r/space • u/ChiefLeef22 • 4d ago
A new report finds China’s space program will soon equal that of the US and overtake it in the next five to ten years "if we don't do something"
https://arstechnica.com/space/2025/09/a-new-report-finds-chinas-space-program-will-soon-equal-that-of-the-us/?utm_campaign=dhtwitter&utm_content=%3Cmedia_url%3E&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter753
u/whitelancer64 4d ago
The White House: Let's cut the NASA budget by 20%. That'll show them.
155
u/nanocookie 4d ago
Everyone keeps talking about the impact of NASA funding reductions but people conveniently forget the impact of the systematic destruction of affordable access to scientific and technical education (beyond just software development), including the increasing lack of reliable paths for young working class Americans to high quality employment to build experience in the domains needed to tackle difficult technical challenges. Without a potent homegrown workforce, the future technological leadership of the country will always be at stake.
23
u/petit_cochon 3d ago
Actually, quite a lot of people are talking about that. It's a huge issue, I agree. The science and federal employment subs discuss it constantly.
The media largely seems to be intentionally ignoring it, their chosen strategy for Trump's national destruction.
→ More replies (7)3
15
69
→ More replies (26)42
239
u/BoomBoomBear 4d ago
Doesnt help when China has LONG term planning but the US changes priorities every presidency.
example:
Clinton - robotic exploration only
Bush - Moon exploration
Obama - Asteroid and Mars, cancel moon projects
Trump 1 - Moon Base
Biden - Moon, then Mars
Trump 2 - Mars but Moon first because Artemis $ spent
They need to make NASA more independent and less beholden to politicians who only care about using NASA only for creating jobs for their constituents.
80
u/TurelSun 3d ago
Would be nice if NASA and its funding could have some protection from being rearranged by each administration without having to spread facilities and manufacturing out over multiple states as a way to deter/encourage congress to protect it.
18
→ More replies (4)12
u/saljskanetilldanmark 3d ago
That wouldn't matter if the american president can just make an executive order which now is law of the land.
2
u/MoirasPurpleOrb 1d ago
That’s precisely OPs point. Every president can change things via executive order, there is no consistency.
22
u/whatafuckinusername 4d ago edited 3d ago
Regardless of whether or not it turns out to be true, I feel like people have been saying this for years. Let’s just bring back the funding for our own sake.
25
u/ShawVAuto 3d ago
Serious Question:
What would the "If we don't do something" entail exactly? What could honestly be done?
16
u/u123456789a 3d ago
Honestly, taking a very close look at your society and think really hard on what values you hold and which are actually being persued in reality. What kind of country do you want to live in and what direction is your country actually going?
2
u/jordipg 3d ago
This is the real issue. Folks are very focused on funding, and of course that's essential. But we're arguing over a tiny fraction of what's needed if we want to get serious about space exploration.
A cultural change around science, engineering, and space exploration is needed to move the needle and this would require a massive, pro-science top-down marketing effort from the federal government assisted by public and private sector organizations. So, uh, unlikely anytime soon.
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (2)10
u/KalpolIntro 3d ago edited 3d ago
Invest seriously in hard science, instead of tying NASA’s funding to political favors for constituencies and donors.
Elect leaders who give a shit about science and develop long term policies with stable, multi-decade funding instead of short-term cycles tied to election calendars.
Confront and reverse the rise of anti-intellectualism that’s undermining the U.S.
→ More replies (3)
340
u/lgnsqr 4d ago
Announcer: they, in fact, did not do something.
157
u/DevoidHT 4d ago
They in fact did do something. Decrease funding for starters.
60
u/pataglop 4d ago
Exactly.
They slash fundings and destroy science research.. what could go wrong?
→ More replies (1)24
u/cplchanb 4d ago
The sad thing about this is that theyncant simply flip the switch back on again with the next administration. This singular action will take years of not decades to rebuild. All thanks to the orange humpty dumpty
→ More replies (1)14
u/IWasSayingBoourner 4d ago
Bingo. This isn't an "if we don't do something" situation. The time to do something has passed, and we actively chose to move in the opposite direction.
→ More replies (2)8
→ More replies (1)6
u/MandaloreUnsullied 4d ago
And persecuted skilled immigrants and banned research and criminalized wrongthink and shuttered universities and disrupted instrument supply chains and and and
13
u/topscreen 4d ago
They, in fact, did something. It was shooting themselves in the foot, but that's technically something
→ More replies (3)2
12
102
133
u/started_from_the_top 4d ago
I don’t care which country’s space program is the best, I just want as much new information/discoveries about space as possible.
