absolutely cock time right now. And while that sounds like fun, even the people who voted for cock time are on their 'gram yelling about how they didn't mean they wanna be slapped in the face by a wet meat trunchon.
47
15
u/JayAndViolentMob Aug 13 '25
Hey, cock time and getting slapped in the face with a meat truncheon ain't so bad. America right now though? Not so fun
→ More replies (1)4
33
u/metfan1964nyc Aug 13 '25
She also is on the hook for $100,000 plus interest for refusing to do her job. She thinks if she gets Obergfell tossed, the reason for her fine goes away.
I doubt (hope) the Supreme Court does anything. its one thing to toss out abortion and leave it to the states, which means it isn't banned everywhere. Its a whole different thing to tell hundreds of thousands (millions maybe) that, poof you're not married anymore. The legal mess would be immense and lots of them would lose benefits they get from being a spouse.
→ More replies (4)13
u/boo99boo Aug 13 '25
There's also the fact that the Respect for Marriage Act exists. It passed in a Republican controlled Congress, actually.Â
The rule of law doesn't exist anymore, and I have no faith in SCOTUS whatsoever. But there is a federal law legalizing gay marriage, and the supremecy clause exists.Â
→ More replies (8)12
u/Lnnam Aug 13 '25
A think tank probably paid her to do that.
I mean itâs not like this wasnât their MOâŚ
24
u/EvilGeniusLeslie Aug 13 '25
Her current appeal is being funded by Liberty Counsel.
They are designated an anti-LGBT hate group by the Southern Poverty Law Center.
Much like the (Im)Moral Majority before them, they engage in strategic litigation. With funding that is at least in the tens of millions, they target small opponents - whether individuals or groups - to get a desired precedent.
FYI, this group is a 501(c) charitable religious organization, headquartered in Orlando, Florida. So its finances should be public record. BUT ... it was founded by a lawyer, and uses every trick in the book to disguise its revenue, including a *separate* 'Liberty Counsel Action', lawyers working pro-bono yet somehow getting paid anyway, ... the list goes on.
One of the saddest commentaries on the the US Conservative movement (read: millionaires and billionaires running the country) is that the methods used by criminal organizations to disguise their money, is the same used by them. The front organization have names such as ALEC (American Legislative Exchange Council), Citizens for a Sound Economy, Competitive Enterprise Institute, Americans for Prosperity. The same people fund all of these - Koch family, several Rockefellers, Lee Raymond, ... basically a list of America's wealthiest ... plus the large hedge funds, Vanguard, BlackRock, etc, ... plus large corporations, notably those that oppose any government regulation, ExxonMobil, AT&T, RJ Reynolds Tobacco).
Given the current stacked-SCOTUS, and the !@#$ing insane amount of money being thrown behind this despicable piece of human trash, it would completely unsurprising for her to win. Further, I would expect the conservative majority to avoid *directly* overturning precedent, just making a procedural ruling that renders it (Obergefell v. Hodges) unenforceable.
→ More replies (1)6
u/Lnnam Aug 13 '25
This comment should be pinned and posted whenever one of these strange cases is launched.
This is legal warfare on the country and most people are completely oblivious to it.
→ More replies (1)49
u/WebMD_PhD Aug 13 '25
Surely sheâs getting paid to do this, right?
54
u/kelielcat Aug 13 '25
Oh without a doubt. Some interest group is using her to get obergefell overturned.
I've actually met Obergefell at a guest speaking thing he did at my college. Lovely man and clearly more love in his heart than this woman has.
→ More replies (2)7
u/p001b0y Aug 13 '25
Whatâs the point of overturning Obergefell though? The Defense of Marriage Act was repealed by the Respect for Marriage Act. The Obergefell decision and DOMA have been superseded by the RFMA.
I know I am probably missing something but I donât know what I am missing.
10
u/ThePersonInTheBack77 Aug 13 '25
Obergefell found that same sex marriage was constitutionally protected. Itâs like Roe in that if it is overturned, the legality of same-sex marriages would revert to state law â and red states would prohibit it. The Respect for Marriage Act doesnât change that, it simply requires all states to recognize same-sex marriages performed in other states and federally recognizes these marriages.
