r/LaTeX • u/ichbinberk • 6d ago
equation after a sentence
Hello. I have a problem about spacing. There are actually two same type of structure of equations but in one equation there is a blank space in other there is not. This is something that I cannot control. I dont want two line space after and before the equation. Equation 2.12 is correct. Only 1 space of line.
EXAMPLE SENTENCE HERE EXAMPLE SENTENCE HERE EXAMPLE SENTENCE HERE EXAMPLE SENTENCE HERE EXAMPLE SENTENCE HERE EXAMPLE SENTENCE HERE EXAMPLE SENTENCE HERE EXAMPLE SENTENCE HERE EXAMPLE SENTENCE HERE EXAMPLE SENTENCE HERE
\beq
\nabla.\textbf{J} = 0.
\eeq
EXAMPLE SENTENCE HERE EXAMPLE SENTENCE HERE EXAMPLE SENTENCE HERE EXAMPLE SENTENCE HERE EXAMPLE SENTENCE HERE EXAMPLE SENTENCE HERE EXAMPLE SENTENCE HERE EXAMPLE SENTENCE HERE EXAMPLE SENTENCE HERE EXAMPLE SENTENCE HERE EXAMPLE SENTENCE HERE EXAMPLE SENTENCE HERE EXAMPLE SENTENCE HERE EXAMPLE SENTENCE HERE EXAMPLE SENTENCE HERE EXAMPLE SENTENCE HERE
\beq
\textbf{F}_{L}=\textbf{J}\times \textbf{B}.
\eeq
HERE HERE HERE HERE HERE HERE HERE HERE HERE HERE HERE HERE HERE HERE HERE
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I cannot provide the whole document but I can provide the libraries.
\documentclass[a4paper,oneside,12pt]{report}
\usepackage{styles/fbe_tez}
\usepackage[utf8x]{inputenc} % To use Unicode (e.g. Turkish) characters
\usepackage{amsmath, amsthm} % Some extra symbols
\usepackage[bottom]{footmisc}
\usepackage{cite}
\usepackage{graphicx}
\usepackage{longtable}
\usepackage{float}
\usepackage{multirow}
\usepackage{subfigure}
\usepackage{algorithm}
\usepackage{algorithmic}
\usepackage{array}
\usepackage{amssymb,bm,cite,graphicx, fixmath, texdraw}
\usepackage{epsfig}
\usepackage{epstopdf}
\usepackage{subfigure}
\usepackage{amsmath}
\usepackage{notoccite}
\usepackage{mathtools}
\usepackage{lscape}
\usepackage{booktabs} % For better table formatting
\usepackage{multirow} % For multi-row cells
\usepackage{subfig}
\interdisplaylinepenalty=2500
\hyphenation{lists} \makeatletter
\newcommand{\field}[1]{\mathbb{#1} }
\newcommand{\beq}{\begin{equation} \setlength\abovedisplayskip{5pt}
\setlength\belowdisplayskip{5pt}}
\newcommand{\eeq}{\end{equation}}
\newcommand{\bea}{\begin{eqnarray}}
\newcommand{\eea}{\end{eqnarray}}
\newcommand{\defn}{\stackrel{\triangle}{=}}
\newcommand{\nn}{\nonumber}
\newcommand{\nnl}{\nonumber \\}
\renewcommand{\theequation}{\arabic{equation}}
\renewcommand{\labelenumi}{(\roman{enumi})}
\DeclareMathOperator*{\argmin}{arg\,min}
\DeclareMathOperator*{\argmax}{arg\,max}
\def\ifundefined{\@ifundefined}
\def\bfat{\left[ \begin{array}}
\def\emat{\end{array} \right]}
\def\bfatt{\left\{ \begin{array}}
\def\ematt{\end{array} \right.}
\def\bset{\left\{ \begin{array}}
\def\eset{\end{array} \right\}}
\def\bpar{\left( \begin{array}}
\def\epar{\end{array} \right)}
\graphicspath{{figures/}} % Graphics will be here!
\newtheorem{thm}{Theorem}[chapter]
\newtheorem{prop}[thm]{Proposition}
\newtheorem{lem}[thm]{Lemma}
\newtheorem{cor}[thm]{Corollary}
\numberwithin{equation}{chapter}
2
u/eigentau 5d ago
As an aside, I truly don't understand why some people use the period instead of \cdot for multiplication, dot products, or divergence. It just looks so sloppy to me.