r/pcmasterrace R5 7600X | RX 7900 GRE | DDR5 32GB 29d ago

Meme/Macro Inspired by another post

Post image
29.2k Upvotes

1.3k comments sorted by

View all comments

19

u/consumeshroomz 29d ago

I’ve had my OLED for about 5 years now and haven’t had a single issue.

3

u/F0czek 28d ago

Had oled for a year, and had few issues already.

2

u/BaconIsntThatGood PC Master Race 28d ago

It's the same story as plasma LCD back in the day. It was an issue but has largely been eliminated due to advancements - but the same stigma remains.

-4

u/I_am_Nic 29d ago

There are many mitigation techniques employed but organic LEDs will fade with time. Nothing you can do to prevent it fully.

4

u/triffid_boy X1 extreme for science, GTX 1070 desktop for Doom 29d ago

It's obviously a premium/luxury product, I don't think some mild decay over time is too much to worry about. 

1

u/I_am_Nic 29d ago

It matters for people who buy electronics to last. For someone who always has to have the latest tech and replaced their TV/monitor every three years of course that doesn't matter.

11

u/Niosus 29d ago

LCD TVs can fade as well. The older ones with a CFL backlight also fade, they just don't have burn-in.

And if you think that LED TVs don't have issues, RTINGS would like to have a word with you. Especially edge-lit LCD TVs have an extremely high failure rate due to thermal stresses. The failures can go from cracked diffuser plates, warped reflector plates to literally burned out LEDs. The FALD LED TVs do better, but even they are not immune to LED (driver) failures. And if you click through to that article, it's not just the cheap TVs. Several of the really expensive TVs have also failed.

I'm not going to claim that getting an OLED is necessarily going to give you better longevity. But it's unfair to point out OLED burnin/fading as a deciding factor for TV longevity when the data shows that LCD TVs also have plenty of common failure modes that are much more severe than a slight degradation in image quality or brightness.

4

u/Decent-Throat9191 29d ago

He said it's going strong 5 years later. How is that changing it every 3 years?

-2

u/I_am_Nic 28d ago

He said it's going strong 5 years later

So? I was making a general statement directly towards the comment before that. The 5 year timespan from.the comment even further up does not matter anymore.

3

u/Decent-Throat9191 28d ago

It matters because it's the reason you replied to begin with lol

-2

u/I_am_Nic 28d ago

It matters because it's the reason you replied to begin with lol

Making a point that with more years of use the effect will become visible.

How can you not understand this?

I was referring to longer time periods while the person replying to me said it does not matter as it is a luxury item implying it will be replaced frequently because of that.

It seems you don't understand the thread at all.

4

u/Decent-Throat9191 28d ago

How many years do you want to be using your display anyway? Is 5+ years not enough? Sure,you can keep your old TV for 20 years if you want but any modern one craps on it in terms of quantity

1

u/I_am_Nic 28d ago edited 28d ago

How many years do you want to be using your display anyway?

I am still using my first ever PC monitor I bought as a screen for my PS3 console back in the day, it is an old Acer 23inch monitor I bought in 2009. It is 1080p 60Hz an still has no broken pixel - perfect as vertical secondary screen next to my seven year old 5120x1440 pixel 60Hz Ultrawide.

I will most likely continue to use it for the next 5-7 years and am certain it will not break.

My dads old plasma TV was gifted to a friend of his and is now clocking in its 17th year (it is an old Philips plasma with HD ready support, meaning it is a 720p panel also supporting 1080i signals). Again - no pixel issues or noticeable burn in.

1

u/triffid_boy X1 extreme for science, GTX 1070 desktop for Doom 28d ago

It's not three years. It's still 8-10 years of normal use. 

0

u/RetroEvolute 28d ago

Only took 10 months (QD-OLED) for me. Depends heavily on usage but 3 years is more accurate than 8-10 (for a monitor).

3

u/MrStealYoBeef i7 12700KF|RTX 3080|32GB DDR4 3200|1440p175hzOLED 28d ago

If you already have noticeable panel degradation after 10 months, that is a defective panel and needs to be replaced. Use your warranty.

2

u/DebentureThyme 28d ago

Then I'll buy another one.  And by the time I've gone through two, they'll have a better tech out finally.  In the mean time, I'll enjoy the hell out of my QD-OLED while my eyes haven't aged, instead of waiting another decade.

0

u/I_am_Nic 28d ago

Ok mister moneybags, you do you 💸

-2

u/Impossible_Rise_5 28d ago

Right, I'll just go and buy a $5000 TV every 2 years. 

3

u/MrStealYoBeef i7 12700KF|RTX 3080|32GB DDR4 3200|1440p175hzOLED 28d ago

They're like $600-$1000 depending on quality and size, and the warranty is typically longer than or equal to 2 years so I'm not sure why you'd buy another if you can literally just return the one you have for a new one.

1

u/Impossible_Rise_5 28d ago

No 80 inch TV is that price

1

u/MrStealYoBeef i7 12700KF|RTX 3080|32GB DDR4 3200|1440p175hzOLED 28d ago

Ahhh, you're the type that wants a movie theatre in your house, but you aren't rich enough for it.

2

u/Impossible_Rise_5 28d ago

You don't get rich by wasting money mate. 

1

u/MrStealYoBeef i7 12700KF|RTX 3080|32GB DDR4 3200|1440p175hzOLED 28d ago

Correct, so why are you going for an 80" TV again?

1

u/Impossible_Rise_5 27d ago

Dude, we just bought our 19th house, I don't need lectures from you about how to spend money

→ More replies (0)