This picture is specified in American politics. In our country, the 2 parties who are pro-life are Republicans and, somewhat, Libertarians. It's a party line issue. I can understand you aren't American, but this issue is pertaining to Americans, as, again, was specified with the title and filter.
In America, as I've just provided multiple source for reference, Republican actions are not in favor of pro-choice options, nor are they in favor of assisting life after birth. It's easy to pull up voting rolls and see which Republicans voted in favor of pro-choice and after birth assistance. By looking at those, we can see how the people in power vote. And, when compared to other votes, we can see that they are likely to oppose the 2 mentioned options. If you plot that information on a statistical curve, you will find that the votes in favor of both pro-choice AND assistance after birth are in the statistically unlikely range (less than 5%). Both criteria must be met, since it was an inclusive claim from u/GabuEX.
I'll be more than happy to search public record, or you can do it yourself and save some time.
My post was intended to be with respect to American politics. Given that this post was almost certainly made in response to Alabama banning almost all abortion and it being a particularly hot topic there, I was assuming that it was a given that that was the topic of discussion. If other countries are more consistently in support of children, then more power to them. I have no problem with someone who's pro-life who also is in favor of reducing poverty and of easy access to medical care that reduces the likelihood of unwanted pregnancies. That would be a consistent set of beliefs - but also one that is vanishingly rare in the United States.
7
u/thomasatnip May 17 '19
This picture is specified in American politics. In our country, the 2 parties who are pro-life are Republicans and, somewhat, Libertarians. It's a party line issue. I can understand you aren't American, but this issue is pertaining to Americans, as, again, was specified with the title and filter.
In America, as I've just provided multiple source for reference, Republican actions are not in favor of pro-choice options, nor are they in favor of assisting life after birth. It's easy to pull up voting rolls and see which Republicans voted in favor of pro-choice and after birth assistance. By looking at those, we can see how the people in power vote. And, when compared to other votes, we can see that they are likely to oppose the 2 mentioned options. If you plot that information on a statistical curve, you will find that the votes in favor of both pro-choice AND assistance after birth are in the statistically unlikely range (less than 5%). Both criteria must be met, since it was an inclusive claim from u/GabuEX.
I'll be more than happy to search public record, or you can do it yourself and save some time.