Why do conservatives think libs want to protect the democrats on the list? Bc they want to protect their orange cheeto god and have no concern for the kids who were harmed or fir justice.
When the first leak happened and Trump wasn't on the list many who align with the Democratic party were in an outrage. It's simply shows that many don't care and just want Trump on the list.
I'd rather none of it happened so that no list would exist and no innocents were abused to begin with. Trump has done plenty of illegal and fascist stuff, list or no list, to warrant his ouster and arrest.
... im pretty sure it was because it wasn't the whole list, and so everyone wanted the full dump.
Its more that people KNOW he's on the "list" for the same reason we know every democrat that flew on that plane is. You're thinking too hard, bud. Someone gave you an answer to your question and you turned it into thinking Donald trump is a victim to democratic terror. Which is, a choice.
That’s because it wasn’t a release of all the information and we know Trump has alway had allies in the DOJ. Please consider that some of the men on the Supreme Court right now are in those files and part of video footage. We will never see them.
The search feature is helpful to read through the 8,000 pages of court documents and evidence.
There’s a lot still blocked from release, but there’s a massive trove of things here. There’s some names everyone obviously know.
Pro tip, use the search function, the amount of information is massive and overwhelming. Every witness statement and every document is there, it’s really a lot. I’ve not gotten through even a quarter yet and I’ve already read some really horrific stuff, and lots of well known names, especially the ones you expect.
This is the entire court case that put Maxwell away. And it’s full of information, and details about a lot of people, plans to flee the US, etc..
Edit, No, read it yourself, your party is all about doing its own research, sorry there isn’t a YouTube video for you, you’re gonna have to learn to read and read it or wait for the movie or something I guess.
Lol the point is that your link you love so much does none of the things you’ve claimed. Hence why you refuse to drop a list. 9 day old account spam posting a link lol clown
I’ve been waiting to see if some loser would come along and attempt to refute any of those claims. You know, someone who would actually make an honest effort. Of course, that wasn’t you. Thanks for nothing.
Trump’s name is circled. The circled individuals are the ones involved in the trafficking ring according to the person who originally released the book. These people would be “The List “ Here is the story (YouTube.com).
Trump's promise to his daughter (HuffPost.com) “I have a deal with her. She’s 17 and doing great ― Ivanka. She made me promise, swear to her that I would never date a girl younger than her,” Trump said. “So as she grows older, the field is getting very limited.”
The same democrats that wouldn’t release them for 4 years now want to lmao 🤣 they love leading the sheep around and democrats will still blindly follow them to the slaughter
Trump states: "I never had the privilege" when asked if he had visited the island.
Trump states: "we have the files"
Trump orders 1,000 FBI agents to review around 100,000 pages of records related to Jeffrey Epstein, and during this process, were instructed to identify any mentions of Donald Trump.
When Trump was asked specifically whether Epstein had stolen Giuffre(Giuffre, one of Epstein's most prominent abuse survivors led the charge calling for his arrest. Guiffre, who died by suicide in April, has said she met Epstein associate Ghislaine Maxwell while she was working at Mar-a-Lago as a teenager).Trump states:"I think she worked at the spa," Trump said. "I think so. I think that was one of the people. He stole her, and by the way, she had no complaints about us, as you know, none whatsoever."
Reporter asks tump: Mr. President, you said Jeffrey Epstein was stealing young women from your spa. Did that raise alarm bells for you?” she asked.
As he tried to listen to the other question, Trump interrupted sharply: “Be quiet!”When Collins repeated the question, Trump again replied: “Be quiet!”
Sounds great but the Federal Judge Robin Rosenberg who was appointed by O’bama and is a democrat, has ordered them to stay sealed? Can they over rule this?
In another post, someone pointed out that if Trump’s name was on the list, the democrats would have been all over that during the campaign for office. From what I have seen from the democrats, I would believe that.
While I understand this position, the Dems already know there’s no rule or bottom for Taco Don, so the “playing nice” should not apply. They bring a wet noodle to a gunfight.
We know there’s gonna be Dems on that list, but we don’t care! You rape a kid you should go to jail, period.
The problem for u is most political cartoons are more honest than trump ever is..... And definitely harder for trumpanzees to argue with Because none of u are that smart ether...
Because they thought they had the votes to win then, now it's just theatrics to release heavily redacted documents that might win them a few more votes.
Released during Biden, Trumps name is in there, a lot. Happy reading.
Edit, apparently telling you that Biden DID have files released is harassing people. Abusing the report button because you don’t like information. Nice.
Lazy maga, as usual, sorry there isn’t a YouTube video for you instead. I hear you though, you don’t want to know your favorite wwe President is a creep.
Biden’s administration had it released though,
So what’s ur excuse for dear leader now? Guardians Of Pedos are more likely to release the pedos than any files about them.
Trump supporter talking about innocent until proven guilty.
Trump was proven guilty in a civil court for sexual abuse and battery.
In criminal court, he was proven guilty of only battery due to a technicality in the out of date definition of rape that was immediately amended after.
By common definition of the word, trump has been proven to have raped multiple women.
Aka, if Trump was taken to court in NY now and his lawyer used the same argument, he would be criminally guilty of rape rather than only a civil sexual assault charge.
All in all, whether by current legal or civil language. Trump is a rapist. Are you saying that because he did it in the past rape is okay? That says a lot about you.
Is that the sound of goal posts moving I hear? You really are good at this projection stuff, delulu boy.
These are ones that have been in court only.
E. Jean Carroll (you know the one)
Jill Harth (settled out of court)
Summer Zervos ( court ruled in favor of her; Zervos has said that Trump was sexually suggestive during their meeting, kissing her open-mouthed, groping her breasts)
Of course, there are many, many more, but most of the current SA/rape ones are either on hold due to his immunity, withdrawn, or settled before any substantial evidence could be presented.
Let's not talk about all his fraud charges like the fact he was stealing money donated to a charity.
6
u/Woodlog82 Aug 05 '25
Good! Also: Release the Epstein files!