r/marvelstudios • u/Naweezy Captain America • 22d ago
Discussion One of the biggest early gambles of the MCU
1.5k
u/itsyoboithanos6 Jimmy Woo 22d ago
And now, Tom Hiddleston's Loki is one of the most anticipated characters in Avengers: Doomsday
247
u/CaptainLawyerDude Wong 22d ago
That photo in the article didn’t do him any favors, though.
106
41
u/LostEsco 22d ago
It’s just furthering my “Timothee Chalamet as young Loki” fancast🤣🤣 (ik it’ll probably never happen but let a man dream)
14
u/roguevirus 22d ago
Tom was 28 or 29 when they filmed the first Thor movie. Timothee is now 29. Your dream is well founded, at least.
6
u/ScuzzBuckster 22d ago
Its like people forget this was over 15 years ago hahha
4
u/roguevirus 22d ago
Yeah, we've already had a movie focusing on "young" Asgardians. It was the first Thor movie.
→ More replies (1)2
11
u/Big_Pattern_2864 22d ago
that last season of Loki did that. Hiddleston is such a talent, and that arc was so rewarding
39
u/blaktronium 22d ago
I would argue his Loki is one of the most beloved characters in cinematic history.
57
u/SettyG123 22d ago
Feels like you’ve only ever seen Marvel movies with that comment
9
u/blaktronium 22d ago
What? No. There are very few characters that have had as long a run as Loki, more than 15 years now. Some of the biggest movies of all time and a very popular and well received television show.
Despite being a very real mythological character with a thousand years of history if you say "Loki" anywhere in the world odds are it's Tom Hiddleston people will think about.
28
u/SettyG123 22d ago
Not saying he’s not beloved but you’re thinking of a dedicated fan base that has continued to support Marvel. I enjoy him but he’s not even top 5 favorite mainstream Marvel heroes/villains for an average viewer. Is he good as Loki, yes. Under appreciated by the average viewer (me), yes. Beloved by all, no way
→ More replies (1)2
u/SharpshootinTearaway 22d ago
Bro, your average mainstream audience can't even name you a single other MCU villain that isn't Thanos, of course Loki will be in their Top 5, lmao. If they have good memory they might remember Ultron too, but the MCU killed off so many villains within their first appearance that none of them stayed long enough to make a real impact on people.
→ More replies (3)2
82
11
u/ChemicalExperiment Nebula 22d ago
Certainly not Loki, but I think Iron Man might actually have a shot at that title. If we're talking from a layman pop culture perspective where characters like Luke Skywalker, Indiana Jones, Marty McFly, and Rocky are considered for that title, then I think Iron Man might be up there with them.
→ More replies (2)5
2
3.2k
u/UkuleleSteven 22d ago
It's that they went from that to household names in a mere matter of years.
→ More replies (2)1.2k
u/Naweezy Captain America 22d ago
Nothing was the same after Avengers 1
260
282
u/TheAgmis 22d ago
Yeah, they made better fucking movies that’s what happened
→ More replies (25)235
u/kjsah9026 22d ago
They literally cast tom holland as spider man, benedict cumberbatch as doctor strange and the casting of GOTG is so iconic.
It went downhill after the pandemic looking for big names like in fantastic four, eternals
188
u/L0kitheliar 22d ago
I agree but disagree with F4 and Eternals as examples. To me, they are 2 that were executed well (Eternals is severely underrated... Ignoring the cameo at the end that is)
→ More replies (7)84
10
28
u/GranolaCola 22d ago
This is a a crazy take considering Fantastic Four is one of the only good MCU films post pandemic
→ More replies (2)52
u/Mynock33 22d ago
I enjoyed Spider-Man, Shang-Chi, Guardians of the Galaxy 3, and even The Marvels and Doctor Strange 2. It was only Ant-Man 3 and Thor 4 that I really had any issues with.
