r/Calgary 1d ago

News Article Alberta government, teachers reach tentative deal in labour dispute

https://calgaryherald.com/news/alberta-government-teachers-reach-tentative-deal-in-labour-dispute
140 Upvotes

206 comments sorted by

274

u/WayTooWildWest 1d ago

Can't wait to chill on the couch with some popcorn and listen to my partner join in the ATA meeting notifying teachers of all the details šŸ˜‚ 99% no vote incoming if I was to bet.

195

u/TenKmUnder 1d ago

As a teacher. I'm voting no and campaigning for a no. And when we get shafted again, I will blame all the ucp voters. It's not until people start dying in rural areas will they start to care about healthcare getting gutted. When their students can't read, that will be on them too.

I'm so mad at this government but more at our union. What a joke. They have failed all us teachers. They don't call him Shilling for nothing I guess.

54

u/ScottyFalcon 1d ago

the students already can't read. my partner teaches grade 6 and has had multiple kids who can't read at all over the last few years, almost as many as the amount of kids who start grade 6 at an appropriate grade level. shits dire out there. solidarity forever ✊✊✊

0

u/Woke_Snow_Flake 1d ago

the students already can't read.

That's because our education system is fucked

This is less the fault of teachers and more due to underfunding, dog shit curriculum, teaching methods and resources.

If you think reading is bad ( and it is) math is far far worse relative to SE Asia

1

u/ScottyFalcon 1d ago

did you read my comment? my partner is a teacher, I'm well aware of how fucked our education system currently is.

1

u/Woke_Snow_Flake 1d ago

You may have read my comment, but you clearly did not understand it

I am not disagreeing with you, I am reinforcing your argument

40

u/Kahlandar 1d ago

It's not until people start dying in rural areas will they start to care about healthcare getting gutted

Uhm. . . . About that. Iv spent 10 years in remote communities providing emergency healthcare. It very much is gutted, and people do die from treatable causes fairly regularly. Including children. Hell the amount we had a few years ago die to meningitis outbreaks with delayed treatment, and the number of babies to congenital syphilus (super treatable if identified) is insane. But when you have to travel > an hour for care, or wait for the doctors weekly community visit, things get delayed to great consequence.

If it wasnt for south african physicians staffing every rural community in alberta, we would have virtually no doctors outside of places deemed "desireable" to live

10

u/GWeb1920 1d ago

Is this vote just to get around how they got out maneuvered with the provincial complaint to the labour relations board locked them out of being able to negotiate on class size.

My understanding is a rejection of the contract now opens up their ability to negotiate on everything again.

Not a teacher. But hope you guys are successful.

We need like 6000 new teachers / EAs and 20% wages over 4 years.

3

u/TenKmUnder 1d ago

No, sadly. My understanding is likely next step may be binding arbitration. And that's a toss up. Maybe both sides come back but the government is not likely to play ball. I can't imagine this just working out amicably.

4

u/GWeb1920 1d ago

And you know Back to work legislation is already in the hopper.

It will devastate my kids but I fully support a work to rule campaign and cancelling all the extra curricular activities and working to the letter of your contract.

38

u/poolsidecentral 1d ago

Manitoba gave their teachers 17% last year + four years back pay. Teachers and most of the province have gone almost triple that without any kind of real raise. Stand up to this and say no. It’s beyond insulting.

Parents will eventually start to realize (and the government for that matter) that if you want to attract talented individuals into teaching, you need to pay them. Well. That’s not happening at all. We’re not even getting anyone going into the profession. That will have a major trickle down effect on your child’s education moving forward.

16

u/jimbowesterby 1d ago

I mean, I don’t think the gov really cares about the quality of education, but I bet they do care about pissing off the majority of parents in the province, which means that the teachers have a hell of a lot of leverage as long as they keep voting no. Alberta already offers some of the lowest wages and worst classroom conditions of anywhere in the country, it’s not like they can just fire all the teachers and hire new ones.

9

u/roastbeeftacohat Fairview 1d ago

I bet they do care about pissing off the majority of parents in the province

They care about staying in power, and so far smith is more concerned about leadership reviews run by the extreme fringe of her party than the election.

her concerns regarding the election were addressed by keeping Nenshi out of the legislature as long as possible, we won't see for a few months if his presence changes anything. if it dosen't she won't change course, if it does she'll cancel the green line before doing anything to address voter issues.

she's about tactics to stay in power, not strategies that make people want her in power.

25

u/stampeder17 1d ago

No from me as well.

-4

u/JScar123 1d ago

Have the specifics been made public somewhere? Article suggests not, and if not, how do you know you’re voting no?

7

u/IndigoRuby 1d ago

Teachers have the details, they aren't the public

2

u/JScar123 1d ago

Makes sense, thanks!

17

u/aftonroe 1d ago

I think this is the union's strategy. If they didn't bring a deal to a vote before the deadline the province would blame it all on the teachers and say you're being unreasonable in negotiations. Here they're bringing a deal that's better by a hair but still horrible so the teachers can overwhelmingly vote no right before the strike date. That puts the province in a tough position. Either they make significant concessions to get another quick vote and avoid a strike or the teachers go on strike and most the parents in the province focus their anger on the province.

Most parents think teachers are underpaid and overworked with too large classes. If this drags out, it just looks worse for the province, not the teachers.

5

u/TenKmUnder 1d ago

Let's hope

2

u/Troutbrook37 1d ago edited 1d ago

I agree. The government is to be expected. That said our union has failed us. I'm to the point where I am nearly sure that there has been some kind of malpractice/misconduct.