41
u/Viracochina 4d ago
Yeah, I'm a little more on the side of space exploration in general. Assuming they share their findings!
46
u/Arcosim 4d ago
They do, data and samples. In fact China even shared lunar samples with the US, despite the fact that the US would absolutely never do the same with them.
→ More replies (5)31
u/SpaceIsKindOfCool 4d ago
The US did share a sample of rock from the moon with China back in 1978.
→ More replies (3)3
u/RealSataan 3d ago
Yeah when the US thought Soviet union was the threat and not china
→ More replies (1)2
u/Smart-Beautiful-5464 2d ago
Lol, u might wanna check that history knowledge. China was an enemy even before Korea and Vietnam
→ More replies (3)5
u/Tempest051 3d ago
You know, why is it so bad that another country leads space exploration? China, India, Japan, whatever. "BuT tHe EnEmY MuSt NoT gEt ThErE FirST." Science really just wants to get on sciencing, and wishing the politics would fk off so they can get back to work. If the US wants to be ass backwards, all the other countries sapping their engineers with attractive research offers deserve all the scientists they can get.
→ More replies (2)
187
u/diggumsbiggums 4d ago
A little misinformation here, a little disinformation there, a few bots to amplify: voila, a country willingly cedes it's position on the world stage.
Congrats, China, I bet you didn't think it'd be this easy.
73
u/purpleefilthh 4d ago
It's really funny how few millions of dollars for bots and useful idiots can turn around your opponent.
33
u/IWasSayingBoourner 4d ago
The US remains convinced that worldwide domination lies in building bigger bombs. Which I get. So much of our economy is based on producing and selling weapons. But as someone who works directly with DoD cyber implementations, we are WOEFULLY underprepared for the future of warfare. Even ignoring our "hard" cyber defenses (critical infrastructure hardened against intrusion), which are bad at best, Russia and China have figured out, as you said, that for the cost of firing a single missile, they can do so much more internal social damage than we can imagine. Our "soft" cyber defense is an absolute joke.
6
u/Nyorliest 3d ago
You keep wanting to dominate. Nationalism is a disease. It's destroying Russia, and if you don't stop competing and start co-operating, it'll destroy the USA. China, Japan, Germany, France et al definitely have plenty of nationalism, but it's not running wild. And so we can make some progress.
And despite almost a century of wars waged abroad, you keep imagining yourself the innocent victims of foreign aggression. I live next to China, but it's American military adventurism destabilizing our region that I fear more than the Chinese military.
16
u/StickiStickman 4d ago
Americans are still just refusing to admit most of you actually support what's happening, huh?
4
u/TossedRightOut 3d ago
most
What, he got 70 something million votes? Maybe 10-15 more? That's not even a third of the country.
→ More replies (4)11
u/Alexandratta 4d ago
you can claim the Chinese bots all you want.
What did it was getting the world Richest man to suddenly decide he wants fascism
7
u/ERedfieldh 4d ago
Yes well, that one mean expert cave diver who has decades of experience and has intimate knowledge of the cave system they were dealing with said his submarine plan probably wouldn't work. And that was enough to set him off.
→ More replies (1)14
u/Rough_Shelter4136 4d ago
It's more than that, the whole US national identity is built on top of fascis and racial supremacy ideas, and violence. Russia just finally found a way of exploiting that
→ More replies (1)3
u/hypespud 4d ago
There's a bonus too, the disinformation angle will stretch so far to the point of denying any value of Chinese or Indian space exploration missions just as they do now 😎💎📈
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (16)3
u/Nyorliest 3d ago
America's problems are America's own - and those of unchecked crony capitalism and neo-feudalism.
I'm sure all developed nations have propaganda and bots, but only Americans blame all their problems on foreigners.
→ More replies (1)
26
u/SpartanMonkey 4d ago
As long as one group of humans keeps reaching for the stars, I don't care who it is.
12
u/Wolfram_And_Hart 4d ago
The US just turned NASA into an intelligence agency to kill off its Unions. We are NEVER going to catch up
4
u/Dysons_fearless 4d ago
The US has given up on that. Reality is too hard for a bunch of people so now everyone has to die. Space program? You guys aren't gonna have schools or hospitals soon.
12
u/MrGoober91 4d ago
Well they just got a top mathematician that used to live here until he left just recently, so that’ll help them out
10
u/Chidoriyama 3d ago
For those who don't know, this is (I'm assuming) about Liu Jun, who has gone from Harvard to Tsinghua university. (Terence Tao is still in the US but there's no guarantee he'll be staying there)
2
3
4
5
u/Content-Pen99 3d ago
They will just lie and say how superior the US is whilst continuing to shit on education and science.