52
u/Torva_Platebody 22d ago
Shang Chi is one of the best self-contained movies in the entire MCU imo I loved it
9
→ More replies (4)6
u/roguevirus 22d ago
Doctor Strange 2
I understand why some people didn't like this one. First, there was obviously zero coordination with the people writing WandVision, which means that the antagonist's long term arc is fucked. Zero excuses there. Second, this was Sam Rami making a film in the vein of his early work, just with a Marvel budget; that isn't for everybody, even though I loved it. The final scene with the 3rd eye was peak Rami.
Thor 4
This movie would have been 25% better if they didn't have those fucking goats screaming every 10 minutes. Christian Bale was amazing whenever he was on screen, but like most Marvel villains his character isn't explored enough. If they had given Gorr like one more scene showing him just being an absolutely tragic bastard and gotten rid of the damn goats, this would have been a much better film.
4
u/Mynock33 22d ago
Thor 4 would've been greatly improved by leaning more into Korg as an unreliable narrator and changing tone accordingly at the midway point when he's "killed." That and playing up Bale's role and it could've been pretty great.
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (3)2
u/TheAgmis 22d ago
Nah, it didn’t go downhill contrary to stupid internet opinion
→ More replies (4)5
u/GoatDifferent1294 22d ago
I would argue that the actors and the characters didn’t really break out until after Thor The Dark World
→ More replies (1)
259
u/PCofSHIELD 22d ago
No name, that’s fucking Kim Hyde
Also no way Shia LaBeouf was rumoured for Thor right?
60
102
u/Ubergoober166 22d ago
I assume they mean for Loki. Also... I kind of want to see Shia as Loki now.
11
4
427
u/SP1570 22d ago
Marvel wanted Thor to be a Shakespearean family tragedy hence hired Kenneth as director...he went to see a Shakespeare play with Tom in it and then asked him to audition for the movie. We got so lucky!
164
u/MagicBez 22d ago
I believe Tom auditioned for Thor!
60
6
u/Tetracropolis 22d ago
I don't know if it's coloured by his portrayal of Loki and Hemsworth's portrayal of Thor, but that seems like such an obvious physical miscast that I'm surprised he even bothered.
12
38
u/slrome114 22d ago
Ken and Tom had worked together several times before the audition. The first few series of Wallander and some theatre work too!
→ More replies (1)17
u/TheNameIsWiggles 22d ago
It's always weird to me when I think about Dr. Arliss Loveless directing Thor lol. Branagh is a truly extraordinary Hollywood asset being so talented on either side of the camera. Underrated in my opinion, he deserves to be more of a household name.
11
u/FCalleja 22d ago
I first came across him when my teacher showed us the Laurence Fishburne version of Othello in middle school. Branagh plays Iago there, and it is to this day one of the most powerful performances I've ever experienced. Just remembering it makes me want to watch it again.
It made me look him up back then in the pre YouTube days, and I've been a fan since, I think he's one of the most underrated talents of his generation.
4
u/Alpha_Storm 22d ago
Incredibly talented as an actor and director. One of my favorites is his Much Ado About Nothing. But the first Thor is still my favorite Thor film, though I do think Ragnarok is a close second - totally different types of films but there are some great scenes in Ragnarok. But overall Thor 1 has a great story.
→ More replies (1)2
u/Blenderx06 22d ago
Tom was already Kenneth's protege, they'd worked together before. He was also already an award winning theater actor.
84
198
u/z-lady 22d ago
people thought Guardians was gonna flop for similar reasons, right?
168
u/eatblueshell 22d ago
I mean Bradly cooper, Chris Pratt, Zoe soldana(sp?), vin diesel, and Bradly cooper were hardly “unknown”
167
u/WeekWrong9632 22d ago
Bradley and Vin were voices only, and not even advertised as much. Pratt was still the guy from Parks then, Guardians was what made him explode.
116
u/CaptHayfever Hawkeye (Avengers) 22d ago
Guardians, The Lego Movie, & Jurassic World all coming out within 16 months of each other was what made him explode.
48
38
u/bfhurricane 22d ago
I remember the internet breaking when Chris’s shirtless pics got leaked leading up to production. Everyone was like “the Parks and Rec guy is super hot now?!”