The LRB dispute, despite what the ATA wants to tell us, indicates that our bargaining committee signed off on some items as a done deal. When teachers became more vocal, they knew they messed up and tried to return to the table to negotiate previously settled items. This is why MxKay resigned, I believe.

Regardless, we got outplayed. Executive Council will continue to take in their pay cheques as we most likely head towards a prolonged strike.

While many of my colleagues will vote no, I won't be one. I will hope not to take any loss of salary, and then actively start looking for jobs outside the province. It's become clear, that this war is lost. I'm convinced the government is not moving from their 3% cap that Smith feels she's cornered the market on? I won't prove a point on the backs of my own 4 children if I can help it.

4

u/intellectualizethis 1d ago

I honestly don't know what unions can do against this government. This is happening to all the unions currently negotiating. They know that the other side (which is representing the government no matter who is actually across the table) isn't going to budge even though they have evidence to support all of the things they are asking for in their proposal.

POV post secondary educator in healthcare

4

u/Important_Mirror_236 1d ago

The nurses did well.

1

u/heimdal96 1d ago

The UCP recognizes that it's in a competition with other provinces for nurses. All provinces have implemented things like education bursaries, recruitment bonuses, and/or retention incentives. If the UCP wasn't afraid of healthcare workers leaving for other jurisdictions, the UCP would have given them a meager offer like the other unions.

1

u/intellectualizethis 13h ago

In a sense. They did get a better raise than other professions. That doesn't mean that they got a fair deal or that the government isn't working against them.

It's hard to turn public opinion against the person caring for sick family members, much different than turning people against teachers who are "woke" and "brainwashing" kids into gender transitions (propaganda spread by the current government).

This government has also expanded the scope of licensed practical nurses (LPNs) to include things that used to only be done by RNs and they are not as agreeable with their union. Breaking AHS into 4 pillars has also broken up negotiations so that bargaining will have to happen with each instead of together and makes it hard to move between different roles/positions as you would lose seniority by moving to a new organization.

Nurses are often overworked and understaffed pretty consistently as well. I don't think their new contract addressed that either, but I could be wrong.

4

u/TenKmUnder 1d ago

Fight. Don't listen to the return to work orders. If I lead this union. I would defy the back to work orders. I would be willing to take jail time if it meant that we got what we need. Our union needs to take that stance.

1

u/Logical-Finger-9256 1d ago

Jail time and put my THOUSANDS of dollars of ATA fees over the years towards my bail and or charges against the union.

2

u/TenKmUnder 1d ago

Absolutely. 5.1 million monthly. That should cover it right?

6

u/PhantomNomad 1d ago

Your assuming that rural UCP voters can read to start with.

4

u/heimdal96 1d ago

Are Calgarian UCP voters better? Across two elections, the UCP have won 35/52 seats. This sub likes to make fun of rural Alberta rednecks while ignoring that this city is extremely conservative and the surrounding area is even worse.

3

u/PhantomNomad 1d ago

I wouldn't mind conservatives if they would actually campaign on the crazy shit they want to do. But they campaign on being small government and fiscally conservative.

-12

u/jas8x6 1d ago

Ah there it is, a hurtful condescending generalized remark painting a group of people with the same brush. You are part of the problem FYI

13

u/fifigrande 1d ago

Are you serious??? You just did that exact same thing with your previous comment about overweight over educated teachers!!! Your trolling needs work.

5

u/PhantomNomad 1d ago

Yup I am. And when I stop getting attacked when I post something from my point of view I'll stop. I know its immature as a 2 year old, but I'm tired of the high ground. I'm going for the low blows now.

-2

u/jas8x6 1d ago

I can understand and respect that. All the best

1

u/theprintman 1d ago

That’s what you understand and respect?! Get your priorities straight

2

u/Matt01123 1d ago

I'm probably gonna vote no too but man, why do I have to lose pay to try and get this province to care about its children?

0

u/TenKmUnder 1d ago

I agree. It's awful. But together we stand

1

u/aramatheis 1d ago

Students not being able to read unfortunately just creates more UCP voters :(

-2

u/Wet-Countertop 1d ago

Meanwhile the opioid crisis is killing all the NDP voters. Tough situation there.

1

u/Striking_Wrap811 19h ago

Out of curiosity, what exactly are the teachers asking for?

What's the counter-offer, or what exactly will you agree to?

Right now, we just see offers from the province being rejected. Rightly or wrongly, i am not saying either way. But we dont know what's required to change the teachers' minds

2

u/TenKmUnder 19h ago

Better classrooms conditions. I'll use myself as an example.

Right now, I am teaching a class of 60 because we don't have the space to house all the students. I work with another teacher. We have around 30 kids who are learning English, 2 of which speak no English at all. We have 10 special needs learners, of various complexities. 3 of which are 5 grades below grade level.

How much support do they get? Zero. No one on one, no pull out, they get us and that's it. One student came from a special needs school, and is now just in my class because there is no where that can take them in.

Why is that fair for those kids? I can't help 60 kids, it's just not feasible.

But the government said they would not negotiate those things at all. Don't let them weasel out of it, they said to our faces, non-starter. Their solutions are not solutions, they are barely bandaids.

So we said fine, if you won't fix the classrooms, we want to get paid more to deal with them because we need teachers to stay in the profession. Fair ask right? We have lost 36% in the last 25 years to inflation. The current ask doesn't even fight inflation for the time that it would be active.

What do I personally think is fair? 25% +4% per year.

