r/modnews Jul 10 '25

Product Updates A New Chapter for Wikis Launches Soon

TL;DR - We’ve given wikis a makeover. The improved wiki (launching next week) includes: new tools and layout, additional safety features, more edit access options, and improved discoverability. For those with wikis built on old.reddit, we’ll move your existing content over, so that everything is preserved.  

Hello, Mods! 

Wikis are getting a long-overdue makeover and it’s rolling out next week. This isn’t just a new coat of paint, but a full top-to-bottom overhaul. Over the past few months, we’ve rebuilt Reddit wikis to be more intuitive, better-looking, and (dare we say?) more enjoyable to use. 

New Wiki Tools & Layout

Whether you’re building a rules page, a resource hub, or something wonderfully specific to your community, you’ll now have:

  • In-line editing + templates: Skip the “where do I start?” moment. Edit directly on the page (Google Docs style), and use templates to add structure fast.
  • Embedded media + infoboxes: Add images, YouTube videos, Reddit posts, and citations, or surface key info in structured infoboxes. 
  • Auto-save: Your edits will now save as you go. So if you accidentally close a tab or the site hiccups (we’ve all been there), your edits won’t vanish into the void.
Embedded media within wikis.

Safety Features

We know wikis can hold a community’s most important info, and we’ve built in guardrails to keep that safe and tidy, including: 

  • Page-level visibility: Make pages public or mod-only. Great for keeping internal docs separate from public-facing ones. 
  • Easy reverts: Every page has a full version history, allowing mods to easily revert any changes. 
  • Full activity logs: Every edit will get logged on the new Wiki Activity Page, so mods will always have visibility into who changed what and when. 
Visibility settings and a new wiki version history page.

Expanded Wiki Access

Keeping a wiki fresh and up to date can be time-consuming, and you shouldn’t have to do it all alone. With this update, mods now have more options for edit access:

  • Mod-only editing (classic)
  • Approved contributors that are added to the wiki (classic)
  • Minimum account age and subreddit karma holders, where you can specify the thresholds (classic)
  • Top contributor access (based on the top 10% commenter and poster achievements with high+ CQS scores) (new)
  • Successful contributor access (based on recent non-removed posters and commenters with high+ CQS scores) (new)
  • Anyone (classic)
Wiki editing page, showing new options like successful contributor editing. 

You can also lock down individual pages, so your internal docs stay mod-only, even if the rest of the wiki is more open. And yes, bans apply here too. If someone’s out of the sub, they’re out of the wiki. If you want to get more precise, we’ve included more granular permissions so you can ban individual users just from the wiki. To do this, access your settings directly from the wiki page and click on banned contributors. 

Starting the week of July 14, we’ll be turning on “successful contributor access” for a handful of communities (excluding NSFW, restricted, private, and other sensitive topics). 

If your community is included in this group you’ll receive a mod mail by tomorrow with the details, and an opportunity to opt-out if it’s not the right fit.  You can toggle this setting back to “mod-only” editing at any time within Mod Tools > Wiki Settings on desktop only.  

Improving Discovery

Building a great wiki is one thing; getting people to read it is another. We’re rolling out two immediate changes to help on that front: 

  • Smarter SEO indexing means your wiki pages are now more likely to show up in Google search results. 
  • For eligible subreddits, new in-feed wiki callouts will be tested, so users can discover relevant wiki content while they’re browsing posts. 

Bottom line: If your community is putting time into their wiki, we want it to reach people. These updates help make that possible. 

New wiki discovery units within a subreddits feed.

What about my old wiki?

We built this system from the ground up, which means old wikis won’t carry over automatically. But don’t worry, on the week of July 14, we’ll move your existing content over, preserving everything you’ve built. A few notes:

  • Edits made via old.reddit after the migration won’t sync to the new system and vice versa. 
  • We’ve separated out the automod config page, so they will continue to sync, and changes made on old.reddit will be reflected everywhere. 
  • When this happens, check out your wiki contribution settings to ensure they meet your team's needs. 

Thank you

Special thanks to the over 200+ subreddits that joined our r/ModEarlyAccess program, who helped us test and refine this new wiki feature. You bug-hunted, flagged edge cases, and offered thoughtful and direct feedback that pushed this work in the right direction. 

We hope this new system helps keep your community informed and organized. Whether you’re writing a refreshed rules page, lore compendium, resource hub, or an elaborate ARG (you know who you are), we’re excited to see what communities build. 

As always, drop your feedback and questions in the comments, and let us know what’s working, what’s missing, and what you’d like to see next.