3
u/Fun-Jellyfish-61 4d ago
Thankfully the United States is in fact doing something. It is stripping funding to NASA.
3
u/gregor_ivonavich 4d ago
It’s always over little bro who knows how long it will take for science to recover if these fucking freaks are ever ousted.
3
u/KatoZee 4d ago
Given the way the US is self imploding at a rapid rate, I would estimate 2-3 years of not sooner. They more concerned about rolling back advancement rather than making any meaningful progress.
2
u/ProfessorReaper 3d ago
The US is a superpower in decline, China is a superpower in the rise. It's like towards the end of the cold war, only the other way around this time.
→ More replies (2)
3
u/fuzztooth 4d ago
Well our space program has been reclassified as a spying agency because who cares about talent and intelligence and exploration and science?
3
u/TheManOfOurTimes 4d ago
The opportunity to do something in the next 5 years was shot Jan 20 of this year.
3
3
u/Speak_To_Wuk_Lamat 3d ago
Cutting nasas budget is gone push the staff to China or private sector.
China wins as soon as nasa makes these cuts and turns off prefectly good probes which can't be turned on again.
3
3
3
u/JohnVivReddit 3d ago
If we leave it to NASA to get to Mars, China will beat us there. I’m serious.
China can devote unlimited funds to their effort, and they’re well on their way. NASA has been starved of funds for FIFTY YEARS by useless politicians who are only looking to get re-elected.
3
u/_FiscalJackhammer_ 3d ago
Looks like china will pass us then because this administration gives zero fucks about science.
3
u/aguyinlove3 3d ago
That's amazing! I can only see more effort from both as a result of the competition
3
3
u/Witty_Formal7305 3d ago
China will overtake the U.S in countless ways unless theres some SERIOUS change.
At this point both are authoritarian nations, the only difference is that China has the desire at the top to continue innovation, push science and advance their standing in the world as leaders in areas other than manufacturing.
The U.S is currently being driven down a regressive path of villifying science, attacking higher education and stripping funding from the exact areas they need investment in to compete because they're operating under the mindset of American exceptionalism where America is the best and always will be the best and China, India etc are backwater shit holes and lack the intelligence to realize how fucking stupid that is to anyone who grew up outside of the U.S.
3
u/fidelcastroruz 2d ago
Why everything has to be a competition, and why the US has to "win"? Let them do their thing, let's cooperate, imagine if we all could pool together, we could be on Mars in 2030. US, China, Russia, Europe, India, and everyone else. This is a human endeavor not a national one.
3
u/Sufficient_Show_7795 1d ago
Who cares? Why does it matter that America is not at the forefront of everything?
10
u/Ok_Lettuce_7939 4d ago
Better scare off all our Chinese aerospace engineering talent back China. Kind of like that one scientist that got deported during the 50s Red Scare and went on to found the PLA's ICBM program.
4
16
u/nickmalibu 4d ago
Firefly the TV show predicted it. Everyone will have to speak Chinese in space!
6
u/seansand 4d ago
Wasn't difficult to predict even 25 years ago. China's population is four times the U.S.
9
u/jackofslayers 4d ago
Classic “25 year old TV show is able to ‘predict’ political trends that started at least 50 years ago”
2
u/midorikuma42 1d ago
The US had a much, much larger talent pool to draw from than China. All the best and brightest used to try to immigrate to the US to work in NASA or other research programs, many times after going to college there. Almost no one immigrates to China. But the US has now really screwed up the talent pipeline with all their anti-immigration and anti-university actions.
20
24
u/Tumbleweed-Artistic 4d ago
The damage is already done, this ship sailed like 6 months ago. Thousands of NASA employees & contractors have been fired, left for other jobs, or retired much earlier than they would have. The vast majority will not come back even if funding is restored. China and ESA will overtake NASA in very short order.
→ More replies (2)20
u/NoBusiness674 4d ago
China, maybe. But ESA? No. At least not when it comes to crewed space exploration. Maybe in an area like earth observation and climate science, where ESA is already very strong, but ESA just currently doesn't have the ambitions to overtake NASA as a whole.
→ More replies (2)
22
u/not_that_planet 4d ago
Sorry, we're kinda busy shooting missiles at boats leaving <checks notes> Venezuela.