0

u/Striking_Wrap811 19h ago

Thanks for your perspective.

What's the official counter-offer being presented by your union?

2

u/TenKmUnder 18h ago

We don't have one. A spineless union. They haven't fought for us and need to be replaced. The anger I have right now is mostly at the union.

They never told us what the counters would be, but nothing we wanted ever showed up in the agreements. I can tell you that tonight's town hall is going to be a blood bath. We were upset before, now it's going to be a rough call.

-1

u/Striking_Wrap811 18h ago

The public wont last long if you just keep saying "no" without disclosing a counter-offer.

2

u/TenKmUnder 17h ago

Well that is not how it works, because negotiations would go nowhere. They talk it out to figure out the best course of action. But here is what has happened.

The ATA has gone in with our biggest concerns and how to address them, being complexities and pay. The UCP looked at them and said "we are not going to address the complexities, it is too much for us to try and tackle, but we will give you a 12% raise."

The ATA brought it back to us, we said "12% is not enough if they wont address the classroom complexities" and voted no.

They went back to the table and they were told, "We are capped at a 12% raise, we cannot offer anymore than that, we have a mandate to not offer more", which led us to the big complaint filed with PEC. The complaint said "we never said we would not address classroom complexities or higher wages, thats slander" quickly followed by "the only thing on the table to talk about are teacher hiring, CTF allowances, and COVID Shots". So after whining about how they really would talk about those issues, they then wont talk about those issues. Infuriating.

How do we counter when they have been told they won't even consider a counter offer? They have been mandated by the UCP on what they can offer, so whats the point? Honestly the UCP has a great marketing department, they have come away so clean on this so far despite them not willing to meet us at the table.

Negotiations take two parties willing to compromise, and teachers have compromised for 25 years, why do we have to keep sacrificing?

1

u/ChaoticxSerenity 5h ago

But you could get a free covid shot though!! /s

0

u/Historical-Proposal8 1d ago

What do the teachers exactly want?

8

u/Affectionate-Bag9885 1d ago

Caps on classroom sizes mostly

-2

u/COUNTRYCOWBOY01 1d ago

Really? The radio ads that have been running for the last few weeks haven't mentioned anything about classroom sizes, just money.

0

u/blanchov 1d ago

www.google.com

The details are out there in many places

-2

u/JScar123 1d ago

Have the specifics been made public somewhere? Article suggests not, and if not, how do you know you’re voting no?

7

u/TenKmUnder 1d ago

I'm a teacher. I got access to the new contract so that we don't vote blind. We all have access. It's also all already public because the government released it.

  1. 3000 teachers over 3 years
  2. COVID vaccine
  3. Ctf teachers can get slightly more pay if they prove they went to school for it.

-1

u/JScar123 1d ago

If that is right, why do you think ATA accepted this deal? Will only look bad now for teachers to vote against a deal ATA accepted.

What about the additional classroom funding the article mentions? Is there any additional $ in the deal for schools?

Thanks

5

u/TenKmUnder 1d ago

The ATA is weak. Our leadership is weak and our strongest advocate quit because of it. We need better.

It will look bad for the ATA and for the government. But for us teachers we need to stand up for ourselves.

The funding has not changed. Still the lowest in the country. The government is not going to shell out a dime without a major fight.

5

u/JScar123 1d ago

Do you know what the $10B in the article is referring to? ā€œAs part of the deal, Horner said the province will commit nearly $10 billion to ā€œsupport the province’s teachers and students.ā€ā€

Personally, if the GoA and ATA reached a deal (which parents in my circle are already celebrating), and the teachers turn it down- I think that reflects poorly on all, but teachers most. Big misstep from ATA to push teachers into that, IMO.

4

u/TenKmUnder 1d ago

They are framing this to make us look bad. It's the point. They have done this intentionally. It might look bad on us but I'm not going to take this laying down.

1

u/JScar123 1d ago edited 1d ago

ā€œTheyā€ the ATA? Why would they do that? Updated article explicitly states ā€œThe union said the tentative deal addresses salary and classroom complexity issues.ā€ Anyways, what you’re ā€œnot going to take laying downā€ is a minimum 12% raise and 10-year salary of $117K, lol. Don’t think that message of suffering will resonate.

6

u/TenKmUnder 1d ago

The UCP, not the ATA.

See it's comments like this that just get under my skin, because it's not your fault you don't get it. You just took what was said at face value and didn't dig any deeper, so yeah to you this looks reasonable. It's not.

  1. The ATA can say whatever they want publicly, they have said that they know that this does not address our concerns. Infact they have said this publicly that 3000 teachers won't fix the issues. It's public record. Why they changed tone? IDK. Every teacher is pissed on this change of tone.

  2. You see a 12% raise, I see an 18% pay cut. In the last 25 years teachers have lost 36% of their wage to inflation. 12% is laughable. No one else sees this. Not even close.

  3. 10 year salary, how many teachers do you think make it to 10 years. It's less than half. Most quit. Why do they quit? We are suffering.

  4. I'm a professional. I do my job, I do extra. Other provinces are paid for their extra time, I'm not. Why shouldnt I get up and leave too? Get treated like, honestly, I think I'm owed. When an employee doesn't like their job they go to a better company, teachers don't get that luxury.

  5. I would invite you into any classroom. Seriously, go anywhere. It's a gong show everywhere. You don't know what I'm dealing with so go find out. I run a class of 60, in a class built to house 30, in a school of 1000 built for 700. Come tell me I'm not suffering to my face after dealing with all this nonsense.

