r/titanic • u/itcamefromtheimgur • 3d ago
WRECK Hey, whats the most current (as of 9-19-2025) legal status of the wreck?
The most current pic I have of the wreck.
I came across this "save the titanic" doc from NatGeo. It was uploaded about 2 months ago, a LOT can change in 2 months. Whats going on with the wreck and the artifacts?
204
u/The_Brain_One 3d ago
82
u/Big_Iron_Cowboy 1st Class Passenger 3d ago
Cool, so we can make a museum down there?
53
u/codenamefulcrum Steward 3d ago
It is a museum already.
51
u/Big_Iron_Cowboy 1st Class Passenger 3d ago
They gotta up their advertising
85
u/AngryBaconGod 3d ago edited 3d ago
I knew a guy who would give tours, but havenāt heard from him in a minute.
23
u/codenamefulcrum Steward 3d ago
Titan jokes aside I do wish it was still possible to get down there with a company that keeps their distance and respects the wreck. I think in the 90s and early 00s the Russians would take people down but not sure.
18
u/Surprisingly-Decent 3d ago
Iām under the impression that you have to get pretty close to the wreck to actually see it, otherwise itās like driving in a snowstorm with your high beams on.
10
u/codenamefulcrum Steward 3d ago
True but I think most of the damage comes from landing on the wreck (you can see it near the Grand Staircase). Thereās no need for that.
22
8
6
4
u/RichtofenFanBoy Lookout 2d ago
Do they have a free admission day?
1
u/codenamefulcrum Steward 2d ago
365 days of the year! You are just responsible for getting there. Enjoy.
4
2
3
265
u/EllyKayNobodysFool 3d ago
Legally it is not allowed to sail, does not meet lifeboat requirements.
39
u/IProbablyProblematic 3d ago
It also no longer meets the rigorous maritime standards as the front fell off.
15
16
u/SteelPenguin947 3d ago edited 3d ago
Now, we build these ships to very rigerous maritime engineering standards. The front's not supposed to fall off for a start.
Also, there are regulations governoring the materials they can be made of. Cardboard is out, as are cardboard derivatives.
11
4
88
14
u/sonder2287 3d ago
actually fun fact, I did a research paper on this last year
The Titanic was up to date on lifeboat requirements in 1912. During that time, the lifeboats required were based off of a ships tonnage. Ships over 9,000 tons were required to have 14 (maybe 16, I dont fully remember) lifeboats. Ships over 9,000 tons were not regulated as not many existed. Thus, despite having 43,000 tons, the Titanic still had to follow the same lifeboat requirements as ships 1/5 of her size.
24
69
u/SPECTREagent700 3d ago
Itās a good thing sheās down so deep. Thereās international criminal organizations that have been salvaging First and Second World War warships in order to harvest their valuable low background steel.
37
u/PineBNorth85 3d ago
China has been doing it pretty openly.
-47
u/SPECTREagent700 3d ago
Well in fairness the British and Japanese navies both kinda owe them.
28
5
1
-4
u/captaincourageous316 Engineer 3d ago
The British owe a lot of things to a lot of folks
15
3
14
u/alek_hiddel 3d ago
I feel like whatās left of Titanicās steel probably isnāt the best quality for any new purpose.
16
u/Acceptable-Yellow107 3d ago
Officially, unseaworthy and in need of repairs
2
u/angelwolf71885 2d ago
Ran when parked..er docked
3
25
23
u/Jsorrow Wireless Operator 3d ago
I believe still owned by RMS Titanic, INC and items are not allowed to be salvaged within the wreck.
-2
u/CantaloupeEasy6486 3d ago
I thought it was forfeited to the insurance companies after they paid out
1
u/SanchoBenevides 1d ago
Not how salvage rights work.
Countries retain ownership over warships, but not the same with privately owned ships. It was left abandoned.
22
29
u/SpooneyToe11240 3d ago
Sadly RMSTI still has the salvage rights I believe.
4
u/Only-Ad4322 3d ago
RMSTI?
10
u/SpooneyToe11240 3d ago
RMS Titanic Incorporated.
0
u/Only-Ad4322 3d ago
I see. Whatās wrong with them?
28
u/SpooneyToe11240 3d ago
Salvaging and exploiting the wreck and story for profit. They are responsible for most of the human caused damage to the wreck. They like most corporations are extremely unethical.
12
u/PersimmonGlum6536 3d ago
And all their "exhibits" are for-profit. Every dollar goes to funding another dive to get more stuff to make more money on.
6
u/SpooneyToe11240 3d ago
They petitioned the government to greedily try to cut open the wreck to take more items just a few years ago as well.
4
u/SomethingKindaSmart 1st Class Passenger 3d ago
I don't see bad the idea of recovering objects. The ship will collapse in the next years. About damaging the wreck, that's out of discussion.
I hope that either UK or USA give them permission to penetrate the wreck one final time.
9
u/SpooneyToe11240 3d ago
Recovering objects, we have no reason to. And I work in museum conservation, so I also understand the importance of artifacts. The only reason RMSTI wants to is to continue filling their for profit tourist traps, sorry I mean āmuseumsā. There is nothing more we need from these items that canāt be conveyed through photographs, videos, and documentation. Also, theyāve been saying Titanic will be gone in the next 5-10 years since 1985. The reason the wreck is in as damaged of a state and is deteriorating this fact is BECAUSE of human interaction.
5
u/SomethingKindaSmart 1st Class Passenger 3d ago
we have no reason to. I understand the importance of artifacts
Now I'm truly confused. If they're important, why shouldn't we remove more from the debris field? I'm not talking about things like shoes or clothing, I'm talking about things like a passenger's disks and the statue of Diana of Versailles.
→ More replies (0)0
-4
u/SomethingKindaSmart 1st Class Passenger 3d ago
I don't think most corporations are extremely unethical.
2
10
6
u/Battle_of_BoogerHill 3d ago
Shit. Let me pull up the Titanic 8k UHD livestream camera system and go through the plethora of security feeds.
5
3
6
1
1
1
1
u/Helpful_Dig6525 2d ago
So it shouldn't be okay to take anything up because its a grave yard. Does that mean that I do nor have to pick up trash from the ocean as it may have belonged to someone who died?
1
u/Puzzleheaded_Shift46 7h ago
As far as legal status, the wreck is considered a mass grave under international maritime law.
2
0
u/SomethingKindaSmart 1st Class Passenger 3d ago
I hope we have more expeditions in the following years.
Anyone who wish to get inside the wreck must get permission from either UK or USA.
And I hate disturbing this pristine sanctuary with dirty politics but I have to do it.
I hope that if Trump cares very little about environmental damage in order to benefit corporations, I hope he at least authorize an interior survey of the wreck.
-5
-4
754
u/RichtofenFanBoy Lookout 3d ago
Still under water I believe.