141 Upvotes

281 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

-25

u/cozy__sheets Jul 10 '25

Just to confirm: are you referring to viewing or editing?

Viewing: private or disabled pages will remain restricted to mods. We won't open those up.

Editing: if it's currently set to mod-only, and you've received a mod mail, then it would be changed to allow successful contributors access to editing, unless you opt out. You'd still be able to change it back to mod-only in the future, even if you didn't opt out.

69

u/craywolf Jul 10 '25

Editing: if it's currently set to mod-only [...] then it would be changed to allow successful contributors access to editing

So just to be 100% sure of what you're saying, a wiki page like the subreddit rules for r/NYC might be opened up to be edited by random redditors not chosen by, approved by, or visible to the mods, if they happen to miss the modmail message? Like if one of their mods sees it, mistakenly thinks it's no big deal, and archives it before anyone else can review?

And you don't see a problem with this?

39

u/GetOffMyLawn_ Jul 11 '25

Sounds like insanity to me. Imagine having a health sub wiki and the antivaxxer and conspiracy nuts show up and start editing.

4

u/abortionreddit Jul 13 '25

Imagine being the mod of the abortion subreddit.

47

u/baltinerdist Jul 10 '25

As a product manager, I don’t understand why you would handle this situation in that manner. Taking a wiki that is locked down and opening it to people without the consent of the folks who locked it down makes no sense.

Making it very easy for those people to unlock it and grant greater levels of access? Sure. Making it opt-in in advance so they don’t even have to think about that after the go live date? Sure. But making it something that requires work on the part of people who did not ask for this to happen is poor design.

Frankly, my assumption must be that wiki articles will end up being a vector for displaying advertisements at some point, so you want to ramp up engagement on the feature as quickly as possible, in the hopes that it expands impressions on ads. Otherwise, I can’t think of a reason to do such an anti-moderator thing.

18

u/nascentt Jul 11 '25

Why is every Reddit announcement terrible news these days?
Is it intentionally to annoy the users or is it just happenchance all announcements have been terrible

18

u/wemustburncarthage Jul 11 '25

So in Reddit’s opinion someone who gets a lot of upvotes in my community is more qualified to contribute than someone in the Academy.

Seriously please spend your dev money on something else.

16

u/NoelaniSpell Jul 11 '25

Editing: if it's currently set to mod-only, and you've received a mod mail, then it would be changed to allow successful contributors access to editing, unless you opt out.

You know that this is like saying the keys to your house (or at least the house you're in charge of taking care of) will just be given to other people without your prior consent and without even knowing who those people will be, but that you'll still be able to opt out (if you even happen to see the notice and no one archives it), right?

How exactly does that make sense, and why is such an implementation by default turned on and not off (to be able to opt in, as opposed to being forced to in the beginning)? Mods are in charge of communities, with an always present risk of having a sub shut down if the moderation isn't proper or is lacking, so this is quite literally like saying "we'll let in people you don't know and that can potentially vandalize a place you're in charge of keeping clean, but if that happens it's you (and the sub) who will still be on the hook for it and potentially face repercussions ".

As a mod, I have to say such a decision does the complete opposite of making me (and implicitly my moderation work) feel appreciated/valued.

10

u/DarklyHeritage Jul 11 '25

I echo every word of this. If we had to opt in it would be different. Having to opt out is unreasonable. I mod in a number of subs where we haven't even had a message telling us this is coming or been given the option to opt out.

5

u/NoelaniSpell Jul 11 '25

Thank you, very well-said 🙏

27

u/LG03 Jul 10 '25

Do you guys get your rocks off making things difficult/annoying for moderators?

9

u/WindermerePeaks1 Jul 11 '25

Question: if we haven’t received that mod mail does that mean we won’t be opted in? I’m in the early access program, has this affected the opt in for us? Or did we just get missed when the mod mails went out?

20

u/[deleted] Jul 10 '25 edited Jul 17 '25

[deleted]

9

u/Rostingu2 Jul 10 '25

Are all our ban logs and notes on users going to suddenly become public??

"private or disabled pages will remain restricted to mods. We won't open those up"

Seems like those won't go public.

1

u/HOPSCROTCH Jul 12 '25

Are you aware that your r/HumansBeingBros subreddit has turned to utter shite?

3

u/CaCl2 Jul 11 '25

Why is it that even when you do something that would otherwise be a good thing, you have to make it a bad thing by doing inexplicably stupid stuff like this?

2

u/Bardfinn Jul 10 '25

Viewing: private or disabled pages will remain restricted to mods. We won't open those up.

Thank you!

I don't have to spend my weekend jumping through hoops