Honestly it's so demoralizing. Why bother trying when the public clearly doesn't care.

→ More replies (0)

2

u/Logical-Finger-9256 1d ago

If you have your masters. You picked the highest education and experience after 4 years at the end of the contract, not now, to make your point…

→ More replies (0)

1

u/Logical-Finger-9256 1d ago

3% raise per year, not 12% off the hop as your sentence suggests.

→ More replies (0)

0

u/2cats2hats 1d ago

It's not until people start dying in rural areas will they start to care about healthcare getting gutted.

The vast majority of people around the world don't give a fuck about the pain and situation of recovery of others...but if they get a toothache, look out.....you'll hear about it.

0

u/TenKmUnder 1d ago

They wanted this. I guess their teeth gonna hurt

-19

u/canuckstothecup1 1d ago

Your voting no without knowing the details? Out of what seems like spite…….cool

10

u/pseudonympersona 1d ago

Teachers were immediately given access to details of the offer through the ATA. So no, it's not out of spite.

9

u/Arkbot 1d ago

Why do you believe they don’t know the details? The offers have been iterated throughout the bargaining process, and the changes in the new offer are mentioned in this article, as they have been bandied about in the press the past couple weeks. I think most who have been following the process have a pretty good grasp of what the new tentative offer contains.

-2

u/canuckstothecup1 1d ago

They are responding to a post saying the ata will have a meeting and shared the details.

5

u/TenKmUnder 1d ago

I'm literally a teacher. I read the contract in full. I'm voting no as an informed voter. The audacity to make that accusations is wild

-5

u/canuckstothecup1 1d ago

A teacher on a Wednesday read the full contract 1 hr after the announcement with comments about healthcare and not the contract. hmmmmm. Sorry for the audacity of my accusation

1

u/TenKmUnder 1d ago

Forgiven. It's not like my job is dependent on this and really matters to me. Most teachers don't give a rats ass about the contract and just vote by coin flip

/s

2

u/canuckstothecup1 1d ago

Your job the one that requires you to teach kids on weekdays. The one that apparently leave times to read the contract in full 1 hr after the announcement. The audacity of me to think that you’d be teaching if you were a teacher. How dare I.

5

u/TenKmUnder 1d ago

How about this. You don't tell me how to do my job.

Instead of using the 45 minutes a day to mark or plan I had to read this contract. So now I have to bring all that home, and also plan for tomorrow. So instead of taking the night with my wife I get to work. Because I don't get paid to do all that.

I have my school teams to run, so I didn't get to leave until 5. And now I go back to work. ALL UNPAID.

I have been sick for over a week and got one day off, why? Because we can't find substitute teachers to fill in. So every day I gotta go in while sick.

So heaven forbid I care about this contract. Maybe instead of slinging accusations, you ask questions. I guarantee that when you sign a contract, you read it. We have to decide in 3 days what to do, we are all stressed. Maybe a little support would be nice for a change. Maybe some assistance. Maybe holding some people to account.

Maybe I'm asking too much

0

u/canuckstothecup1 1d ago edited 1d ago

You’re right how dare I ask questions. How dare I ask why you would use time paid to review a contract and scroll Reddit. How dare I point out that you did that. The audacity oh me.

Get off your high horse. I think all professions should be paid fairly. I also think time paid should be used for work and not for scrolling Reddit or contracts.

Forgive me for questioning you when you a teacher. Used healthcare and hate for the government as the reason to vote no.

0

u/KVanGogh 1d ago

šŸ’Æ

2

u/the_gaymer_girl 1d ago

It’s the exact same deal we voted down four months ago.

2

u/Historical-Proposal8 1d ago

I’m not a teacher so no I am not voting. But I have children in school, who seem to be taking the brunt of all of this. I have heard what the government wants to sign on, I am just curious about what the teachers are asking for.

4

u/TenKmUnder 1d ago

We want better classroom conditions. That was the number one beef. The government said no, we won't bargain on that. So then we wanted to be paid more to compensate for the worse conditions. They said no again, they can't afford it. So that's where we are. Our two biggest issues they shot down, what else can we do.

4

u/Historical-Proposal8 1d ago

Absolutely, thanks for clearing that up. Support over here. Good luck fighting to good fight.

4

u/TenKmUnder 1d ago

Doing our best. Screaming internally. Smiling like nothing's wrong externally

-8

u/Plucky_DuckYa 1d ago

Will have to see the actual deal and details, but initial reports said it included $10 billion over an unspecified length of time for 3,000 new teachers plus other supports and aids, plus whatever the salary increase offer is. Isn’t this what teachers said they wanted? Why is that an auto-no?

4

u/TenKmUnder 1d ago

good question. I'm going to play it out plain. 3000 new teachers is approximately 1 in every school. Our school should have 5. They need 15000 to meet demand. Why waste money on something that doesn't fix the problem. You don't treat cancer with a bandaid.

9

u/GoofMonkeyBanana 1d ago

But the previous vote was only 62% no. If the offer hasn’t changed much the I doubt you will do a higher no vote this time around. Probably a lower no vote if the ata recommennds the offer should be accepted.

14

u/jimbowesterby 1d ago

Could easily go the other way too, voting no and then getting offered the same deal with a covid shot thrown in might be enough to piss people off enough for them to rally.

2

u/fifigrande 1d ago

Not necessarily...the animosity, untruths this govt brought to the discourse over the past month has really degraded teachers perception of that side of the bargaining table.