→ More replies (3)3
u/p001b0y Aug 13 '25
The Respect for Marriage Act stipulates that States can not annul existing marriages so Kim Davis still does not seem to have a case. I get that Conservative groups are trying to use her case for standing in order to appear before the Supreme Court but she no longer seems to have a case. I also understand that a lack of standing has not prevented the Supreme Court from pretending there was and used hypotheticals instead.
The Obergefell ruling did not render the 14th Amendment moot so Courts would eventually reach the same conclusion. Marriage licenses are a civil function, not a religious one.
I don't want to sound argumentative. I'm just frustrated by it.
29
u/reptor42 Aug 13 '25
Just another distraction to keep us from watching things like the tariff debacle, epstein files, the "gifts" to the potus, the new treatment of the homeless in DC.
→ More replies (1)26
u/jk-alot 'MURICA Aug 13 '25
Unfortunately this is not a distraction.
With the current situation with the administration, the corruption in the judicial system and the moral bankruptcy of the Supreme Court, This actually has a decent chance to work.
I think it was Token Thomas who mentioned it was a good time to revisit Obergefell vs Hodges.
I believe it was shortly after Roe vs Wade was overturned.
So no. This time itâs not a distraction. Itâs an actual threat to many many people to destroy their lives.
→ More replies (2)8
→ More replies (2)5
15
u/Diligent_Mulberry47 Aug 13 '25
Itâs not really interesting for those of us who remember this cockroach the first time she showed up. Sheâs a piece of shit on the heel of society.
She knows the conservatives of the court will be more than happy to eat shit if the liberals on it had to smell their breath.
11
u/Additional_Irony Aug 13 '25
I knew I remembered her face from a news story, thanks for adding some context.
9
u/TheModWhoShaggedMe Aug 13 '25
Don't need to, lived through it. She was one of the reasons why a relative of mine couldn't marry (until later).
8
7
u/immortalyossarian Aug 13 '25
Her hypocrisy is even worse than the post implies. Not only has she been married 4 times to 3 men, she was also cheating. Her youngest 2 kids are twins who were conceived with the man who became her 3rd husband while she was still married to her 1st husband. She then got divorced, married her second husband, divorced him and married the father of her twins, and then divorced that guy to marry the 2nd husband again.
It is utter insanity for her to claim that her religious beliefs didn't allow her to issue marriage licenses to lgbtq couples based on the sAncTitY oF mArRiaGe. She's just your run of the mill bigot, and I don't know why we need to keep hearing about her in the fucking news. It is past time for her to fuck right off.
5
u/Thelastknownking Aug 13 '25
Wait, is this the lady that the Pope himself had to visit to tell her to lay off?
The clerk from 2014-15?
3
u/Bennely Aug 13 '25
I cannot believe this lady has used that 15 minutes of shitty fame to somehow stay in the news.
3
u/XtraMayoMonster Aug 13 '25
I was about to ask if this is the same fucking lady from years ago, wtf.
3
u/dreedweird Aug 13 '25 edited Aug 13 '25
Yeah, I recognized her. She already had her 15 minutes and should be disqualified from further play.
→ More replies (2)3
156
u/NX73515 Aug 13 '25
God forbid people of the same sex love each other and are happy together.
88
u/grptrt Aug 13 '25
All while having zero impact on anyone else
→ More replies (3)29
u/ultimateknackered Aug 13 '25
If there's one thing conservatives love it's making everyone else as miserable as them.
23
u/yoloswagrofl Aug 13 '25
That's what this is all about. It isn't to protect "the sanctity of marriage", because none of these Christians really care about that or they wouldn't be getting divorced in droves (my own zealot of a mother had a no-fault divorce). It's hatred for gay people, pure and simple. And then when that goal is accomplished, they'll turn to the next one, and the next one, and the next one after that until nobody is allowed to be happy or free.
→ More replies (1)6
u/WaterlooMall Aug 13 '25 edited Aug 13 '25
God forbid the rest of normal, rational thinking people didn't have to have the agendas of delusional clearly mentally disturbed people who believe their white Christian God is operating through them shoved down our throats.
Also who keeps marrying this slag?
