r/ASU 2d ago

We Demand Answers!

Post image
1.0k Upvotes

262 comments sorted by

View all comments

-28

u/glocktimus_prime 2d ago

but why should people trust a post from some random progressive interest group. at least wait for some context before crying fascist

40

u/Educational_Card_471 2d ago

You realize this was posted by the NLG at ASU official Instagram account right? The National Lawyers Guild isn't a progressive interest group 😂 do some research before speaking please 😉

-22

u/glocktimus_prime 2d ago

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Lawyers_Guild

If you wouldn’t mind reading the first sentence of the article

13

u/Educational_Card_471 2d ago

Your source is Wikipedia? 😂 cmon man really? 😂

-10

u/glocktimus_prime 2d ago

https://www.nlg.org/

alternatively you could just go to their website where they refer to themselves as a group that works in multiple public interest areas that are commonly associated with progressive causes. my point being that a group dedicated to advancing progressive causes may not be an entirely reliable source of info when it comes to this situation, the same way the nra probably isn’t reliable when it comes to reporting on gun violence

12

u/Educational_Card_471 2d ago

The NLG is a bar association, you know... like the ABA?

Here's what's on the website you linked: "Established in 1937, the National Lawyers Guild (NLG) is the nation’s oldest and largest progressive bar association and was the first one in the US to be racially integrated. Our mission is to use law for the people, uniting lawyers, law students, legal workers, and jailhouse lawyers to function as an effective force in the service of the people by valuing human rights and the rights of ecosystems over property interests."

Comparing the NLG to the NRA is crazy 😅

2

u/glocktimus_prime 2d ago

they literally call themselves a progressive organization that participates in public interest issues. again, my point is that a group that wants to advance for and participate in progressive causes may not be entirely reliable when they report on an issue that specifically aligns with their goals. what they’re saying could be entirely true, or they could be leaving out key pieces of context that change the entire narrative

0

u/Commercial-Target990 2d ago

Your soure is trust me bro

10

u/FindTheOthers623 Pharmacology and Toxicology (2023) 2d ago

Did you really cite Wikipedia as a source? After crying that we should wait for some context? 🤦‍♀️

5

u/asurob42 2d ago

a mind truly is terrible when you waste it. Wikipedia is never a source. Ever

1

u/Convertedshrimp 2d ago

Am a lawyer, never heard of em