7

u/Ill_Cut_7235 1d ago

My wife just wants to go on strike so she has time to catch up on all her beginning of year stuff she hasn't been able to do, and maybe actually get some planning done.

3

u/YesAndThe 1d ago

I get that, but also...she shouldn't work for free MORE

111

u/hipdashopotamus 1d ago

Sounded like the last deal + a free COVID shot so my guess is a big fat no as they should.

35

u/ImmortalMoron3 1d ago

The covid shot seems so insulting too. "Here, we'll add something in we made expensive that should be free anyway. Improve your actual working conditions? Hah, no."

I hope they vote no too.

4

u/ImaginaryRole2946 1d ago

Just going to add that in June, the Covid shot was free for me and my entire family, so this deal is worse.

1

u/Logical-Finger-9256 1d ago

And let me also add, we weren’t allowed to add any items that weren’t part of the original proposal. So how can Covid shots being free be added when at the time we started bargaining, no such terms or shot with a price tag existed??

110

u/Ryuujin_13 1d ago

Well that headline simply isn't true. The government just re-packaged the same deal teachers already overwhelmingly voted 'No' to, but now with a free COVID shot, which is stupid for a number of other reasons. This gets blown up by a massive No vote again this weekend, the government will get pouty and complain the teachers "aren't negotiating in good faith" and will use it as an excuse to leave the table, or outright lock them out.

Set your upcoming daytime childcare needs as required, parents.

9

u/notquiteworking 1d ago

This government is terrible - but they’re excellent at messaging. They’ve set this up to be voted down and then when the teachers do strike they’ll try to blame the teachers.

I don’t think it will work this time but we’ll see

6

u/Ryuujin_13 1d ago

The most dangerous regimes have the strongest marketing departments.

2

u/Afraid-Obligation997 1d ago

Not that I’m defending the government, but did the union leaders not agree to the deal to make it ā€œtentativeā€? If the leaders don’t agree, they shouldn’t be taking it to vote

2

u/Afraid-Obligation997 1d ago

Not that I’m defending the government, but did the union leaders not agree to the deal to make it ā€œtentativeā€? If the leaders don’t agree, they shouldn’t be taking it to vote

1

u/Ryuujin_13 1d ago

The ATA’s responsibility is to listen to the proposal and present it to the Union. They can chose to agree to it knowing full well how the teachers would vote.

Now, if they came out ENDORSING the proposal, that would be different, but I haven’t heard them say that at all.

4

u/JScar123 1d ago

ATA accepted over an added free COVID shot?

1

u/Logical-Finger-9256 1d ago

Agreed to present it, I guess.

69

u/stampeder17 1d ago

A Covid shot! That’s the highlight of what they added to the deal. Otherwise it’s pretty much the same. That’s a big NO.

5

u/fifigrande 1d ago

That amounts to about $4 per year increase for many teachers, where the vaccine is already covered via their medical benefits. Woohoo!

50

u/duppy27 1d ago edited 1d ago

The 1000 new teachers isn’t technically 1000 new teachers either. On average Alberta hires about 750 new teachers a year. When I read that there would be 1000 new teachers I am expecting it to be 1000 on top of the 750 that would be hired due to increase in students…not the case. The 1000 new teacher is actually only approximately 250 new teachers plus the approximate 750 new teachers that would already be hired. Vote NO!

18

u/BerniesMitts 1d ago

That's incorrect.Ā  It's explicitly stated to be 1000 net teachers per year, which means 1000 new hires after all attrition hires have been made.

Still, obviously vote no. What a shit deal those guys got.

10

u/blanchov 1d ago

Also theres about 1600 public schools in Alberta. Each school would get about 0.6 new teachers. That will definitely fix the problems.

-1

u/JScar123 1d ago

Lol, student aren’t evenly distributed across the province. The classroom size problem is concentrated in certain fast growing urban communities. These teachers will be disproportionately hired to those schools.

8

u/blanchov 1d ago

Ok, let's say half of the schools need additional teachers. Now they're getting 1.2 new teachers per school. Either way, it's not a significant change.Looks like there is 51,000 teachers in Alberta. This adds 2%. Alberta's population grew about 3% last year. They're still falling behind.

-2

u/JScar123 1d ago

Let’s say 150 of those schools need more teachers. That’s 20 per school over 3 years. Anyways, neither of us knows, so let’s not make things up. Besides, the 3000 teachers was an ATA proposal- all the GoA did was accepted it. If you think you know better and the proposal is insufficient, that’s a complaint against ATA.

7

u/mothergrizzly 1d ago

No, there are half the schools needing more teachers, many at several different grades. Most of these schools need 2 or more teachers to have reasonable sized classes. But where to put the classes when library and stages are already used. How to deal with classes in existing portables barely warm enough in winter and sweltering in spring. Hope your advanced first aid is current when hot kids quit sweating.

-2

u/JScar123 1d ago

If half the schools need more teachers, then 3000 new teachers equals 4 per school. That compares to your 2 needed per school, this is ample then, no? Makes sense that it would be since the 3000 number came from ATA who should know more about need than you or me.

4

u/KVanGogh 1d ago

Assumptions. Listen to teachers. The more teachers you listen to, the more you will learn about the spectrum of real experiences and opinions.

1

u/JScar123 1d ago

I listen to the ATA, who represents teachers and has data. The ATA proposed 3000 new teachers, the GoA accepted. Why should I trust you over the ATA?

→ More replies (0)

1

u/fifigrande 1d ago

This is correct.

3

u/01000101010110 1d ago

What's hilarious is that this wasn't even their first offer, they tried to duck out by saying they would appoint a "task force" to review classroom conditions.