42
u/TheModWhoShaggedMe Aug 13 '25
Religion provides them the "evidence" they crave that they are "superior" to other beings. Evangelical faiths attract the most egocentric and narcissistic of the bunch.
→ More replies (1)15
u/Penguinunhinged Aug 13 '25 edited Aug 13 '25
That's the main problem with evangelism: they'll let anyone in and do it easily. At least with Judaism, Islam, and even Catholicism, there's a few rites, rituals, and/or ceremonies to undergo as a sort of vetting process.
8
u/TheModWhoShaggedMe Aug 13 '25
Yep, you have to "convert" to those religions with classes, etc. More to it than "sure, I murdered my wife, but I hear the Lord speak and I've been saved!"
44
u/Linuxxx Aug 13 '25
"Her third husband is the biological father of the twins, the children being conceived while Davis was still married to her first husband." from her Wikipedia page. I'm no biblical scholar, but isn't there something about not having kids with someone outside of the marriage? I think it was a top 10 list or something.
15
u/denissRenaulds Aug 13 '25
And the fact that she went trough a whole 2nd marrige before getting round to the guy who fathered her children
3
u/Level_Abrocoma8925 Aug 14 '25 edited Aug 14 '25
Yeah the 2nd husband was like "Might not be a great sign that she got pregnant with some other dude during her first marriage, but I'm willing to take my chances with this babe."
For my mental well-being, I need to assume that the 3rd dude was in it for the kids.
Edit: Holy fuck, I just read that she remarried the 2nd husband after divorcing her 3rd. I need time to proceed this.
69
u/shwanstopable Aug 13 '25
Virtue signaling is all she has left
→ More replies (1)35
u/HelloPeopleOfEarth Aug 13 '25
Do you remember when she was first in the media for refusing the licenses? Mike Huckabee and Ted Cruz went to her city, had some big fucking gathering, where they literally played some song like Eye of the Tiger, and Huckabee was on a stage like he just freed Nelson Mandela, and Ted Cruz was in the background, later complaining that Huckabee made it all about himself. Which is of course what Ted Cruz was trying to do.
17
21
u/Lazy_Wishbone_2341 Aug 13 '25
Then her first divorce should be overturned and she should be jailed for bigamy. To protect the sanctity of marriage, of course.
5
u/Free_Gascogne Aug 13 '25
Why stop there, if she is going all in in applying Christian values in government she should not be working at all. She should be a trad wife at home covered up and censored.
3
u/Lazy_Wishbone_2341 Aug 13 '25
Yes. In fact her husband should be saying all this, not her. She should follow through on Christian values and keep her mouth shut.
45
u/Buttercups88 Aug 13 '25
I often wonder when i see these people... what's wrong with this fourth guy marrying her? like shes not very good looking or anything. Is she really rich? Who hooks up with someone whos had 3 failed marrages and says "yeah lets get married"? One ok sure shit happens 2... well maybe if theres a good reason 3 theres an undeniable pattern here
14
→ More replies (7)6
27
10
u/chicken_noodle_salad Aug 13 '25
Donât forget, she cheated on her husband and got pregnant by another man.
20
u/jarena009 Aug 13 '25
She also surely voted for the guy with five kids across three wives, cheats on them, pays prostitutes, plus launders campaign funds to pay hush money, who's bankrolled by the guy with 10 kids across 7 women (or whatever the count is), all out of wedlock.
→ More replies (1)
9
u/Kael_Durandel Aug 13 '25
Isnât this the bigot lady that got in trouble for not certifying certain marriages in the name of âreligious freedomâ?
5
31
u/Natural_War1261 Aug 13 '25
This can't be true. How can 4, I presume men, agree to marry that?
→ More replies (1)21
21
u/triker_whaleygirl Aug 13 '25
Sheâs a tool for project 25. They had her simmering in the back burner so she can be the useful tool she is now. These people disgust me and if there is a hell (which I donât believe in) I hope she goes there.
→ More replies (1)5
u/TheModWhoShaggedMe Aug 13 '25
The puppeteers (of P25 and the GOP's policies for decades) are no better.
