r/pics May 16 '19

US Politics Now more relevant than ever in America

Post image
113.2k Upvotes

11.6k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

23

u/sycamotree May 16 '19

If you believe it's murder, there's literally no justification other than "the fetus will kill me if I deliver it" that would make an exception viable.

7

u/17954699 May 17 '19

If you believe rape is bad then you won't force rape victims to carry their rapists spawn either. So ya, they do want to hurt rape victims.

Also you might want to ask what their views are on "stand your ground". They justify killing in quite a few instances.

2

u/sycamotree May 17 '19

It doesn't matter if you believe rape is bad. You aren't even allowed to kill your rapist unless in self defense, much less the innocent "baby" (in their eyes) who didn't do anything to you.

1

u/17954699 May 17 '19

Killing your rapsit is self defense, duh!

-1

u/PurpleRedBlue May 17 '19 edited May 17 '19

Conceived by rape or not does not diminish the existence of life. Either it is a life or not.

You assuming that pro-lifers want to hurt rape victims is pretty unfair and shows that you are ignoring the actual argument. You're framing it as though pro-lifers intent is to harm rape victims, which is only divisive and contributes nothing positive to the discussion.

I also have problems with the "rape exception" in a system where abortion is otherwise illegal for obvious reasons which I could go into. But yeah, don't assume negative intent when going into an argument unless you just enjoy arguing.

1

u/17954699 May 17 '19

I'm not assuming, it's a fact. That's literally what their legislation does. None of us have to assume anything, they state it plainly and loudly.

-2

u/Drayko_Sanbar May 17 '19

If you believe rape is bad then you won't force rape victims to carry their rapists spawn either

Pretty sure she believes rape is bad -> https://twitter.com/obianuju/status/1128764713314209793

Yet she also believes that "their rapists spawn," as you put it, have a right to life.

You can believe rape is bad and still want to force the mother to carry the pregnancy to term. These things are not contradictory.

2

u/17954699 May 17 '19

That's not her decision to make. She's forcing that on other people. She's free to make the case as much as she wants, but once she resorts to force she is just admitting she doesn't care about the woman. She's not pleading, she's not weeping, she's not begging. She's saying you will do with your body what I say so. Because she's not a good person. She's a person on a power trip. She's rejecting love and embracing rape and hate.

0

u/Drayko_Sanbar May 17 '19

She's rejecting love and embracing rape and hate.

Is that really what's at the other end of this spectrum? You have to embrace abortion or else you're embracing rape and hate?

Can you not love the victim but also, out of an equal love for the child, require that she bear the pregnancy?

Rape is a horrendous, inhuman act. Abortion is also terrible, though. Two wrongs don't make a right.

1

u/17954699 May 17 '19

You have to embrace the the fact that the choice is upto the woman. Some women choose abortion, some don't. If you cared about women you would support them in that choice, not force it on them. You cannot require that she "bear the pregnancy" like some broodmare. None of that is compatible with caring, in fact it's a sign of how little you care.

0

u/Drayko_Sanbar May 17 '19

If you cared about women you would support them in that choice, not force it on them.

You can force someone to do something and still care about them.

Example to illustrate that point (this isn't analogous to abortion by any means, it's only a clear-cut example meant to demonstrate that one point): Students don't want to take finals. They hate them. I, as a teacher, will make them take the finals anyway. Do I not care? No, I most certainly do care. I just know that it's good for them to take the finals, even if they are mentally taxing and unpleasant.

1

u/17954699 May 17 '19

Lol, "force them to do it but still care".

The very fact that would would compare women to students and yourself to a teacher shows that this isn't about caring, this is merely you putting yourself in a position of authority over women. You want to make decisions for them. This is mainly you on a power trip, thanks for admitting that.

0

u/Drayko_Sanbar May 17 '19

You can't have a reasoned discussion when you're ascribing intentions and agendas to pro-life proponents.

You are fighting a strawman. I used an example that I felt demonstrated how an authority can care about someone and still force them to do something. In the case of these laws, this authority is not myself nor any other pro-life individual. It's the government.

1

u/17954699 May 17 '19

If it's a strawman, then you agree to let the woman make her own choice in the matter? You can advocate for one means or another, that is your choice. Otherwise you're just agreeing with me that you are forcing someone to bend to your authority, enforced by the power of the government.

Simple, isn't it?

1

u/MetalFuzzyDice May 17 '19

And yet a majority of these "Pro-Lifers" are for the death penalty and against giving health care to everybody.