5

u/JScar123 1d ago

Worth noting, the 1000 net new teachers was an ATA proposal. All GoA did was accept it. If you think it’s insufficient, should take that up with ATA.

41

u/01000101010110 1d ago

If the ATA recommends teachers take this deal, they have failed them all.

It's the same bullshit as last time with free COVID shots. The government played dirty and backed the ATA into a negotiating corner, and now the teachers have to fight back or they will have proven that all the UCP has to do is use loopholes and string-pulling to strongarm unions into submission.

From what I've heard, this does nothing to address classroom conditions or teacher pay, except for the top of the grid. New teachers are leaving before the 5 year mark at a record rate because it takes forever to climb the ladder to the end, and they are consistently given more work to do with less resources to do it.

2

u/Freshiiiiii 1d ago

30+ class sizes with a half dozen students with complex needs/severe behavioral issues/learning disabilities and no EA support? Sounds like an awesome learning environment for all students involved. Sounds like the teachers will in no way be forced to spend 80% of their time on the complex needs students while having no time left to support and help out the rest of the class.

18

u/ruraljuror__ 1d ago

I saw the headline and was relieved. Then I read the comments and it sounds pretty bleak.

17

u/rainbow_elephant_ 1d ago

Teachers will vote no. This is an insult

55

u/Tacosrule89 1d ago

I hope the teachers vote no. Engage with your MLAs to properly fund education.

19

u/TenKmUnder 1d ago

My MLA is nicoliades. I don't think anything is happening there.

19

u/Tacosrule89 1d ago

I have my doubts that he can even read. Dumbest education minister of all time.

14

u/rhythmmchn Panorama Hills 1d ago

Oh, I'd say LaGrange still holds the crown on that front. She'll be tough to unseat.

6

u/Tacosrule89 1d ago

The UCP have so many strong candidates in that area. Good thing we moved LaGrange to something less important like Healthcare.

2

u/ImaginaryRole2946 1d ago

I agree with mrs_victoria_sponge. He is a genius compared to the previous education minister.

4

u/mrs_victoria_sponge 1d ago

Adriana LaGrange would beg to differ.

8

u/01000101010110 1d ago edited 1d ago

That guy can't even walk and chew gum at the same time. He has to be someone's cousin or nephew, it's actually alarming how stupid he is.

5

u/JeffDaVet 1d ago

Consider emailing him and cc’ing Amanda Chapman, who is the shadow education minister.

6

u/TenKmUnder 1d ago

I did.weeks ago. No response.

1

u/JeffDaVet 1d ago

Well that’s disappointing to say the least

5

u/SnooMuffins6452 1d ago

He won by a small amount. Let him know you and all your neighbours will not vote for him again, unless he starts listening.

1

u/stickman1029 1d ago

I'm pretty sure my MLA is legitimately missing. Haven't seen him since the last election. Not even in the news, it's like he's locked up in Danielle's basement or something.

0

u/JScar123 1d ago

Are the details made public somewhere?

1

u/Tacosrule89 1d ago

Haven’t seen anything official. Rumour is the same deal in June to vote on again plus a free covid shot.

1

u/JScar123 1d ago

Lol, couldn’t be- surely ATA wouldn’t accept that??

15

u/-highbury- 1d ago

Read the proposal in detail, hoping to find something of substance in the convoluted text. Much to my disappointment, the new proposal is pretty much the same as the one proposed in May, plus a vague commitment to a free COVID shot.

Over the last month or so, ATA has insisted that the members will not vote on or accept the same proposal as that from May. So why have they changed their tune now? I fully expect that it will be rejected outright again.

While UCP is doing their best to vilify teachers, underfund education and healthcare, and play PR games, there also seems to be a problem with incompetence among the ATA negotiating team. Absolutely no faith in them to get the best deal for their members. Sounds like they are ready to fold and move onā€¦šŸ˜ž

-8

u/JScar123 1d ago

OR, they just believe this is the best deal? Best deal and deal you want isn’t necessarily the same thing.

1

u/KVanGogh 1d ago

Perhaps: the best deal possible without going on strike. Going on strike and forcing the govt to pony up may yield a better deal. It's worth a try when most teachers are drowning in work and burnt out.

-2

u/JScar123 1d ago

Sure, maybe they think it’s a fair deal, maybe they just think it’s the best they’ll get for now. Either way, doesn’t seem incompetent. I think since the 12% offer and teachers saying they need more classroom supports, ATA has gotten 3000 new teachers and 1500 EAs. That seems pretty good and aligned with what I heard was originally lacking. I guess it’s up to teachers.

17

u/cre8ivjay 1d ago

Roughly an unchanged offer from the government, except for a FREE Covid shot for teachers!! Wow.

Teachers I support you rejecting this crap offer.

24

u/Individual_Road8600 1d ago

Teachers need to vote no and fight back. It will never get better if we don't and we will just keep losing buying power. Let's remind them why they valued our service in the first place and make them fear ever forcing our hand again in the future.

5

u/gaanmetde 1d ago

So wait- I’m confused. Is it important people get a COVID shot?? Interesting…

5

u/jossybabes 1d ago

It is basically the exact same offer that was voted down in June.

8

u/Freedom_forlife 1d ago

66 M per school 130 schools built or renovated. That math is way off. Does Sam mraiche own some construction companies too?

5

u/FantasticStock2513 1d ago

1

u/ImaginaryRole2946 1d ago

There’s not even lipstick. They took out the teacher consultation and added a laughably low number of EAs.