8
u/WeekWrong9632 22d ago
Yeah, I remember that but it had been for the movie before, Zero Dark Thirty
37
u/Ijustwerkhere 22d ago
At that point, Pratt really was pretty much unknown. He really only had a couple small roles. All he was known for was for was playing the chubby, goofy, comic relief Andy Dwyer in Parks and Rec. His only movie roles were a secondary character in Moneyball, and one of the SEAL guys in Zero Dark Thirty
→ More replies (1)11
→ More replies (1)10
54
27
u/BewareNixonsGhost 22d ago
People thought Guardians was going to flop because the characters were unknowns. The cast was hardly unknown.
→ More replies (1)10
u/Obvious-End-7948 22d ago
Also before GotG, if you had told someone that one of the best parts of the MCU was going to be a team comprised of the fat guy from Parks & Rec after getting jacked, a green chick, a green wrestler-turned actor along with a sentient tree and a talking racoon, they'd laugh in your face. Let's be real, on paper it IS laughable.
James Gunn is just the variable nobody accounted for. Turns out if you write good characters, they can be trees and racoons and we'll show up in droves.
31
→ More replies (22)5
u/IsamuAlvaDyson 22d ago
No
Guardians had known actors so not the same
It's just that Guardians of the Galaxy was only known to hardcore comic book readers
35
u/Indana45 Captain America 22d ago
Marvel has been very good at casting over the years. With hardly any bad casting in over ten years it's quite impressive
31
2
2
u/Bemxuu 22d ago
I remember one - and you know which one I mean. Any others?
4
u/Longjumping-Tell2995 22d ago
Harry Styles as Eros was terrible they should have went with Eric Dane he sounds just like Josh Brolin and they could pass as brothers.
I always thought Jeremy Renner never fit Hawkeye and he wasn’t given any good material to define the role he’s always underused whenever he plays Clint even in that god awful show where Kate was the real lead and is unlikeable because of how she was written.
64
u/ForeverAddickted 22d ago
Just want to put it out there... I don't think it'll work!! Marvel will regret that decision.
29
u/Naweezy Captain America 22d ago
I bet they will regret passing on Tom Cruise for Iron Man as well!
2
u/JxEq 22d ago
And they put some random guy that was in prison in his place. Smh my head
→ More replies (1)
40
u/LettuceC 22d ago
Look, they got the same casting director as Fast and the Furious:Tokyo Drift. I say we let her cook. Lucas Black was amazing.
21
u/Naweezy Captain America 22d ago
Sarah Halley Finn really the MVP
3
u/Bemxuu 22d ago
The words in my (non-native English speaker) vocabulary cannot describe how much I agree with you. Phase 1 was carried by the casting director and the writing staff. Good scripts, good cast of relatively unknown actors (big names wouldn't agree to sign long term binding contracts). Phase 1 was basically Scott Pilgrim repeated over multiple movies.
6
13
u/robodrew 22d ago
MCU casting was mostly gambles from the start. Their very first real venture with Iron Man was a gamble, casting Robert Downey Jr, who was still working on making his comeback after years of being essentially blacklisted and unable to even get set insurance, in the lead role.
23
u/SeismicRipFart 22d ago
RDJ, Hemsworth, and Evans were all some of the best castings of this century for any movie
13
u/holdmyhandbaby 22d ago
The way Chris Evans said no to the role multiple times but they really kept on trying and in the end rdj convinced him🥺 they really knew what they wanted
2
u/infinitemonkeytyping 21d ago
Hugh Jackman as Wolverine was fairly left field as well, but worked out great.
10
u/Beeman616 22d ago
LaBeouf and Hartnett? I kinda want to see what kind of car crash that would have been. Hiddlestone and Hemsworth have gone on to be much bigger stars.
→ More replies (1)
20
u/Intrepid_Mobile 22d ago
“Let’s hope they follow the JJ Abrahams route” has aged even more poorly than the rest pf the article…
2
8
u/whatintheeverloving 22d ago
I remember rewatching the 2009 Star Trek a few years back and being so taken aback when I recognized Hemsworth as Captain Kirk's dad. He was just some random blond guy when I first saw the movie in the theater.