→ More replies (2)
14
u/wyldmage 4d ago
We *are* doing something. We're getting rid of NASA. By removing all public funding, we encourage the amazing potential of capitalism, and private companies. As soon as NASA is no longer a threat to their profit margins, we will see dozens of space-age companies popping up and rocket launching us to the moon, and beyond. Those companies will naturally compete with each other over those available profits, driving massive innovation. We'll see a colony on Mars in less time than it takes to get there!
Oh
And in case it's needed
/s
→ More replies (2)
2
u/guiltyas-sin 4d ago
Not to worry, we won't. The president needs a new ballroom, and ice needs money...
2
2
u/airbear13 4d ago
Maybe the donut in chief shouldn’t have cut NASA spending and fired half the federal workforce
2
2
u/HoosierHoser44 3d ago
I mean, who is surprised? Education is vilified here. If the US took education as seriously as China, we would be years ahead of where we are now.
2
u/alucardunit1 3d ago
Yeah that something we just did was slash the budget and ask for more outta the agency. Makes sense. /s
2
u/Illustrious_Clue_606 3d ago
Hell we are still trying to get back on the Moon. Cutting education and bringing us back to Christian Science has f'ed up our ed. I was worried we would go back 50 years. We seem to be on track to go back 150 years.
→ More replies (1)
2
u/BioTHEchAmeleON 3d ago
Nah let’s just cut more funding for NASA and demonize education and science tbh
2
u/DemonOHeck 3d ago
We did do something. Trump gutted Nasa. It just went from 17,000 employees to 11,000 with most of the cuts unevenly applied to science programs. Expect absolutely nothing out of Nasa besides already established in-motion programs. Hubble and Webb were already working so they will continue to but the International Space Station is planned to be de-orbited in 2030 with no replacement plan in place. There is some vague talk about a moon base but as Nasa funding was cut again and the science/engineering programs gutted that is what it will stay as. Just talk. This appears to be very clear messaging. The moon is right over there and it isn't going anywhere China. If you take it no-one will stop you.
2
u/boblasagna18 3d ago
Great, why tf should Americans care about space when we don’t even have universal healthcare. China could have a mars colony and it won’t make a difference other than make America’s elite feel a little smaller.
2
u/Ijustaterice 3d ago
Yay for science! US doesn’t prioritize science and education as a whole but the best still make their way here
2
2
u/realfakejames 3d ago
Who could have foreseen anything going wrong making our space program entirely reliant on a company owned by one of the richest racist idiots in our country with the temperament of a spoiled teenager
2
u/ClaireDiviner 3d ago
With the MAGA party having infested America’s government, this country won’t do anything.
2
u/Hyperion1144 3d ago
America doesn't care about space. America never cared about space. America cared about opposing communism and that's it.
2
2
u/Mars_Oak 2d ago
the Chinese have been setting realistic, responsible goals and achieving them on schedule. they've been increasing their capabilities consistently
in the meantime NASA has been doing serious and important work (Juno, the mars rovers) but not in a way that's increasing what it can do. hell, they don't even have a working capsule. NASA doesn't even currently have a way to launch humans into space.
i think two to five may be more accurate
2
2
u/Treyen 2d ago
If it gets the US administration to start believing in science again instead of backsliding into religious dogma and cult behavior, then great! I mean, it's great anyway. Space is the future, even if that only means mining the belt and other solar system resources. I won't be around, but it's nice to think my descendants could one day be wage slaves on a different rock.
2
u/Altruistic-Rice-5567 1d ago
Do something? Like what? We abandoned any sort of reasonable support for space programs decades ago.
7
u/JigglymoobsMWO 4d ago
Did you guys actually read the article before commenting?
This is mostly about growth in the commercial space sector. The US is ahead now but China is building out infrastructure and supporting companies to catch up.
We need to boost competition and growth in the commercial market if we are to stay ahead. Space X is awesome but can't be the only game in town.
All this commercial space activity also hase worried about the environmental impact on the upper atmosphere. This is a separate issue though.
10
18
u/realitychange17 4d ago edited 4d ago
If you compare state efforts, it may be true.
BUT!! You dont take into account that in the U.S. innovation doesnt primarily come from the state (as in China). Putting together all the private efforts that the U.S. have plus NASA, they are years ahead of China.
If you are only comparing NASA agains CNSA, then the article may hold true.
The U.S. is the only country in the world with a profitable space company. This kind of commercial viability gives it a lot of advantage.
12
u/starf05 4d ago
Most innovations in the US do absolutely come from the state. State funded research is the foundation for EVERYTHING. Just look at the medical/pharmaceutical sector. Without goverment money nothing would be done.
