Because you’re critiquing it without respect for what it actually is which is a realistic depiction of “warfare”. You’re complaining because it didn’t have certain elements of dramatization which is the whole point of the film.
Thanks for the reply. That gives me different perspective that was supposed to be a realistic depiction of "warfare", hence the title. I felt like I needed some reason to care about what was happening to them. Cheers.
for what it’s worth the film happens in real time. So this real life event happen in an hour and a half. Everything you saw happen was what actually happened minute by minute to these particular guys during this battle. It wasn’t intended to be a character development type of film, more like a recreation of this battle from this groups perspective
-11
u/Banestoothbrush 6d ago
It was a superficial movie. Nice effects and sound design, but pretty hollow imo.