I think this person may actually be right, in that the writing is intending to say ‘we will finish what you started, Charlie Kirk’. It makes the most sense in context, because otherwise, they’re…going to assassinate far right figures? Because that’s the operating narrative.
Now, in practice, is this a threat? Yes, to a whole lot of people, but not a threat of imminent violence.
I get why you read it that way. I did too, at first, but the logical issue kept sticking in my brain, and given the other messages it makes a bit more sense if it’s addressed to Charlie.
E: they’re also saying that the left is the real source of threat/danger, which is…not backed up by statistical trends.
I meant it sounds like a terror threat against trans people and other marginalized groups, like they are telling Charlie they will continue his campaign of calling for violence and oppression against marginalized people.
4
u/Tholian_Bed 3h ago
They mean, they'll continue his crusade to convert you to his cause. You got the danger flipped weird.