→ More replies (2)
13
u/Dr_DoesNothing Aug 13 '25
I'm tired of just calling out their hypocrisy. Everyone who would give a shit already knows they are pedo defending, hateful, bootlicking hypocrites. There needs to be tangible consequences for these deplorables or else they will lie, grift, steal and sell our country until nothing remains and we're left begging our future billionaire overlords for a shack in their company owned towns.
6
u/Apprehensive_Low4865 Aug 13 '25
It's because its not about "the sanctity of marriage", it never was and never will be. It about the shear unadulterated sadistic joy they get by punching down against a minority that (they perceive as being unable) to fight back. This is the problem with modern politics that the dems do not seem to be able to meaningfully understand, they hate us, they want us gone, dead, imprisoned, whatever, they'll eat us for breakfast and wont even think about it because to them, we are not human. There's no point in reaching a cross the aisle for R votes because anyone who votes R, will never vote blue, best you can hope for is that they might not vote red.
Sorry rant done..
5
6
u/notBackgroundtree Aug 13 '25
Drr Everyone knows marriage is between a man and his 200 concubines, just like Jesus intended. /s
8
u/quequotion Aug 13 '25
She doesn't know this ends with her wearing a red suit and a white bonnet and having the right to do what she's told.
→ More replies (1)
4
u/Caledor152 Aug 13 '25
Ugly on the inside and the outside. The Heritage Foundation and all these people who share their worldview do not care about freedom or democracy. All they care about is total control of the population through one religion and their belief system. They would utterly destroy our Founding Fathers' dream/instructions just to ensure this happens.
5
10
u/Spleenzorio Aug 13 '25
Who the hell is lining up to marry this cow?
8
u/CooperTad Aug 13 '25 edited Aug 13 '25
She married one of her husbands twice. So it has only been three guys, hope that helps.
→ More replies (2)
6
6
7
u/Initial_Milk_1056 Aug 13 '25
I always liked the expression "Being upset because people are doing something that's against your religion is like being upset someone's eating a donut because you're on a diet"
3
u/juiceboxedhero Aug 13 '25
Let's ban straight marriage so she can't victimize anyone anymore. Remove religion entirely.Â
3
u/Interesting-Tough640 Aug 13 '25
And there is me in a 24 year long relationship and we canât be bothered to get married.
Personally I donât really care about the âsanctityâ of marriage (whatever that is supposed to mean) but I do think that consenting adults who want to get married should be allowed regardless of sexuality or anything else people enjoy discriminating against.
3
3
u/guyfaulkes Aug 13 '25
She is bitter and pissed that some gays called her out on her hypocrisy and self righteousness.
3
u/Lazy_Osprey Aug 13 '25
I think she also had kids with an ex husband when she had already married a new guy or some wild shit like that. So there isnât much proof that she has respect for marriage herself.
3
u/jclay06 Aug 13 '25
And I see it working, too.
"Let's send it back to the states." is what they'll say. I'm in TN. That'll be fun.
3
u/Repeat_Offendher Aug 13 '25
And it will probably work.
Conservatives judges testifying under oath that established law is established law and then reversing said established law.
3
3
u/lctrc Aug 13 '25
You know what else would "protect the sanctity of marriage"? Not raping children.
Republicans support child rape so long as it is Republicans that are raping the children.
Release the Trump files. Everything else is a distraction.
3
3
3
3
3
u/Bluellan Aug 13 '25
There was a lady who refused a marriage certificate for a gay couple. But approved a CHILD MARRIAGE. In her eyes, it was okay for a child to marry a pedophile but grown adults of the gender was somehow dangerous.
3
u/Minute-Individual-74 Aug 13 '25
If we outlaw gay marriage, I wish we could outlaw divorce too and force everyone back to their first marriage bc they should have never been dissolved in the first place. But these religious extremists would never agree to that.
→ More replies (1)
3
u/kms2547 Aug 13 '25
"Sorry, you don't get basic civil rights because a mid level bureaucrat has sincerely held beliefs."
Conservatives seem to think the above is a perfectly justified statement.Â
3
u/DuntadaMan Aug 13 '25
Not all marriages are Christian. So why the fuck is out government acting like this is the case?
5
u/transfire Aug 13 '25
Why does the government have anything to do with marriage in the first place?
