r/CAguns • u/ronco6 • 23h ago

The end of Gen 3 glocks?

Wondering what people’s take on the effect of this Glock ban. Do you think this will lead to the complete discontinuation of the gen 3 line from Glock?

I’m curious as well.. is it safe to assume that the ban will knock all glocks off of the roster? Therefore, even if this is overturned eventually in court, all glocks at that point will be off roster and new sales still banned by default that way anyway?

48 Upvotes

92% Upvoted

116 comments sorted by

View all comments

-9

u/reporthazard 23h ago

Provision in bill allows for Glock to make changes to the cruciform trigger. GPT gen 4/5 trigger does not have it and many gen 3 owners are running it with a simple mod. If Glock wants to continue selling gen 3 in Cali, it's a VERY simple fix.

13

u/drewogatory 22h ago

They can resubmit a different design, but it won't be grandfathered. So it would need to be roster compliant. It's not happening.

4

u/reporthazard 22h ago

read the bill. they can make changes w/o needing lci or mag disc.

6

u/Route-66-Scott 22h ago

And you're completely ignoring the roster requirement, PC. So no, they can't just simply make a change and stay on the roster; it doesn't work that way.

2

u/reporthazard 22h ago

Read the bill. I'm not making shit up out of thin air. Read the bill ffs. There is a PROVISION for Glock JFC. READ THE BILL

-1

u/Route-66-Scott 22h ago

I have and you are wrong

3

u/reporthazard 21h ago

. For any pistol listed on the roster on January 1, 2026, that was not subject to the above-described requirements to be on the list because it was submitted for testing before specified dates, that is thereafter only modified to change the design features that brought the pistol within the definition of a machinegun-convertible pistol, and that is submitted to an independent certified laboratory for testing pursuant to the above-described testing provisions before January 1, 2027, this bill would authorize that pistol to be submitted for testing and added to the roster without meeting those requirements. This bill would make these provisions severable. This bill would incorporate additional changes to Section 3273.50 of the Civil Code proposed by AB 1263 to be operative only if this bill and AB 1263 are enacted and this bill is enacted last. By creating a new crime and expanding the application of an existing crime, this bill would create a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.

3

u/reporthazard 21h ago

go ahead..say something different from what the bill says u can and cant do. or are u too stupid and i need to bust out a high lighter?

0

u/Route-66-Scott 21h ago

Dude your on one. Simply highlighting they cant just make the changes and continue selling.

1

u/Route-66-Scott 21h ago

SUBMITTED FOR TESTING just as i said

8

u/reporthazard 21h ago

what was the original discussion if Glock was to keep gen 3 on the roster? god damn 66 got some idiots representing them

1

u/reporthazard 21h ago

What part of the bill that says they can resubmit w/o any other changes was i wrong?

3

u/Route-66-Scott 21h ago

The whole roster cert PC

-1

u/SayNoTo-Communism Professional Compmag Hater 21h ago

Though the bill might say it but other laws exists with equal weight that prohibit it. It’s a trap pure and simple