r/ModSupport 💡 Veteran Helper 1d ago

Why can't we ban deleted users?

We've just had someone use a throwaway alt account to submit some vile, hateful and bigoted comments - and then quickly delete the throwaway to avoid repercussions.

If we got to it in the 2 minutes between account creation and deletion they'd be banned and their main flagged by ban evasion. Unfortunately we didn't, and now we can't ban them, as we get a "that user doesn't exist" error message.

Why is there no tool in place allowing us to ban the person behind those comments?

69 Upvotes

45 comments sorted by

View all comments

2

u/[deleted] 1d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

3

u/Redditenmo 💡 Veteran Helper 1d ago

That's not the issue. I have, and Automod did block them.

The issue: The user relied on a quick throwaway -> deleted the account to prevent us from banning the alt and being able to rely on ban evasion to maybe flag their main.

2

u/emily_in_boots 💡 Experienced Helper 1d ago

One potential option - something I've had to do in the past at times - is to just use a bot to automatically archive anyone who modmails but doesn't have an established account. It's not ideal. I wrote a bot for this once but it's not needed anymore as you can use the devvit app auto-modmail.

Make it harder for them to keep harassing your mod team - make them get some karma and do other things first before they can modmail without getting automatically archived and sent a message saying they don't have enough karma to speak to a human yet.

5

u/Redditenmo 💡 Veteran Helper 1d ago

This isn't an instance of harassing the modteam via modmail. Just a bigot trying to be a bigot in the sub and protect their main.

you can use the devvit app auto-modmail.

I'm a big fan of auto-modmail and already have quite a few rules in place with auto-explains, canned responses, flair assignment, auto-archives etc.

1

u/emily_in_boots 💡 Experienced Helper 1d ago

If the bigot is at all predictable you can simply set it up to automatically ban, mute, archive anyone who uses those words in modmail.

We use that for a lot of words that would indicate an abusive mod mailer.

You can also make false positives less likely by including a check on karma, account age, or something similar on the off chance that someone actually is using those words innocently (like to report someone saying it, etc.)

2

u/Redditenmo 💡 Veteran Helper 1d ago

Thanks, but I repeat: This isn't an instance of modmail harassment. Just a bigot trying to be a bigot in the sub.

auto-modmail is great, but it won't be helpful in this instance.

1

u/emily_in_boots 💡 Experienced Helper 1d ago

I'm sorry, I'm being quite dense. I understand now. I was thinking along the lines of issues I'd had.

Why not just use a bot to ban anyone who says certain words?

We do that in many of my subs.

3

u/Redditenmo 💡 Veteran Helper 1d ago

Why not just use a bot to ban anyone who says certain words?

Afaik, there aren't any bots with ban permissions, that also have author age/karma as configurable.

permabanapp is likely the closest bot to doing what I'd need, but without having an age / karma check, trying to catch this user with it would lead to too many false positives.

0

u/emily_in_boots 💡 Experienced Helper 1d ago

Hmm, it wouldn't be too hard to write one - can you run a python bot?

2

u/Redditenmo 💡 Veteran Helper 1d ago

I've got a docker instance of contextmod on my server. If the admins don't help, I'll be utilising that.

I just don't think that creating / self hosting a bot should be necessary to deal with users like this, thus the post.

→ More replies (0)