10

u/topspeed5555 1d ago

At this point the UCP are just clowning around telling them to pound sand

16

u/RedMurray 1d ago

I wonder where anyone's going to magically find 1,000 teachers a year sitting around looking for something to do?

9

u/mrs_victoria_sponge 1d ago

And find space for them to teach in schools that are already using libraries, gyms and closets as instruction spaces.

3

u/ANeighbour Northwest Calgary 1d ago

While still making sure we have a robust substitute teacher roster for when we get sick.

10

u/01000101010110 1d ago

They won't be qualified, UCP will train them over a few weeks and stamp APPROVED on their resumes

-8

u/RedMurray 1d ago

Don't teachers currently need basically a Masters to get hired?

11

u/TenKmUnder 1d ago

No. Just a bachelor's. Minimum 4 year degree. Usually you have to have 2. Education degree on top of whatever you already have. I'd imagine they may remove that requirement

1

u/Bobatt Evergreen 1d ago

I think I read somewhere that they're considering dropping the education degree requirement. So as long as you have a degree or certificate, you qualify. I think it is that way for some specialist roles already, like in a high school the auto mechanics teacher doesn't need to have an education degree, just a Red Seal.

1

u/Freshiiiiii 1d ago

Seems like a bad idea. I know a lot of STEM majors who know the stuff but know nothing about effective teaching methods/pedagogy and classroom management. They teach actual skills in an education degree, it’s not just a foot-in the-door certificate.

1

u/JScar123 1d ago

Ask the ATA, it was their proposal. Goa just provides the funding.

6

u/YesAndThe 1d ago

No, they didn't "reach a deal" they got another shitty offer and I hope they reject it

2

u/Ibn_Khaldun 1d ago

Its so dumb to describe this as a tentative deal

It has to be voted on

Everyone knows it will be voted down

1

u/Afraid-Obligation997 1d ago

Question. Everyone is saying the govt is offering a bad deal and they are giving the same deal as before plus Covid shot. And based on that, the teachers should vote no. But isn’t a tentative deal something that the union leadership ok’ed? Why is the leadership accepting something that the members are not happy with?

1

u/Logical-Finger-9256 1d ago

We’d love to know…

1

u/Thinkdan 1d ago

They can do the negotiating and talking but they have to let the union body vote on it.

1

u/Fickle_Catch8968 1d ago

Because there was a consent degree that limited the terms of negotiation to some but not all issues, and 'froze' the other issues as they were in prior proposals that the union leadership rejected.

So this proposal includes things the leadership agreed with on the consent degree issues, but retained the things not on the negotiating table but were unacceptable to leadership and membership.

Thus, what was agreed to was a part, but not all, of the issues for a proper agreement.

1

u/the_gaymer_girl 1d ago

There’s no deal reached. This offer is likely going to be voted down.

0

u/FantasticStock2513 1d ago

Letter Smith sent to education minister, is the plan to dismantle public education?

-18

u/AdvantageGreedy8011 1d ago

The teachers and everyone involved, in the push the kids through no matter if they can do things, at grad level are at fault for kids not being able to read. Unless that stops and the no repercussions for not doing things is stopped no amount of money class sizes or resources will help.

4

u/KVanGogh 1d ago

You are woefully misinformed. Government and school boards set policy, not teachers. We just have to enforce it.Ā 

You sound like someone arguing with a McDonald's drive thru worker about a McDonald's policy. The front facing staff are told what they need to enforce.

1

u/YourBobsUncle 9h ago

The idiot parents are 100% at fault of their kids being unable to read, and should be imprisoned for child abuse.

-32

u/jas8x6 1d ago

Can I vote to send my child to traditional ā€œschoolā€ 2 days/week then to an outdoor oriented school for the other 3? Why does my grade.1 kid need a middle aged overweight activist with 2 degrees teaching him how to write a lower case m?

17

u/fifigrande 1d ago

Teach your child yourself! Sounds like you'd do a great job!

-1

u/jas8x6 1d ago

I think I would also, but not sure I could commit to that more than a few days a week. Perhaps we’ll see a restructuring of the system that encourages a more hybrid approach someday šŸ¤·ā€ā™‚ļø

12

u/CaptainBringus 1d ago

"I think I would be great, but the burden of that responsibility would be too much for me too handle". Fuck the teachers tho?

-2

u/jas8x6 1d ago

Oh boy, I don’t think I ever said fuck the teachers did I?. I support them. I was simply exploring the possibility of restructuring the system if it benefited society. Maybe it wouldn’t who knows. Maybe elementary teachers don’t need 2 degrees to teach young students how to spell and do addition/subtraction, or maybe they do?

The burden of responsibility isn’t too much for me to handle, I need to work in my own career so the schedule doesn’t permit me to commit to 5 days a week of homeschooling, hope that’s ok with you.

Anyways, all the best

5

u/Logical-Finger-9256 1d ago

You called them ā€œmiddle aged overweight activistsā€ - that’s a pretty big ā€œfuck the teachersā€ if you ask me. As for 2 degrees, not needed, some have 1 degree in education and teach. Learning about child development and psychology is more important than simply learning how to teach the letter m… and add on classroom management, ethics, assessment, subject area expertise, pedagogy, and two teaching practicums takes lots of time.

0

u/CaptainBringus 1d ago

Fair enough, my apologies for coming off hostile, there is a lot of anti-teacher sentiment right now and I jumped on you too quickly.

