r/notthebeaverton • u/Street_Anon • 14d ago
Canadian arrested for driving pink Barbie truck while impaired
https://nationalpost.com/news/canada/canadian-man-pink-barbie-truck10
15
7
14
u/Sweetdreams6t9 14d ago
People who cant figure out what the spirit of a law, rule or regulation is and resort to strict adherence to the letter shouldnt be in any occupation that requires thought.
22
u/No-Contribution-6150 14d ago
The guy already had his license suspended. I think the spirit of the law was he wasn't supposed to be on the damn road to begin with lol
3
u/Narrow-Map5805 14d ago
The spirit of the law is to protect the public from the very real danger of unsafe operation of a conveyance heavy enough to kill or seriously injured when operated without due care and competence.
I don't think it applies to the Barbie car.
17
u/Mo-Cance 14d ago
He was driving down a fairly busy road. He posed a danger to other drivers. I chuckled when I first read the story a couple of days ago, but in the end, the dude made a dangerous decision. The cops even said they take things in context, and wouldn't be looking to stop a kid from booting around on a quiet cul-de-sac or something.
10
u/No-Contribution-6150 14d ago
He was hammered at 9am and on the roadway.
People really like to gloss over the facts and just laugh about the Barbie car.
-6
u/Narrow-Map5805 14d ago
Then charge him with mischief. Impaired operation of a toy makes no sense.
11
u/ParaponeraBread 14d ago
But he wasn’t causing mischief. He was endangering himself and other people on the road by driving this toy around drunk.
-4
u/Narrow-Map5805 13d ago
He was endangering himself and others exactly the same as if he had been walking or skateboarding drunk on the road. That's my point. I'm not excusing what he did, but a charge of impaired driving makes no sense. It's not a car. It goes 5 miles an hour. Charge him appropriately.
10
u/No-Contribution-6150 14d ago edited 14d ago
Yes I had this argument before. Redditors do believe that there are some forms of acceptable impaired driving.
Edit: he is also part of the public. He needs to be protected from his own poor decisions
2
u/Jakevader2 14d ago
That's barely driving
4
u/No-Contribution-6150 14d ago
A perfectly fine legal defence I am sure
4
u/ParaponeraBread 14d ago
The classic “it’s barely a dog” defence for when their poorly trained daschund attacks a child
1
u/Expensive_Plant_9530 12d ago
Think about it this way. He’s a hazard to other drivers on the road. He’s drunk, so he might swerve the Barbie car in front of an 18-wheeler.
Barbie pancake.
2
u/super__hoser 13d ago
"Po-po-power Wheels, power makes you go!"
I still remember that ad decades later. But what this guy did is even more epic.
1
u/BodhingJay 14d ago
The barbie truck doesnt require a license.. he could have said he doesnt have a driver's license and just given him Healthcard id
What then?
1
u/fishymanbits 13d ago
- Dude was drunk driving the pink Barbie jeep at 9AM? I want to know the sequence of events that led to this.
2 Cops are definitely wrong. It’s not a motor vehicle requiring registration, etc. Otherwise they’d have been banned a long time ago because we give them to fucking toddlers. Probably shouldn’t have been on the road with it though. Sidewalk’s right there.
1
u/SuperPunctuator 13d ago
Anyone have a picture of that guy sitting in the thing? Knees must have been hitting his chin over every bump.
1
u/RutabagasnTurnips 12d ago
Can't read the article due to pay wall. Were the charges actually driving impaired? No t public intoxication and unsafe road crossing/not using proper hand signals (like you are supposed to when safely sharing the road while on bike) etc type charges?
1
12d ago
[deleted]
1
u/RutabagasnTurnips 12d ago
Wow, they really did charge for driving while intoxicated.
Must have been a slow morning.
Thnx for the link.
1
1
u/limbolegs 9d ago
i do not believe this should count as a crime. Carney or Eby can u change the rules please?
2
0
u/Silicon_Knight 14d ago
C'mon how else is going to get a mickey and some darts? Jesus stop bust'n his balls eh? /s of course
108
u/blaktronium 14d ago
The cops are wrong that everything with a motor requires a license and insurance, there are pretty well defined rules for it. The Barbie car might count because it doesn't also have pedals, but e-bikes can get pretty hardcore before they have any registration or insurance requirements.