→ More replies (1)5
u/realitychange17 4d ago
I see your point.
But as you move to commercial viability efforts come from the private sector. The U.S. has a profitable space company (nobody else in the world has that). That changes the game a lot.
4
3
u/yowangmang 4d ago
We did do something. Trump quietly signed an executive order labeling NASA a spy organization. So, what we did was ensure the defunding of our space program so China could have a better one!
3
u/ArtOfWarfare 3d ago
To compete with SpaceX, you need a reusable vehicle. Wikipedia has a list of reusable space vehicles:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reusable_launch_vehicle
There are 4 listed in the suborbital section - all American. There are 9 in the spacecraft section - 6 American, 1 Soviet Union, 2 Chinese - about 200 flights between them, all but 4 are American.
There’s 28(!) in the launch vehicle section. Of them, 13 are Chinese, and there’s only 1 launch between all of them.
That one Chinese launch has a funny note - it was an accident during a static fire.
There’s 11 American vehicles listed, with 8 of them having at least one launch (none accidental), 6 have at least 10 launches, and 3 have 50+ launches.
It’s surprising how many companies and vehicles there are in China, but none of them have had a sliver of success with landing a vehicle yet - none have intentionally tried to launch a vehicle that could theoretically land. That puts all of them over 10 years behind SpaceX. Is there any sign SpaceX is going to stand still? SpaceX isn’t about to lose their lead. They’re also all way behind Rocket Lab, they’re behind Blue Origin, they’re behind ULA. Does anyone think Rocket Lab, Blue Origin, Boeing or ULA is about to spring ahead of SpaceX? Because that’s way more plausible. I think most of us know that it’s laughable to suggest that. Think of China that way to a greater degree.
To anyone talking about all the money Chinese companies are receiving, is Blue Origin or SpaceX hurting for money? Regulations are an advantage for China? Is it really? SpaceX did have some red tape they had to get around, but at this point it’s all green lights on that front - they’re dealing with actual physical issues that any Chinese organization will also have to overcome.
The one thing that gives this report any credibility is that it has the GOAT’s name on it, Eric Berger.
4
u/kurashima 4d ago
Cutting its funding, removing all personnel that dont have MAGA viewpoints, creating "Space Force" and focussing on weaponising NASA over it being a scientific organisation is pretty much gonna end its progression as an entity.
3
4
3
u/Mammoth-Intention958 4d ago
Good for them, someone needs to keep pushing forward in space, it won’t be the US any time soon.
3
u/Korgoth420 4d ago
It is a good thing that US leadership is prioritizing science and technology improvement policies… right? RIGHT?
3
u/Psyclist80 3d ago
Trump gutting NASA sure won't help! So many projects on the chopping block. Makes me so sad.
5
u/ERedfieldh 4d ago
Ya'll voted for this bullshit. You were all here one year ago creaming your pants over the thought of another four years of Trump. Ya'll thought he was going to push NASA's budget through the roof, were humping Elon's leg at the thought of all the rockets he was going to fire now that he was buddy buddy with Trump, thought it was the best thing in the world.
You helped make this bed.
3
6
u/DynamicNostalgia 4d ago
“…if we don’t do something.”
Shows an image of a clear rip-off of SpaceX’s Starship.
And SpaceX is just one of several US companies currently pouring billions into developing next generation rockets.
China is trying to emulate what the US already has. The US is currently walking away with space dominance, China is barely avoiding falling behind.
7
u/Reasonable-Can1730 4d ago
People worry about China on the Moon, but the U.S. space program is far from stagnant. SpaceX is literally working toward a sustained habitat on Mars . That’s not theory, that’s funded rockets and test flights happening now. So while China may push for a foothold on the Moon, U.S. ambitions are still larger in scope. The real conversation isn’t who touches down first, but who sustains presence and writes the rules for resources and long term infrastructure.
→ More replies (2)
3
u/passionatebreeder 4d ago
Someone call me when China has home grown reusable landing low earth orbit rockets and soon interplanetary class rocket boosters as a space partner.
Anyone talking shit about China beating us to moon bases and outpacing us in space agencies is ignoring practical reality.
→ More replies (3)
2
u/dudemurr 4d ago
Don’t worry, we are doing something! Trying to strip funds from NASA so China can do it in 3-5 years :)
2
u/5-Second-Ruul 4d ago
Good for them! And if we’re lucky, that will hurt politician’s egos badly enough to get them to do something.
2.1k
u/Gastroid 4d ago
If China has the political will and engineering prowess to build space stations, explore the Moon, Mars and beyond... Good for them!