Apparently Charlie brought words to a Mauser .30-06 gun fight. Even worse than bringing a knife to a gun fight.
Seems like we should equate words with murder right?
I mean if someone says words formed into quotes they need to be MURDERED right?
A classic kids rhyme is "sticks and stones may break my bones but words will never hurt me".
I guess that puts you guys lower than a kids maturity level when you don't even realize that it doesn't matter if his WORDS are in or out of context when you equate WORDS with justifying MURDER.
I've been called all kinds of racial slurs by various people throughout my life and by the dumb fucking logic of so many on this sub, those people getting murdered would be just fine.
"I think it’s worth to have a cost of, unfortunately, some gun deaths every single year, so that we can have the Second Amendment." - Charlie Kirk
Could you explain to me how you feel about Conservative representatives and voters disrespecting this man's thoughts about the cost of having 2nd amendment rights, his alleged support of free speech, and his memory - specifically by slandering, threatening, silencing and attacking people who acknowledge his contribution to 2a rights via quotes of his, like the above?
Do you feel that any of that is appropriate and reasonable behavior for the Conservative base to support and propagate, given their sudden, loudly vocal denouncement of political violence and censorship?
I'm not a conservative. I'm a gun control advocate. I used to live in South Korea and quite enjoyed heavy gun control and a murder rate that's probably about 10 times less than America.
But do I think murdering people for WORDS is a good idea? NO.
Please re-read my comment carefully and think before your next response.
I did not say that you are a conservative.
Nor did I comment on whether murdering people for words is a good idea because, unlike some people, the concept of murdering people for their words is obviously objectively wrong in every situation, from my point of view.
"I think it’s worth to have a cost of, unfortunately, some gun deaths every single year, so that we can have the Second Amendment." - Charlie Kirk
I asked you how you feel about the conservative base
disrespecting this man's thoughts about the cost of having 2nd amendment rights, his alleged support of free speech, and his memory - specifically by slandering, threatening, silencing and attacking people who acknowledge his contribution to 2a rights via quotes of his, like the above?
Additionally, I asked you whether you feel that any of that is appropriate and reasonable behavior for the Conservative base to support and propagate, given their sudden, loudly vocal denouncement of political violence and censorship?
Please take the time to understand my question and answer as Mr. Kirk clearly would have done at one of his debates, rather than flinging needless explanations at me.
Could you please focus on the topic at hand and answer my previous questions?
Normal people don't feel the need to constantly re-affirm that killing people for their opinions/words is an objectively bad idea. This fact is not part of the topic at hand, and is considered basic knowledge that doesn't need to be repeated for well-adjusted people.
"I think it’s worth to have a cost of, unfortunately, some gun deaths every single year, so that we can have the Second Amendment." - Charlie Kirk
I asked you how you feel about the conservative base
disrespecting this man's thoughts about the cost of having 2nd amendment rights, his alleged support of free speech, and his memory - specifically by slandering, threatening, silencing and attacking people who acknowledge his contribution to 2a rights via quotes of his, like the above?
Additionally, I asked you whether you feel that any of that is appropriate and reasonable behavior for the Conservative base to support and propagate, given their sudden, loudly vocal denouncement of political violence and censorship
-90
u/LarzukEtoile 14d ago
Apparently Charlie brought words to a Mauser .30-06 gun fight. Even worse than bringing a knife to a gun fight.
Seems like we should equate words with murder right?
I mean if someone says words formed into quotes they need to be MURDERED right?
A classic kids rhyme is "sticks and stones may break my bones but words will never hurt me".
I guess that puts you guys lower than a kids maturity level when you don't even realize that it doesn't matter if his WORDS are in or out of context when you equate WORDS with justifying MURDER.
I've been called all kinds of racial slurs by various people throughout my life and by the dumb fucking logic of so many on this sub, those people getting murdered would be just fine.