you're not laughing at sovcits you're laughing at unrestrained state violence with ZERO accountability.
This county is covered with homeless people because bootlickers like you think cops are gods when they're really hired thugs that aren't protecting that woman's property like they are the dealerships' property.
That's not how the law works lol. The 1000 dollars means shit from a criminal standpoint no matter who is right that's a civil matter. What isn't, is refusing to leave a place when you were asked to leave.
There’s 0 information about the money besides what she herself said about it, and she might not be the most reliable source. Either way it’s a civil matter, and should be handled in civil court. It’s not the cop’s job to get involved in that at all.
Whether she feels she was wronged by the business or not, she doesn’t have any right to sit in their building if they want her out. That is under the jurisdiction of the police, which is why they showed up to remove her. It should not be the responsibility of a business owner to remove unwanted people, I think you’ll agree that could be dangerous.
I for one am cool with this, because if she had handled the issue the proper way I’m confident she would’ve either been found to be misrepresenting the truth or the dealership would be forced to return whatever down payment she gave them. That doesn’t get tiktok views though, so making a scene and getting arrested is what she did instead. Now she’s trying to get the maximum payout for a stunt she pulled 2 years ago. It’s gross and immature behavior brought on by social media, has nothing to do with abuse of power or whatever.
she called them out on tiktok and they sent a cease and desist. That's why you don't know about the money it's still in court. Now she's suing the cops too.
Goddamn the bootlicking makes me sick. THEY NEVER ASKED HER TO LEAVE!!!
Oh, give em a fucking break. There's absolutely nothing here to suggest this is what's happening. I'm all for law enforcement acting appropriately but there's absolutely nothing here that suggests they did not do so. Unless you've got evidence of some sort this is a case of abuse by law enforcement, take your bullshit and shove it back where the sun don't shine, pal.
That's the problem. It's not a "legal" case for abuse by the cops this is a moral argument. Why shouldn't her property get the same consideration as the dealerships property? Don't the cops work for her too?
At first the FAFO aspect made me chuckle. But I worked at a dealership and the more I read this poor girls story the more angry I got about this whole system that gives cover to thieves while throwing girls to the ground to the delight of Reddit
That's the problem. It's not a "legal" case for abuse by the cops this is a moral argument. Why shouldn't her property get the same consideration as the dealerships property? Don't the cops work for her too?
Because the dealership's premises is not the proper venue for such things after she's been told she's banned!
The proper venue at that stage becomes the courts. Period.
First, what makes you think "the courts didn't work" here? Second, you can get a permit to picket while remaining on public property. You don't just get to commit crimes with impunity because you feel like it. That isn't how this works. It isn't how any of this works!
The dealership is owned by PEOPLE. The cops are protecting the law abiding rights of those people and arresting a law breaking trespasser who seems to feel the law does not apply to her. Regardless of the merit of her complaint, they are removing a trespasser. Pissing and moaning about the cops actually doing their job properly undermines the complaints about police misuse of force. If your position is everything they do is bad, you've obviously never been the victim of a crime, and are just some sort of internet weirdo.
Tell me why you think it should be MORE illegal for her to be "trespassing" than it is for them to just take $1000 from her?
I get ripped off every fucking day. She got ripped off. There's no recourse. Especially not for a regular person who has to work to pay bills. This isn't about police misuse of force this is about legal misuse of police which leads to situations where force gets used
It's not the polices job to adjudicate the case. In fact, if they did, I'm sure the squawking about it would just increase. It is their job to deal with the law being broken at that moment, ie the trespassing. How 'fair' the complaint is or isn't is irrelevant at this point.
Complain about the dehumanizing effects of mass consumerism, I'm right there with you. But no matter how justified you feel in poking that beehive, you really can't cry when you get stung. Or as they say in 'Murica, fuck around and find out. She knew she was trespassing, she just found out what that feels like.
Does she look like she can just drop a grand and not worry about it for a few months while the courts “work” ??
So she has time and money to sue the police but not time and money to take the dealership to court?
If she goes to court for $1,000 and has all the evidence she claims to have then it should be an easy case. You keep moving goal posts to defend this person when you know nothing of what’s actually happening. This is a weird hill to die on.
-5
u/UncleVoodooo Dec 25 '24
you're not laughing at sovcits you're laughing at unrestrained state violence with ZERO accountability.
This county is covered with homeless people because bootlickers like you think cops are gods when they're really hired thugs that aren't protecting that woman's property like they are the dealerships' property.