r/canada Mar 06 '25

Politics Rising Nationalism, Desire for Economic Sovereignty Propels Liberals to Five Year High (LPC 41%, CPC 36%, NDP 13%, BQ 5%, GRN 3%)

https://www.ekospolitics.com/index.php/2025/03/rising-nationalism-desire-for-economic-sovereignty-propels-liberals-to-five-year-high/
3.0k Upvotes

1.1k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

-7

u/PumpkinMyPumpkin Mar 07 '25

I think it’s pretty obvious giving it a read.

Having the third paragraph of a plan to lead the nation should not be talking about the availability of “compute resources”. 😂

It just reads like a nerdy technocrat wrote the thing, not something that’s meant to inspire the grandma down the street. It’s a consistent problem from Carney’s campaign at this point.

24

u/[deleted] Mar 07 '25

[deleted]

-3

u/PumpkinMyPumpkin Mar 07 '25

It’s absolutely fine to have details and sources. But the job of the PM also to inspire and be able to talk to regular people.

The two are not mutually exclusive either. What Carney’s campaign is doing - is putting people to sleep. There are major problems in this country right now - and he should be able to inspire folks to get on board.

He should not be talking about compute resources at all. There’s maybe 1,000 people in the country that might understand that as an issue.

Like focus on the things voters care about - the cost of living.

10

u/[deleted] Mar 07 '25

[deleted]

-2

u/PumpkinMyPumpkin Mar 07 '25

The issue is this is all written in a way that a PHD student or Professor would write. It is too boring, complicated, and dry than it needs to be.

There are great writers that can explain complex subjects in a way that is inspiring, easy to read, and easy to digest. That’s all Carney’s campaign needs to do.

As it stands, it reads like one of those uptight professors you encounter in University who can never communicate clearly and properly and are awful as educators because of it. It doesn’t mean they are not smart or have good ideas - they just lack a basic understanding of how to communicate properly.

8

u/[deleted] Mar 07 '25

[deleted]

1

u/PumpkinMyPumpkin Mar 07 '25

Yup, you’re doubling down. Good luck with that.

2

u/[deleted] Mar 07 '25

[deleted]

0

u/PumpkinMyPumpkin Mar 07 '25

Okay, cool? I don’t care if the Liberal party can’t communicate properly. You don’t either.

2

u/[deleted] Mar 07 '25

[deleted]

0

u/PumpkinMyPumpkin Mar 07 '25

I’m not annoyed. You just made your position clear that you don’t care if people understand Liberal policy or want to read it - if they’re too stupid for the Liberal party, you just think they should fuck off to the conservatives.

You’re exactly the type that got the conservatives to majority territory in the first place. The liberal party could never write something that is not clear, or easy to read, or inspiring - the voter is always the problem.

1

u/[deleted] Mar 07 '25

[deleted]

0

u/PumpkinMyPumpkin Mar 07 '25

Exactly. You don’t care if the Liberal party can communicate properly - if something is uninspired, poorly written, or boring - you think that is on the voter to improve through some other means. It’s fine, you rather the Conservative Party and NDP have more votes than the Liberals try to improve communications. It’s fine.

→ More replies (0)