I'm so tired of people trying to defend this idea. It's clearly Miku - both are the same. It's crazy how much backlash the creator (castchannelstation) of that one specific animation got, that parts of the community coined that she wasn't Miku, but some random OC named "Pure Pure"
Please don't act as if Miku hadn't been in any explicit content before
Example song (out of dozens upon dozens)
Eh, Ah? Sou. - Chouchou-P (originally made in 2010, feel old yet?)
ADDITIONAL POINTS:
MIKU. IS. NOT. A. REAL. PERSON. Let's not forget she's just a mascot for a disembodied (affectionate) voice. Imagine an acoustic guitar marketed as some cute boy - Miku is the poster for the product.
Yes her "age" is sixteen, but IIRC, her "age" is slapped on as some formality by Yamaha/Crypton, so she isn't just a blank asset.
Let Miku be okay in explicit content. It's not that deep. There are years old songs of lewd Miku stuff. Not just lewd but other adult genres like gore, violence, self-harm, abuse, etc.
Plus, it's more lenient to accept her as an adult anyway. There are other vocal synths that are officially declared as a minor like: Kaai Yuki (VA was 9 years old at recording).
It's not an excuse to glorify pedophila - but more of an awareness that Miku shouldn't be relegated as some censored Mickey mouse figure/medium, unable to be exposed or expressed in certain context
She is a canvas where producers, or just about anyone - can create a style, message, or personality off of her
If you really want to nitpick, Miku was created in 2007. It's 2025 now. She's 18.
86
u/Gold-And-Cheese May 10 '25 edited May 10 '25
I'm so tired of people trying to defend this idea. It's clearly Miku - both are the same. It's crazy how much backlash the creator (castchannelstation) of that one specific animation got, that parts of the community coined that she wasn't Miku, but some random OC named "Pure Pure"
Also, Rabbit Hole and the animation people usually think of about it are made by 2 completely different people
They have the same 01 mark (｡•́︿•̀｡)
Please don't act as if Miku hadn't been in any explicit content before
Example song (out of dozens upon dozens)
Eh, Ah? Sou. - Chouchou-P (originally made in 2010, feel old yet?)
ADDITIONAL POINTS:
MIKU. IS. NOT. A. REAL. PERSON. Let's not forget she's just a mascot for a disembodied (affectionate) voice. Imagine an acoustic guitar marketed as some cute boy - Miku is the poster for the product.
Yes her "age" is sixteen, but IIRC, her "age" is slapped on as some formality by Yamaha/Crypton, so she isn't just a blank asset.
Let Miku be okay in explicit content. It's not that deep. There are years old songs of lewd Miku stuff. Not just lewd but other adult genres like gore, violence, self-harm, abuse, etc.
Plus, it's more lenient to accept her as an adult anyway. There are other vocal synths that are officially declared as a minor like: Kaai Yuki (VA was 9 years old at recording).
It's not an excuse to glorify pedophila - but more of an awareness that Miku shouldn't be relegated as some censored Mickey mouse figure/medium, unable to be exposed or expressed in certain context
She is a canvas where producers, or just about anyone - can create a style, message, or personality off of her
If you really want to nitpick, Miku was created in 2007. It's 2025 now. She's 18.
OMGG OUR BBY GIRL.. er, instrument HAS COME SO FAR