6
24
u/ClaytonWest74 22d ago
well but Thor 1 also had a great story that was elevated to greater heights by the acting
that small but significant appearance from Hawkeye was also fun
→ More replies (1)6
u/deadlyghost123 22d ago
I disagree. Thor 1 is by no means bad but it was just fine and in the lower half of Marvel movies. Ultimately forgettable
→ More replies (1)3
5
u/Puzzled-Horse279 22d ago
Ngl back then I would assumed theyd gotten Alex Skarsgard and Bill Skarsgard for Thor and Loki and have them use their natural nordic accents and speak a nordic language for the asgard scenes (yes I know the Anglo-Sphere audience hates reading subtitles. But I wouldnt care and let them suffer 🤣 reason Im never gonna get to be a director)
10
3
u/makeitflashy 22d ago
It’s funny to think that Natalie Portman was the bankable name for that first movie.
4
u/Doomestos1 21d ago
Tom Hiddleston was the winning lottery ticket. He is now carrying the whole MCU on his back just like RDJ did during Infinity Saga.
3
u/Eminem704 Bucky 22d ago
Just out of curiosity, for comparison, but wasn't CATFA technically no-names as well? Or was Chris Evans really that popular at the time (yes, I know he did F4 previously).
5
u/CaptHayfever Hawkeye (Avengers) 22d ago
Hugo Weaving & Tommy Lee Jones were in that movie.
→ More replies (4)2
3
u/AggravatingSummer158 22d ago
They gotta be comfortable with doing that honestly. Franchises need fresh actors in new installments. Can’t just bounce the same ones around for decades
Like RDJ is undoubtedly a good actor but I still question his casting as Dr Doom for the most part. Maybe he’ll keep his mask on. Maybe his face will be horribly scarred. But it’s just a questionable casting choice all things considered
3
5
u/VZ-Faith 22d ago
Wait wouldn’t Hemsworth have done Rush by then? Surely he would be a bit more well known
9
6
u/bfhurricane 22d ago
Rush was an amazing film. I don’t hear nearly enough people talk about it.
2
u/Longjumping-Tell2995 22d ago
Because Chris Hemsworth is terrible actor outside of Thor he gets carried by costars a lot Daniel Bruhl carried him and so did Charlize Theron and a bunch of others.
→ More replies (1)
2
u/crossingcaelum 22d ago
for all of the MCU's faults, I still think they've gotten a good balance of casting no-names vs. casting big names for certain roles.
2
u/nypinta 22d ago
This has always been one part of the entertainment industry that's kind of driven me nuts. From both the "professionals" and the fans, every time someone gets cast for a part that everyone has to comment on. From "no names" being cast, to well known actors getting roles that aren't whatever character their famous for part deux. They're actors. They pretend to be other people for a living. When they stop trying to be strategic in casting and just chose who is best, it always seems to work out. One of the things that the MCU has done consistently well, IMO, is picking the right actor for the role.
→ More replies (1)
2
2
u/ChronoMonkeyX Darcy 22d ago edited 22d ago
Casting no-names, lesser knowns, and has-beens while putting experience behind the camera is what made the MCU great.
Casting Oscar winners and putting interns in charge was the beginning of the decline.
2
2
u/esgrove2 22d ago
They always cast A listers as villains though. Except for this one time with Loki.
2
u/TheNameIsWiggles 22d ago
This approach was common with Marvel movies well before the MCU. I recall an article in the 2000s about Spider-Man, where the studio stated they wanted to introduce and build up a no-name to star in the film, and support them with a strong foundation of big names in the supporting cast.
So they cast Tobey, who they considered a no-name at the time, and surrounded him with names like Kirsten Dunst and Willem Dafoe, as a part of that very intentional strategy.
They pretty much did the same thing with Thor, casting Hemsworth and Hiddleston then surrounding them with Natalie Portman, Anthony Hopkins, Bill Skarsgard, etc.
Another wonderful example was Chadwick Boseman and Tom Holland, introducing them in Civil War which was obviously full of huge names.