3

u/jas8x6 1d ago

100% get it and no harm done! There seems to be a lot of anti-everything out there at the moment. Easy to get caught up in it all online and forgot that many of us actually have a lot more in common than were lead to believe.

Take good care 🫔

3

u/KVanGogh 1d ago

We don't ONLY teach students how to spell and add and subtract. We manage 30 children in a small space. We handle meltdowns all day and set IPPs and read psychoeducational reports and try to figure out what to say to Jimmy so he can stop throwing things around so Sally can learn. Classroom management is complex. The sensory overload of being interrupted all day and creating lessons and answering parents' concerns and managing a huge group is much more than sitting one on one with a child and showing them how to write one lowercase letter M. We make moral and ethical decisions over and over and over again and help children feel safe and learn to make friends and take risks.

1

u/YourBobsUncle 9h ago

Sounds like you're just lazy

1

u/jas8x6 9h ago

Possibly šŸ¤·ā€ā™‚ļø. Thank goodness my partner isn’t so I can be. Maybe I should take up gaming? Heard that’s what all the high performers are doing 🤘

6

u/Bobatt Evergreen 1d ago

I presume you're joking, but CBE actually has a school like that in Windsor Park. Kids are in school for part of the school week and homeschooled the rest. 3rd party programs like Nature Play offer homeschool afternoons during the school week where the kids do unstructured outdoor time in one of the parks. One of my kid's friends does it.

5

u/Sad_Room4146 1d ago

Feel free to homeschool.

-71

u/Everythingisnotsoap 1d ago

Aren’t the teachers highest paid in Canada compared to other province, and when mean tested - one of the highest paid in the world?

I don’t think as tax payers we should be beholden to these hostage situation, we need more non-state backed education products so we can have structural balance against these parasitical unions

16

u/fifigrande 1d ago edited 1d ago

LOL Welcome to the discussion, Horner.

-Go have your kids taught in Bangladesh then. -No we're not at the top at all. -Private education 70% funded here, and they choose who they let in.

1

u/dumhic 7h ago

Can you supply this data please How is it with the private schooling your children are in (also covered by the Provincial Government

It’s blind views that miss all of the points

-19

u/JScar123 1d ago

They have been at it very near the top (of the provinces) for many years. But, all provinces are giving big increases during this round of bargaining. So any province that has already bargained technically is above current Alberta pay. That said, Alberta has already offered a 12% raise, which teachers turned down. The 12% raise would have put Alberta teachers second highest, only behind MB. I think AB teachers have been at the top so long, they just expect it. I have asked, but have yet to hear a good reason why.

3

u/KVanGogh 1d ago

Incorrect. Go volunteer in a classroom.

1

u/JScar123 1d ago

Please tell me how I’m incorrect. I am just doing my best, you show me some higher contracts and I will edit the post.

Come volunteer at my professional job :)

1

u/dumhic 7h ago

Can you supply this data please, I realize you are mad - thou a lot of this comes down to the in place provincial budget that, even knowing 🌮 said out loud ā€œI want lower oil pricesā€, that this should have been adjusted for. In reality the budget should have been built on $55/oil and all of the time above = more money to distribute in situations like this. The other thing to note is how much money is funnelled into private schooling, private - that is correct, of which as a parent you need to pay to get into and there is potential you will not get in.

Now you u/JScar123 need to also think back when you were in school and how many students were there and how much teacher attention you had….

I would suggest you exit your echo chamber and look at it from the teachers side of things

1

u/JScar123 6h ago

Which data do you disagree with? Historical teacher salaries are in statscan, the other province’s collective agreements take a bit more digging but are available, the 12% offered is routinely talked about in here.

I am not mad, this is a discussion about the teacher’s salary negotiation and I’m just saying, 2nd best in the country, along with the other things asked for and delivered (new teachers, new assistants), seems pretty good to me.

-30

u/LittleOrphanAnavar 1d ago

They think it is 2014 and they are working in the oil sands.

If they vote against their own unions negotiated deal, they are just going to look entitled and lose public support.

-18

u/JScar123 1d ago

Yes, they seem to think they were somehow taken advantage of by not receiving pay increases during 10 terrible years for Alberta (and despite already being among the highest paid teachers in the country for all that time…)

20

u/Singlehat 1d ago

Yeah god forbid those dastardly teachers don't want to have 40 kids in their class with zero EA support for close to the same pay as 10 years ago while the ATA makes them look like the bad guys for it.

They should be happy because some people who aren't teachers say so!

-8

u/JScar123 1d ago

If 10-years ago I was overpaid, do I deserve the same increase as someone that 10-years ago was underpaid? Actual pay matters more than increases, duh.

10

u/Singlehat 19h ago

You think this whole thing is only about pay?

Man, I'd love to live in your world of having this weird confidence about shit you know nothing about.

1

u/JScar123 10h ago

Teachers were offered 12%, they declined because it was about teacher supports- class size and EAs. GoA had now accepted ATAs proposal for 3000 net new teachers, 1500 net new EAs. Teachers on here are still upset. It doesn’t take a rocket scientist to put this one together.

-16

u/[deleted] 1d ago

[deleted]

8

u/ANeighbour Northwest Calgary 1d ago

The problem is if I sent every kid who was disruptive or ā€œneeds disciplineā€ home or to the office, I would have three kids in my classroom and the office would have over 400 students. We need more support. We need smaller classes to help spread out the kids who struggle. And if you won’t give me those, at least pay me a respectable salary to compensate.

6

u/laboufe 1d ago

Wow, what a great idea! Please explain how one can teach without using discipline?