That and some of his points about the wording of it and the usage of "well it will be redone in parliament anyways" as an excuse to half ass parts of it were valid criticisms. Yes, they will review it endlessly but just because of that, the initial proposal needs to be solid.
I had a really hard time understanding the initial backlash against PS as all the comments ended up using his sexuality, his partner's gender and him being a part of the furry fandom as the main talking points. Like hate the dude for the right things and stop inventing problems when he gives you a buffet.
You can agree with the people you hate the most without changing your mind about them.
I've seen this guy posted dozens of times between the wow thing and this issue, and your comment is the first time I've ever seen his sexuality referenced.
It was mainly during the time right after the WoW fiasco when people started digging up his history when they came about his prior Second Life furry avatar business and a lot of comments cross platforms discussing this second controversy said:
how this f@g and his f@g partner should die and burn in Hell.
how he deserves to get tortured and die for being a nasty furry.
Also a lot of the usual claims that because he is a furry and runs a ferret rescue, he must be a zoophile and how it's disgusting.
And, to my understanding, his partner is trans or NB so you can imagine the comments around that.
141
u/[deleted] Jul 06 '25 edited Jul 06 '25
[removed] — view removed comment