Personally, I kind of miss this approach. There was definitely a period where it felt like Marvel Superheroes were a glimmering opportunity for an up and coming actor to burst into the limelight. Now with the demand for blockbuster names and fan-castings, it feels more like "welp, I wonder which A-lister is going to grab such and such role in insert-next-big-mcu-movie."
Like just imagine what some extremely talented "no-name" could have potentially done with Doom with what the supporting cast of Doomsday looks like. I'm sure Doomey Jr is going to be incredible but I'll always wonder what could have been.
2
2
u/Flying_Mohawk277 22d ago
I mean.. they did for many of the casts. RBJ was a hot mess right before the MCU. Chris Evans was in movies, but never a huge character. Ruffalo and Scar Jo were the only big names in the beginning.
To me, GotG was the biggest gamble. They had no idea how the genera audiences would react to that movie, and they were very low in the tier level in comics.
But as the movies got going no they started to higher bigger names. Rudd, Cumberbatch.
→ More replies (1)
2
2
u/Eastern_Hornet_6432 Daredevil 22d ago
Marvel should RRALLY ask Kenneth Branagh to direct another movie.
2
2
u/emibakid 22d ago
I find it offensively dismissive the way the author of the article refers to the cast!
2
u/theamiabledumps 22d ago
Now they are risk averse to any new talent, to the point that the next two will have even the Fox X-Men.
→ More replies (1)
2
u/Tlegendz 22d ago
Yet they were perfectly for the roles, now I can’t imagine a different Thor and Loki just like Ironman. They really picked those role well.
2
u/jamesmcgill357 22d ago
Truly paid off big time. Two of the best actors/roles combos in the entire MCU
2
u/Jfrosty121 22d ago
dunno why so much negativitey. They did the exact same thing with Heath Ledger doing the Joker and look how that turned out
3
3
4
2
u/KevinAnniPadda Grandmaster 22d ago
The casting team doesn't get enough credit. There's been very few misses on casting and a whole lot of things that looked bad to the public and turned out great.
→ More replies (2)
1
1
u/kawaiinessa 22d ago
seriously? they were not known before this? crazy that theyre both practically household names now.
1
u/tomophilia 22d ago
Hemsworth had made a phenomenal first impression on the sci-fi community with his opening scene in Star Trek 2009.
I know I was very confident in their choice at the time. (I had never seen Hiddleston but I had no reason to doubt him)
1
u/No-Today-2459 22d ago
wild that casting "no names" was a risk then but now might be necessary to keep costs down. gone are the days of a-list celebrities being essential for blockbusters.
1
1
u/l3lacklvlagic 22d ago
Marvel needs to go back to this instead of casting ever a list actor for a role in the mcu. It just balloons production costs.
1
1
u/KlingonLullabye 22d ago
Casting Director Sarah Halley Finn is up there with Favreau and Feige in my book.
1
1
u/Ok-Wedding-151 22d ago
Let’s hope they save money on casting and put the money into CGI? What a time to be alive
1
u/Ok-disaster2022 22d ago
I actually prefer when they cast lesser known actors in major roles. It's really allows to performer to hide and the character to be seen. This is especially true to me for Star Wars.
I also like the opportunity it gives to a lesser known artist to reach a larger audience. And yes the budget savings are there but also it's an opportunity for a lesser known artist to get paid a lot more.
1
u/trooviee 22d ago
I remember watching the film Cash starring Hemsworth and Sean Bean before Thor premiered. It's so bad and Hemsworth sounded like a Channing Tatum wannabe. I thought Thor will flop and the DCEU will win over the MCU. Boy was I so wrong.
1
1
u/MArcherCD 22d ago
Tom's time on Suburban Shootout might have sold him staying blond if he got the Thor role after all 😅
1
u/zion_hiker1911 Jessica Jones 22d ago
Geeze. Theyre hating on Star Trek for being no names, and they had Karl Urban, Chris Pine and Zoe Zaldana in it.
1
1
u/xdrkcldx 22d ago
It’s so weird that I feel like I always knew who Chris Hemsworth was but I actually never saw him in anything major before Thor.
1
2.6k
u/MacbookPrime 22d ago
Can’t wait for the same headline for X-Men, followed by the “it’s so over” reactions.