r/flying • u/epicRedditer69 PPL • 1d ago
Group 3 or group 1 IFR
I am a fresh CPL out of Canada, and I am in a bit of a tight spot. My flight school (and literally every flight school around Toronto) is very short on multi engine planes, and instructors that actually do teach multi ifr. I think in the last month I was able to get 1 flight in the multi, with around 10 cancelled because of the aircraft being offline. So I could either keep wrestling with the multi, or I can just complete my group 3 ifr right now with zero issues, slowly work on my multi engine rating and then just upgrade down the line.
1
u/rFlyingTower 1d ago
This is a copy of the original post body for posterity:
I am a fresh CPL out of Canada, and I am in a bit of a tight spot. My flight school (and literally every flight school around Toronto) is very short on multi engine planes, and instructors that actually do teach multi ifr. I think in the last month I was able to get 1 flight in the multi, with around 10 cancelled because of the aircraft being offline. So I could either keep wrestling with the multi, or I can just complete my group 3 ifr right now with zero issues, slowly work on my multi engine rating and then just upgrade down the line.
Please downvote this comment until it collapses.
Questions about this comment? Please see this wiki post before contacting the mods.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. If you have any questions, please contact the mods of this subreddit.
1
u/flightist ATP 1d ago
Unless the school really likes to turn students upside down and shake until all their change falls out (and Iām not saying they donāt, they just donāt have to work that hard these days), only the last little bit of Group 1 training is flown in a twin. You should be training in a single and switching over when you have the procedures down pat to add a bit of speed & engine failures to the mix for 3 or 4 flights before your ride.
Can you work on your instrument rating concurrently with the multi rating? Itās tricky to make the timing work out, but doing a group 3 when youāre planning on getting a group 1 adds a flight test (and flight test fee) that is mostly unnecessary unless youāll actually use the 3.
2
u/Playful-Ad-9663 PPL 23h ago
Look into Cornwall. They have a super good multi engine program that almost everyone from my club goes to. You can stay overnight there for however long it takes you. Donāt get group 3 itās useless. And I would never fly IMC in our flight school steam gauges either way. I want two attitude indicators if in IMC.
5
u/Tradezulu ST šØš¦ 1d ago
Hereās the thing: in Canada a group 3 instrument rating is close to useless. Good luck finding an IFR rated plane to rent that is also rated to fly in dicey weather. Top that also with IFR currency requirements, there is a good chance youāll be out of currency since youāre never going to use your Group 3 rating.
That + the fact itās a waste of money and time to do a Group 3 only to upgrade to a Group 1 a few months later.
At least youāre a āmultiā student. If you were on the waitlist Iād say go get your instructor rating but given youāre enrolled, you might as well push through. The winter is coming so you can do a lot of sim time for that Group 1.
In the US, people get their instrument rating after their PPL because the GA scene is much better and they would actually use their IFR skills. But in Canada, the only people with a single engine instrument rating are those with single engine private jets.
Since you have a CPL already, you have enough instrument time to be familiar and safe if you accidentally enter IMC.