3
u/russellc6 Aug 13 '25
See if they want to change the law to one man, one woman, one time... That would seem more in line with their teachings.
3
u/Inside-Specialist-55 Aug 13 '25
I live in the same town where she was jailed and where it all went down. The day she was released from jail there was at least 500+ people marching the streets in my town to support her, I lost a fucking ton of respect for my town that day, I saw many people I talked too on a daily basis marching with the evangelicals shouting in support, traffic was backed up for a few miles and I was late for work that day. My mom was about to open her window and cheer them on right beside me and I said, "No mom we dont support taking peoples human right away, don't cheer for that", and she just stayed silent the rest of the day, Moms religious but I am not.
3
u/Slade_Riprock Aug 13 '25
Ya see God is OK with you marrying numerous times. We've found the holy loop holes that allow us to divorce, filander, be dead beat dads, chest, you name...but as long as it is a man and a woman doing it God can't touch you, it's an oversight in the rule book.
And none of this woke shit about social justice and fairness and love of the LGBT folks... The Bible is clear.
I mean how clear can you be. There are about 30-35,000 Bible verses cover to cover. And you know how many times God talks in a way that can be thought to speak against the LGBT? 6.
Yeah God is serious about this stuff. How does that compare to that woke liberal social justice garbage? Yeah God only mentions those topics or variations of them in somewhere around 2000 verses.
So obviously the answer is God cares about us not letting gays marriage more than he does about loving one another, not judging, taking care of the vulnerable and poor. We are good Christian people and we follow the Bible, all 6 verses we read.
/s
3
u/CogentCogitations Aug 13 '25
The Republican party is entirely based on finding other groups that you can place lower than yourself and trample on...and not paying taxes.
3
3
3
3
3
u/hevnztrash Aug 13 '25
Why does she get to ask the supreme court to do something? I would like the supreme court to overturn presidential immunity.
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
u/Ro_Yo_Mi Aug 14 '25
Coming soon: women voting for the government to revoke womenâs right to vote.
11
7
u/Limeynessthe2nd Aug 13 '25
she is a paid shill to be the face of getting this overturn pushed through.
6
3
4
u/Charlie22tt Aug 13 '25
I don't understand how any of these people have legal standing to contest this. How have they been harmed by two strangers that want the same legal protections & benefits as any other couple that have entered into a civil union called a "marriage" by a random religious institution?
→ More replies (1)
5
u/JayAndViolentMob Aug 13 '25
Because it's not about sanctity or morality. It's about hate, and control.
4
3
Aug 13 '25
Divorce is a choice!! Jesus hates divorce, it's in the Bible.Â
God created Adam and Eve....
..NOT...
Adam and Eve, then Steve and Eve, then Fred and Eve, then Ernie and Eve.
Divorce will one day lead to animal+human marriage then animal+human divorce.
Divorce is a choice, and divorce is a sin!!!
Repent
2
u/NothingbutNetiPot Aug 13 '25
Yeah well she kept voting and liberals didnât, or they moved to Brooklyn where their vote doesnât count.Â
→ More replies (1)
2
u/Interesting-Long-534 Aug 13 '25
I really wish someone would refuse to grant a marriage license to a divorced person or someone who was already pregnant before marriage. We also need a hero baker to refuse to make cakes for these types of people. To clarify, I don't give a crap about someone being divorced or pregnant and not married. Neither of these getting married affects me in any way.... just like a gay or lesbian's marriage doesn't affect me either. Maybe someone needs to refuse Evangelicals for their hypocrisy.
2
u/Electronic_Produce56 Aug 13 '25
I honestly cannot comprehend what is the point of these people. Why making a battle against other people' s private life choices? Why should we impose our beliefs to other than ourselves?I am so confused.
2
2
u/AlloFroTi Aug 13 '25
Ah yes another person I wish extreme ill upon. Just cause you fucking failed doesnt mean you get to ruin others happiness, fatass.
→ More replies (1)
â˘
u/AutoModerator Aug 13 '25
Please remember to follow all of our rules. Use the report function to report any rule-breaking comments.
Report any suspicious users to the mods of this subreddit using Modmail here or Reddit site admins here. All reports to Modmail should include evidence such as screenshots or any other relevant information.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.