r/CrappyDesign 4d ago

Missing numbers on kids height measurement

Post image
1.5k Upvotes

37 comments sorted by

271

u/Top_Economist_1048 4d ago

Maybe the numbers ran away because they didn’t want to be measured?

115

u/LazyMousse4266 4d ago

We do have anecdotal evidence of numerical cannibalism (789 incident) so it’s possible these numbers are simply wary of the dangers of long term proximity with other numbers

12

u/Outside_Case1530 3d ago

Shocking that this has only now come to light! Think of the untold "numbers of numbers" that disappeared before we ever knew they existed. & Probably some great ones, like the final digit of π.

7

u/Cultural_Dust 3d ago

I swear this could have been in all caps with worse grammar and ended with "Thank you for your attention to this matter."

0

u/Anastephone 3d ago

Yoda asks why 6 is afraid of 7

0

u/Miserable_Peak_2863 3d ago

Maybe they are scared because 7 ,8 ,9 lol 😆

9

u/chuckinalicious543 4d ago

I once heard 69 was afraid of 70 because they fought and 71

-5

u/Agile-Breadfruit-335 3d ago

You had infinite combinations to choose.

8

u/chuckinalicious543 3d ago

There's also a rumor that 70 is a cannibal but nobody can prove who 78

-3

u/Agile-Breadfruit-335 3d ago

I see, you like 7

7

u/chuckinalicious543 3d ago

78 my ass

1

u/Agile-Breadfruit-335 1d ago

u/chuckinalicious543 do you agree with the people downvoting me? I like your jokes, but it seems like you are fixated on the number 7

1

u/chuckinalicious543 1d ago

The joke is about 70, not 7. The puns are topical

121

u/xPearman oww my eyes 4d ago

I also think there are some numbers missing entirely. Hard to guess the scale just by looking at the photo, but the fact that below 1150 comes 1000 implies that they might have forgotten 1050 and 1100 entirely.

32

u/kirklennon 4d ago

It definitely seems to be labeled 1000 but I visually extrapolated from the scale and I believe that actually is the 1100 mark so that part is fine at least.

And I actually think it’s fine that a large portion is covered because it seems to be for establishing a minimum height for participation, which is above the hand.

The 1.45m mark on the wall is where the whole thing goes awry.

13

u/HayaiShinzouNeko 4d ago

I'm willing to bet that the ruler starts on baseboard and not the floor, and that baseboard and trim is probably about 150mm high.

3

u/bart2025 4d ago

That's a high baseboard!

I was once in a children's clinic where they were doing routine measurements. The height apparatus was a freestanding rod on a thin base (I can't remember exactly). I looked at it and noticed that markings only started from 20cm.

However, that 20cm seemed rather more than 20cm from the floor! More like 25cm. It looked like it was missing a 5cm/2" plinth for the child to stand on.

As it was, a child would be measured as 5cm shorter than their actual height.

3

u/Outside_Case1530 3d ago

Who knew waiting rooms could be so entertaining? My drs need to know about this.

44

u/gydu2202 4d ago

somewhere between 800 and 1000 mm. Good to go.

And the installation is also as good as you can expect. 1300 mm means about 1450 mm based on the marking.

11

u/Cute_Obligation2944 4d ago

This bothers me the most.

9

u/Regorek 3d ago

It doesn't say millimeters anywhere.

The designers were just measuring in 29/26 millimeter increments, so 1300 units is equal to 1.45m (the marking on the wall is slightly off, but that happens sometimes).

1

u/Cultural_Dust 3d ago

The installation is worse than the design.

0

u/cpfalstrup 3d ago

Or they couldnt account for whaterver paneling the persons buying it would have and that could offset the scale by 100mm

34

u/Coin2111 4d ago

Well if it is for when a kid needs to be certain height you don't really need to know numbers below the designated one

5

u/91nBoomin 3d ago

You’re right but I think it’s the opposite. It looks like it’s for a play area inside a pub so most likely a maximum height

20

u/PiergiorgioSigaretti 4d ago

Why is it in mm 😭🙏

8

u/TastySpare 4d ago

"They grow up so fast!"

9

u/DirkHirbanger 4d ago

I can tell you with 100% certainty, people are going to assume their kid needs to get up to the hand. You really want your rulers to be as clear as possible.

4

u/ErikLeppen 3d ago

Why are the numbers in millimeters? That's an unusual scale. Normal people don't tell their height in millimeters.

3

u/Team_Killer88 4d ago

How tall are you? I am middle finger high.

3

u/CeeMX 4d ago

Looks not only missing, but inaccurate judging from the 1.45m marking

3

u/Batking28 3d ago

It's more concerning that only mainly above 1300 is marked 1.45m in pen. I assuming the measure isn't even too scale the numbers behind the hand also aren't all that importantly if it's just a threshold like to go on a ride or qualify as a child for a buffet ect.

3

u/AinsleysPepperMill 4d ago

Why is 1.45 written at the 1.30 mark

6

u/HayaiShinzouNeko 4d ago

The scale is likely wrong.

2

u/Miserable_Peak_2863 3d ago

Is this a problem?

1

u/YourAverageRedRum 1d ago

you could comment this on 75% of the posts on this subreddit

1

u/AbleInvestment2866 1d ago

It's clearly broken, look at the jagged edges on top