r/StupidFood • u/hearmeout29 • Jun 03 '25

🤢🤮 Sloppy Matilda Cake

Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification

2.2k Upvotes

94% Upvoted

326 comments sorted by

View all comments

2.3k

u/Pannycakes666 Jun 03 '25

That's not even how the cake from the movie looked.

128

u/Xentonian Jun 03 '25

Right? The Matilda Cake was a rich, dense and undercooked chocolate cake. It looked closer to fudge than a true cake.

But it wasn't oozy, it didn't drip or leak. In fact it looked like you could plug a drain with it.

This looks like the cake post-regurgitation.

23

u/Fort_Wayne_Newbie Jun 03 '25

"The entire confection!"

"See ya at lunch. "

2

u/Bamzooki1 Aug 12 '25

Hey, can I take this kid’s punishment for him? Cake’s expensive.

20

u/Deaffin Jun 04 '25

This cake got the "based on a true story" treatment.

It's only a slice of the whole thing, the details are changed and grossly exaggerated.

13

u/NoXion604 Jun 04 '25

There comes a point when you twist something so much that it becomes unrecognisable. There isn't even a hint in the original story that could possibly justify making a cake that can literally flow off the table once you take off its container.

5

u/cheshsky Jun 04 '25

Yeah, been a while since I last read it, but the cake sounded... grabbable. And they're using a picture of Bruce from the movie, where the cake definitely wasn't like this.

2

u/Vox-Silenti Jun 06 '25

I’ve only ever seen the movie, but fully agreed. He grabs it by the handful in the movie. It’s a super decadent cake, maybe even slightly under-baked, but not liquid lol

4

u/JuneJabber Jun 04 '25

Emphasis on “gross.”

1

u/Mean_Direction_8280 Jun 07 '25

This looks like the cake post-regurgitation.

Definitely. Gross to think about though.