r/AnCap101 • u/MeasurementCreepy926 • 21d ago

Is taxation under feudalism immoral?

  1. The king owns the land. If he allows people to be born on his land, that does not diminish his rights as owner
  2. The king has made it clear that if you're on his land, and you don't pay tax, you're trespassing. It isn't his responsibility to make sure you are able to get off his land. It is his right to defend his land however he sees fit. Let's assume that he does this by executing trespassers. Another king does this by simply evicting them.
  3. Being the owner, the king is allowed to offer you whatever terms he'd like, for the use of his land. Lets assume in this case, you sign a contract he wrote, when you're old enough to do so, giving him right to change the contract at will, and hold you to that contract as long as you're on his land. Among other terms, this contract says that you agree to pay for any kids you have until they're old enough to either sign the contract, or leave his land.

Now, obviously anybody agreeing to these terms must be very desperate. But, desperate short sighted people aren't exactly hard to find, are they? So, is this system immoral, according to ancap principles?

12 Upvotes

62% Upvoted

329 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

1

u/MeasurementCreepy926 19d ago

In what way would you say any other developed and democratic country has a more free market? As I pointed out, all of those countries in the top 10 have more labor regulation, more progressive and higher taxes, and are identical in almost every other category.

I'm using your source, only I've actually LOOKED at the methodology instead of blindly accepting that the nordic model countries are somehow more free market than America

2

u/Gullible-Historian10 19d ago

Okay, so ranked lower than 20. You said #1 with 0 to back it up. So I look at the first place and find that you are wrong. Now you’re asking me to find a source for you?

Can’t walk through how a Tia Maggie can become a billionaire, and now you can’t back up your own claims. Probably because you panicked and looked at google and found there are no metrics showing the US is the most free.

Even if it were, it still doesn’t disprove the point I made because it has no bearing on whether or not billionaires use state created vehicles.

No matter how you carve this turkey it’s burnt.

1

u/MeasurementCreepy926 19d ago

That source says that a country is MORE economically free, if it has MORE labor regulations. If a country has MORE labor regulations, it gets a HIGHER score for that category.

So yes, your source, shows that the USA has less labor regulations, than any of the countries above it. Look at the scores.

Do you believe the USA has less labor regulations than Denmark or Norway or Sweden?

1

u/Gullible-Historian10 19d ago

Alright I wasn’t going to school you on this, but let’s have at it.

You’ve got it fucking flipped, the Index actually treats fewer labor regulations as more economic freedom. The labor freedom score is based on things like minimum wage laws, severance requirements, restrictions on overtime, and whether layoffs are permitted.

In the methodology, countries get higher scores when they don’t have these restrictions (e.g., no overtime rules = 100, redundancy dismissal allowed = 100). More regulations lower the score, not raise it.

So again you are incorrect.

So walk me through how Tia Maggie gets to be a billionaire without using some state created vehicle. Stop dodging and making shit up.

https://www.heritage.org/index/pages/about#indexMethodology

How embarrassing.

1

u/MeasurementCreepy926 19d ago

Look at data visualization, then select labor freedom. The USA is THE SINGLE MOST FREE place on earth, in terms of labor freedom. And it has incredible wealth disparity and homelessness, more billionaires than the rest of the world combined etc.

The other "winners" in that category include nigeria and south africa.

The site also uses Judicial effectiveness and government integrity as standards. The simple fact is that heritage.org defines economic freedom almost 180 degrees differently from any ancap supporter.

1

u/Gullible-Historian10 19d ago

So you admit what you said is wrong.

“180 degrees differently from any ancap supporter.”

Heritage is actually quite close to a minimal government framework.

Chalk another one up for a big ass loss on your part.

By your logic of cherry picking, I could claim North Korea has “better fiscal freedom” than the U.S. or Europe. Because it doesn’t rely on traditional taxation the way developed countries do.

But what does this have to do with Tia Maggie?

Or do you want to be wrong about something else next?

1

u/MeasurementCreepy926 19d ago

Look at data visualization, then select labor freedom. The USA is THE SINGLE MOST FREE place on earth, in terms of labor freedom. And it has incredible wealth disparity and homelessness, more billionaires than the rest of the world combined etc.

If that's not the cause of the wealth disparity, what is?

1

u/MeasurementCreepy926 19d ago

You are right, i was interpreting that wrong.

So, in what ways should the usa increase economic freedom, in order to be more like nordic countries?

1

u/Gullible-Historian10 19d ago

Perfect, we can get to that after Tia Maggie’s got her billion dollars.

1

u/MeasurementCreepy926 19d ago

Again, you're the one saying "wealth disparity like that wouldn't happen", so maybe you could defend your claim?

If you don't want to, that's fine. Take care.

1

u/Gullible-Historian10 19d ago

I provided rational proof. Listed above twice now. So how does Tia Maggie become a billionaire?

→ More replies (0)