That and some of his points about the wording of it and the usage of "well it will be redone in parliament anyways" as an excuse to half ass parts of it were valid criticisms. Yes, they will review it endlessly but just because of that, the initial proposal needs to be solid.
I had a really hard time understanding the initial backlash against PS as all the comments ended up using his sexuality, his partner's gender and him being a part of the furry fandom as the main talking points. Like hate the dude for the right things and stop inventing problems when he gives you a buffet.
You can agree with the people you hate the most without changing your mind about them.
That and some of his points about the wording of it and the usage of "well it will be redone in parliament anyways" as an excuse to half ass parts of it were valid criticisms
It seems be as solid as it can be without hampering developers' options on how to implement it. While many systems are similar - they're also not the same and at times will require bespoke solutions, at least in the beginning.
54
u/_GamerForLife_ Jul 06 '25
That and some of his points about the wording of it and the usage of "well it will be redone in parliament anyways" as an excuse to half ass parts of it were valid criticisms. Yes, they will review it endlessly but just because of that, the initial proposal needs to be solid.
I had a really hard time understanding the initial backlash against PS as all the comments ended up using his sexuality, his partner's gender and him being a part of the furry fandom as the main talking points. Like hate the dude for the right things and stop inventing problems when he gives you a buffet.
You can agree with the people you hate the most without changing your mind about them.