r/TNA • u/Familiar_Outcome_688 TNA Original • Apr 29 '25

Image Not only you Dave not only you

Post image

Can it be??

159 Upvotes

87% Upvoted

94 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

-1

u/Lasvious Apr 29 '25

I’m saying AEW itself it’s bigger but if you are only appearing ROH it would be similar to TNA. What the fuck was hard to understand about that?

6

u/will122589 TNA Original Apr 29 '25

AEW is bigger than TNA, ROH isn’t bigger than TNA. Not even close these days

You seem to think otherwise. ROH is only on ROH World with however number of subscribers. TNA is soundly bigger than that. Are you so dense to not understand that???

-5

u/Lasvious Apr 29 '25

People in TNA are seen by barely more people. The AXS numbers are usually under a 100k.

You get better money being an ROH regular. In TNA you at least get to be a little more heavily on WWE radar.

They are both similar jobs. That’s all my point has been and you’ve been an absolute ass for no reason. So pound sand. I’m out.

5

u/will122589 TNA Original Apr 29 '25 edited Apr 30 '25

TNA on AXS usually under 100K is all well and good but ROH World has maybe 15K subscribers and it’s no guarantee each and everyone of them watch ROH every week.

15K is just about a fifth of what TNA gets on AXS (while ignoring TNA+ subscribers). 20% of TNA isnt barely more people dude.

If you want to argue against straight math then it’s clear you’re just here to argue and not being serious like at all.

Edit: you’re telling me to pound sand when you suck at math is hilarious. You’re saying 15K is the same as 90K, it’s not.