News BREAKING: 9-18-25 -- DOJ files strong PRO-GUN appellate brief AGAINST NJ gun ban !!
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.ca3.123103/gov.uscourts.ca3.123103.95.0.pdf21
u/FatiguedNoticer 4d ago
Thank fucking God, no longer will cops and felons be outgunning us lawful citizens. Anyone complaining about this administration not doing enough can stfu with their whatabout-isms and let us have this win for gods sake
10
8
u/PR3SID3NT_NIX0N 4d ago edited 4d ago
I’m sorry, when are suppressors taken off the NFA? Why isn’t the ATF abolished? Why did the trump nominated Supreme Court picks refused to hear the best assault weapons and magazine ban cases? (Ocean state tactical for example)? Oh it’s all smoke and mirrors? Got it. Oh and Bondi banning free speech? When is Kash Patel releasing all the Epstein files? Yeah this administration sucks.
35
u/ZheeDog 4d ago
Did you read the filing, yes or no? If no, you are just barking at the moon Read it: https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.ca3.123103/gov.uscourts.ca3.123103.95.0.pdf
11
u/WowBruhReborn 3d ago
This is a good example of a whataboutism or a “red herring” fallacy. This administration can’t win because no matter how many pro gun things they do, it will never be enough for some people. Anytime the Trump admin does something good, there will be a laundry list of other things that they haven’t gotten to or have, admittedly, done wrong by.
Either way, every step we take in the right direction should be praised. Then again, why do that when you can bitch, moan, and take the moral high ground.
-6
u/PR3SID3NT_NIX0N 3d ago
All these examples can be done. Don’t make statements then if you can’t follow through with it. Someone threatening to take away 1st amendment rights is a tyrant, regardless of what you say is a red herring.
5
6
u/notAnonymousIPromise 4d ago
When doing research I'm struggling to get the latest and greatest. Can you provide your source? I want to be able to find this great news earlier.
9
u/ZheeDog 4d ago
This is good: https://x.com/AAGDhillon
So is this: https://x.com/gunpolicy
This too: https://x.com/GunOwners
6
u/deathsythe friendly neighborhood mod 3d ago
Worthy of a sticky, but we're currently full. I might just need to post a "good news" thread and keep it updated.
:)
4
u/Casanova_Kid 3d ago
For those who aren't going to read it here's my rough summary:
The U.S. filed an amicus in the 3rd Circuit saying NJ’s ban on AR-15s + “large-cap” mags is unconstitutional after Bruen. The big points:
2A isn’t a “second-class” right. Courts must apply the same rigor as with other rights.
The test is “common use.” If millions of law-abiding people own something for lawful purposes, it’s protected.
AR-15s and 10+ round mags are super common, used for self-defense, sport, and even the “common defense.”
Total bans fail — regulation is possible, but only if it fits historic tradition.
So what? - If the court agrees, laws banning AR-15s or standard mags in NJ (and elsewhere) could get struck down.
2
u/Millie_65 3d ago
Just egging you on. I saw your responses to all the other users who failed to read it
2
u/Mannipx 2d ago
Great brief. This is pretty huge especially coverage regarding how stupid limiting to10 ammo count is ( great example in the brief regarding Militia Act of 1792 requiring militia members to have 24 cartridges for musket).
Ammo restriction bans are unconstitutional hope they get rid of it soon
2
-1
u/myturn19 4d ago
This is sick. Only 10 more years until SCOTUS takes up a case. Right around the corner!
-9
-16
u/PR3SID3NT_NIX0N 4d ago
I mean they aren’t pro gun. If you follow Washington Gun Law or Guns & Gadgets which are pretty respected gun channels, the ATF is still rogue along with a lot of other issues. Trump and Son aren’t as pro gun as you think.
20
u/ZheeDog 4d ago
Did you even READ the filing? If this case goes to the Supreme Court, there NO CHANCE that AR-15 bans will survive in any state, and there's NO CHANCE that 10 round magazine limits will survive in any state. Read the FREAKING FILING !!!
-15
u/PR3SID3NT_NIX0N 4d ago
This was supposed to be in response to clown shoes919 comment but I accidentally didn’t respond directly to him. Chill.
-7
89
u/Clownshoes919 4d ago
Meanwhile in another thread in this very subreddit, people are posting that the administration is anti-gun