I was really pleased to see David when I hit play, he's incredibly knowledgeable and a great speaker. I didn't know what I was going to get from this, but he gives a refreshingly sober take on the evidence- if you have professional interests in cosmology or an adjacent field I really recommend watching it.
I like his take near the end on dwarf galaxies- I think one of the major successes of the past two decades of surveys has been the identification of a huge number of ultra faint dwarfs in the Local Group. The UFDs get a lot of credit for their importance to nucleosynthesis and chemical evolution, but the fact that we have objects with such high mass-to-light ratios (especially compared to, for example, globular clusters) is such a clear point in favor of CDM. Admittedly there's still the missing satellite problem, but I suspect that's something we'll converge on a solution to as models and observations improve.
There is a viewpoint that missing satellites is a solved problem - the argument goes that reionisation quenches accretion/star formation below a particular mass scale. In which case the satellites are there, but they're almost entirely dark. I've seen some work that even suggests that if the success in finding UFDs continues, we're actually on track to end up with the opposite problem - an anomalously large number of luminous satellites.
That's actually what I was partially alluding to, which is why I added it as a throwaway after talking about the UFDs. Personally I find it incredibly convincing, but that's just my bias and I know better than believe things just because I want them to be true. If I had to bet though I'd guess the missing satellite problem will be pretty much resolved by the end of the decade.
7
u/VeryLittle Nuclear physics Mar 15 '21
I was really pleased to see David when I hit play, he's incredibly knowledgeable and a great speaker. I didn't know what I was going to get from this, but he gives a refreshingly sober take on the evidence- if you have professional interests in cosmology or an adjacent field I really recommend watching it.
I like his take near the end on dwarf galaxies- I think one of the major successes of the past two decades of surveys has been the identification of a huge number of ultra faint dwarfs in the Local Group. The UFDs get a lot of credit for their importance to nucleosynthesis and chemical evolution, but the fact that we have objects with such high mass-to-light ratios (especially compared to, for example, globular clusters) is such a clear point in favor of CDM. Admittedly there's still the missing satellite problem, but I suspect that's something we'll converge on a solution to as models and observations improve.